Roger 🔥

NEW LEAK: Price sheet of 200+ crypto influencers and their wallet addresses from a project they were recently contacted by to promote. From 160+ accounts who accepted the deal I only saw <5 accounts actually disclose the promotional posts as an advertisement.

8,360 wallets received their $MEGA allocation: • 50% are still holding • 40% sold everything • 10% partially sold Token sits at $1.7B FDV Bottom in?

12 more protocols got hacked since the $280M Drift exploit Here’s what the last 2 weeks looked like: > CoW Swap: frontend/DNS hijack > Hyperbridge: forged message exploit 1B tokens minted, price → zero > Bybit: $1B exploit attempt Blocked in time > KuCoin: $9.5M laundered > Kraken: insider extortion attempt 2,000+ accounts exposed > Dango: smart contract bug $410K drained > Silo V2: oracle exploit $392K lost > BSC TMM: reserve manipulation $1.67M lost > Aethir / SubQuer: access control $480K combined > MONA: burn address exploit $61K lost > Zerion: social engineering $100K drained Overall in 2026 around 45 protocols hacked $450M+ lost in total What’s actually the weakest link right now - code, people, or the system itself?

Just got this email from Binance 🇲🇾 !!! Malaysians with MY KYC will no longer be able to use P2P through the PGK currency 🚨 Restrictions begin: 10/4/2026 Deadline to complete ongoing trades: 20/4/2026 Full restriction: 30/4/2026

35 DeFi protocols hacked in 2026 already $453M+ lost in just 4 months • January $103M across 12 protocols • February $24M across 8 protocols • March $41M across 14 protocols • April so far $285M across 1 protocol Smart contract bugs and compromised private keys This industry has a serious security problem When does it actually get fixed?

Hey everyone — we’re aware of the large swap transaction circulating on X. Based on what we’ve seen so far, there’s no indication of a protocol exploit or otherwise malicious behavior. The transaction executed according to the parameters of the signed order. Our interface shows clear price impact warnings for swaps of this magnitude, as does Aave’s. We’re continuing to review the details and will share updates as we learn more.

JUST IN: Binance Founder CZ says "crypto will make you not need a job." "Buy and hold now, retire in a few years."

JUST IN: OpenAI to begin rolling out ads in ChatGPT.

Solana validator count is collapsing toward zero 5k → 800 in one year running a validator keeps getting harder as hardware requirements keep rising “Solana is decentralized”

Bull Run 2025 is officially over BTC will dump to $30K, alts -90% I analyzed every bear and was shocked Here's market breakdown and what's next👇🧵

mina raised $140m “the lightest blockchain” because there are literally no users on it couldn’t even build a bridge in 8 years zk apps 💀 (literally zero knowledge, since none of them actually exist) founder left right after the vesting cliff completed unlimited supply and mina from staking rewards keep getting dumped nonstop still sitting at $100m fdv zero

Pumpfun, the Solana Foundation, and the founders. What was obvious has now reached the courtroom. The 5.5 Billion USD RICO Case. Here is everything summarized that is known so far: In July 2025, a consolidated class action lawsuit was filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York accusing Pumpfun and the Solana ecosystem of operating a coordinated illegal scheme that allegedly wiped out between 4 and 5.5 billion USD of retail investor capital. The case frames Pumpfun not as a neutral launchpad, but as a deliberately engineered digital casino embedded into Solana’s core infrastructure. The plaintiffs rely on US securities law, federal RICO statutes, and New York consumer protection law. If successful, the defendants face treble damages under RICO. That would raise potential liability to approximately 16.5 billion USD. Pumpfun launched in January 2024 and quickly became the dominant memecoin factory on Solana. According to the complaint, the platform generated more than 850 million USD in cumulative fee revenue within roughly 14 months. The mechanism was simple. Anyone could mint and trade tokens without identity verification, disclosures, or risk warnings. Pumpfun charged a 1 percent fee on every transaction. Between January 2024 and March 2025, users launched more than 7 million tokens. Approximately 98.6 percent of them collapsed to near zero value. Plaintiffs argue that this failure rate was not accidental but intrinsic to the system design, which allegedly maximised churn and fee extraction rather than sustainable markets. The lawsuit describes Pumpfun as an unlicensed gambling platform where users bet on random price movements without regulatory oversight, disclosures, or consumer protections. Baton Corporation Ltd., the UK based operator of Pumpfun, is led by three founders in their early 20s. CEO Noah Bernhard Hugo Tweedale is 21. CTO Dylan Kerler is 21. COO Alon Cohen is 23. All three are named individually as defendants. Under Section 15 of the Securities Act, the plaintiffs argue that the founders acted as control persons and knowingly facilitated the sale of unregistered securities. The complaint alleges no SEC registration, no prospectuses, and no meaningful disclosure of risks to retail users. The original lawsuit filed in January 2025 targeted only Baton Corporation and its founders. The July 2025 consolidated complaint dramatically expanded the scope. New defendants include Solana Labs, the Solana Foundation, and senior leadership figures such as Anatoly Yakovenko, Raj Gokal, and Solana Foundation president Lily Liu. The plaintiffs claim that Solana provided not just neutral infrastructure but active technical coordination that enabled Pumpfun’s scale and behaviour. This alleged coordination forms the backbone of the RICO enterprise theory. The complaint accuses the defendants of forming a criminal enterprise referred to as the Pump Enterprise. Alleged predicate acts include wire fraud, securities fraud, unlicensed money transmission, and facilitation of illegal gambling. RICO was originally designed to combat organised crime. Its application here signals that the plaintiffs view the memecoin economy not as a regulatory grey area but as systemic financial exploitation. A key escalation occurred in September 2025. Plaintiffs obtained more than 5000 internal chat messages from a confidential informant. According to court filings, these logs allegedly document direct communication between Solana Labs engineers and Pumpfun personnel. The discussions reportedly cover token program behaviour, validator mechanics, priority inclusion paths, and launch flow design. Plaintiffs argue this proves intentional coordination rather than passive infrastructure provision. Shortly after these logs surfaced, Jito Labs and the Jito Foundation were voluntarily dismissed from the case without settlement. The court confirmed no compensation or concessions were exchanged. The plaintiffs stated they were narrowing the case to focus on Pumpfun and Solana. Court decision in December 2025: On December 16 2025, Judge Colleen McMahon granted the plaintiffs permission to file a second amended complaint. This allows them to restructure their allegations using the leaked communications and to further detail how the platform architecture allegedly prioritised extraction over fairness. The deadline to file the amended complaint is December 19 2025. Defendants must respond with motions to dismiss by January 23 2026. Plaintiffs must reply by February 13 2026. If the amended complaint survives dismissal, the case becomes one of the most consequential enforcement actions ever aimed at crypto infrastructure rather than individual tokens. Beyond RICO, the lawsuit argues that Pumpfun tokens qualify as securities under the Howey test. Plaintiffs claim users invested money in a common enterprise with an expectation of profit driven by the platform’s marketing, visibility mechanics, and network effects. They allege violations of Sections 5a and 5c of the Securities Act due to the sale of unregistered securities. Additional claims include deceptive business practices under New York General Business Law Sections 349 and 350 and unjust enrichment. This lawsuit directly challenges the long held assumption that blockchain infrastructure providers are analogous to neutral hosting services. If the court accepts the plaintiffs’ theory, blockchain foundations and protocol developers could face liability for downstream economic activity enabled by their systems. For Solana, the stakes are existential. Beyond financial exposure, the case threatens its reputation as a leading Layer 1 network. More broadly, it could redefine legal responsibility across memecoin platforms, launchpads, and high throughput blockchains. At the same time, the outcome is uncertain. Recent rulings in cases involving Ripple and Coinbase have narrowed the application of securities law to secondary market transactions. Regulatory enforcement by the SEC has also slowed under the current administration. This case sits at the intersection of infrastructure design, behavioural finance, and systemic risk. Regardless of outcome, it marks a turning point in how memecoin economies are legally and morally evaluated. Let’s see what happens. What are your thoughts on this?

11:42am, bro is already in another time zone?

🚨 BREAKING: PumpFun has confirmed that senior team member Alon has passed away following a reported asthma attack. His recent inactivity had raised concern, and the news has now shocked the crypto community. Alon was a key contributor to one of the industry’s largest launchpads. Rest in peace. Condolences to his family, friends, and the PumpFun team.

FUN FACT: 15 years ago today, Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared after posting on the Bitcoin Forum for the last time.

🚨 HUGE: The crypto market lost $90B in an hour.