Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

33.8K posts

Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง banner
Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

@kellro36

My opinions are my own. Stop knife crime . Right of centre, always open for debate ๐Ÿ‘

United Kingdom ๊ฐ€์ž…์ผ Kasฤฑm 2019
16.8K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰15.8K ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ
Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Jim Chimirie ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
Jim Chimirie ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง@JChimirie66677ยท
Mandelson and Gates Both Knew Epstein. Starmer Welcomed Both Anyway. Jeffrey Epstein did not collect friendships. He collected positions. Every relationship he cultivated was an asset, every dinner table a transaction, every introduction a thread he could pull. When he brought Bill Gates and Peter Mandelson together at his New York townhouse in 2011, he was not playing host. He was building inventory. He boasted about it afterwards in emails to Mandelson, describing his time with Gates as "monstrous fun." Epstein was the broker. The access was the product. The men around the table were the collateral. Keir Starmer did not know every detail of this. That defence is available to him. What is not available to him is ignorance of the broader picture. By the time he entered Downing Street, the outline was public. Mandelson's Epstein friendship had been reported, documented, and referenced in a JPMorgan internal investigation. The ethics report on his desk named Mandelson's continued association with a convicted paedophile in bold, three times. None of it was hidden. All of it was ignored. Within months of the election, Gates arrived at Downing Street alongside Mark Suzman the CEO of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, met jointly by Starmer and Rachel Reeves. He was received as a global authority whose judgement deserved deference. No questions were asked about his own documented Epstein connections. The cause was virtuous. The access was valuable. Nine weeks later, Mandelson was appointed to Washington. His Epstein links had been flagged in the due diligence report. The ethics chief's offer to probe them had been rejected twice. The vetting was handed to his personal friends, who cleared him without difficulty. The same logic governed both decisions. These men were useful, and usefulness purchased exemption. That is not naivety on Starmer's part. It is the operating assumption of someone who believes that within a certain circle, normal scrutiny does not apply. Epstein understood this better than anyone. It was his entire business model. He cultivated powerful people carefully, made himself indispensable, ensured the cost of distance exceeded the cost of proximity. The men who remained close after his conviction did not stay because they were naive. They stayed because the calculation still worked. Starmer inherited a political world shaped by these relationships and chose to work within it. He appointed Morgan McSweeney, Mandelson's political protรฉgรฉ, as chief of staff. He appointed Matthew Doyle, Mandelson's personal friend, as director of communications. He then handed both men the job of deciding whether Mandelson was fit for the most sensitive diplomatic posting in British foreign policy. When the Civil Service offered to ask the hard questions, his office said no. The network was asked to examine itself and declined, as networks always do. The Mandelson Files do not show a vetting process that failed. They show one that was never meant to succeed. A Prime Minister was warned in writing. He arranged the process to ensure the warning went no further. He then welcomed into Downing Street another figure whose Epstein connections were documented and unexamined. He was not deceived by a network he didn't know existed. He was operating inside one he understood perfectly. That is the judgment the country must now make. Not whether the system failed him. Whether he ever intended it to work. "[Gates] was received as a global authority whose judgement deserved deference. No questions were asked about his own documented Epstein connections. The cause was virtuous. The access was valuable. Nine weeks later, Mandelson was appointed to Washington."
Jim Chimirie ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง tweet mediaJim Chimirie ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง tweet media
English
26
211
467
8.7K
Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Gauci Reports
Gauci Reports@GauciReportsยท
๐ŸšจBOMBSHELL: Morgan McSweeney's phone - filled with messages to Peter Mandelson was "stolen" last year! Officials now say key texts "may be lost forever" just as the parliamentary probe into Mandelson heats up. How convenient. ๐Ÿ˜ Nothing to see here, move along... Classic Westminster magic trick. Who's buying this one? ๐Ÿคฅ๐Ÿ’ฉ
Gauci Reports tweet media
English
217
394
1K
15.2K
Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Bramley Moore
Bramley Moore@NotfarWยท
@BasilTheGreat @kellro36 Listen the police when they arrest villains they can get every text ever sent or received from a phone number !! Itโ€™s bollox also these days everything is in the cloud .
English
1
5
16
195
Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Jim Chimirie ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
Jim Chimirie ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง@JChimirie66677ยท
Criminally Negligent. Andrew Neil's Words. Britain's Reality. Andrew Neil does not use language carelessly. Writing in the Daily Mail this morning, he describes Britain as stuck in an energy emergency with an oil and gas policy bordering on the criminally negligent, delivered by a bunch of clueless inadequates at the tiller. He is not reaching for effect. He is delivering a verdict. And the evidence he marshals is unanswerable. The Strait of Hormuz has been closed for the first time in history. Oil is heading toward two hundred dollars a barrel. Britain is facing the worst energy crisis since the Yom Kippur War of 1973. The International Energy Agency has described the supply disruption as the largest in history. And the government overseeing this catastrophe has spent the past year doing everything in its power to ensure Britain would be maximally exposed when it arrived. It closed North Sea oil and gas production. It borrowed against already strained public finances. It built an economic strategy on OBR forecasts that the energy crisis has already rendered obsolete. And it put the man most responsible for Britain's energy vulnerability, Ed Miliband, in charge of the response. The Miliband contradiction has been hiding in plain sight for months. He stood at the despatch box during the energy debate last year and warned that Britain was a price taker not a price maker in international fossil fuel markets, leaving it exposed to their volatility. He was right. He was also the man who ensured that exposure would be as severe as possible by closing down the domestic production that could have cushioned the blow. The North Sea fields that could have been producing. The coal beds that remain untouched. The nuclear capacity that was decommissioned in pursuit of net zero targets that now look like a luxury policy designed for a world that no longer exists. Miliband diagnosed the disease and administered the poison. Rachel Reeves now faces the consequences. The fiscal headroom she has been defending against every request for defence spending, every demand from the Treasury and every warning from military chiefs, is being wiped out not by defence costs alone but by the energy price shock her own government's choices made inevitable. Her foundations, as Neil puts it, are built on quicksand. The borrowing costs are rising at the fastest pace since the Liz Truss mini-budget. Foreign creditors are watching. The bond markets are watching. And the Chancellor is discovering that the numbers she has been citing as proof of fiscal responsibility were always dependent on a stable world that this government's foreign policy paralysis helped to destabilise. Neil makes one observation that connects the economic catastrophe to the political one with surgical precision. A stronger Prime Minister would have fired Miliband. He is right. The man who led the Cabinet revolt against supporting America, who blocked the use of Diego Garcia, who has spent a year dismantling Britain's energy independence and who stood at the despatch box admitting British households would pay the price, is still in his post. Still in the Cabinet. Still in the room. The reason Starmer has not fired him is the same reason he needed a drone on his own runway before he would act, the same reason he consulted his team on minesweepers and the same reason Britain is now a diminished, exposed and strategically paralysed country being described in its own press as a nation of clueless inadequates. He cannot afford to. The coalition that put him in power will not allow it. And so the inadequates remain at the tiller while Britain heads for the rocks. "Miliband diagnosed the disease and administered the poison. [...]. Rachel Reeves now faces the consequences."
Jim Chimirie ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง tweet mediaJim Chimirie ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง tweet media
English
128
1.6K
4.3K
57.9K
Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Furkan Gรถzรผkara
Furkan Gรถzรผkara@FurkanGozukaraยท
You literally cannot make this up. The Prime Minister's Chief of Staff had his phone "stolen" with all his messages to Lord Mandelson, and conveniently there is ZERO backup. They are treating the public like absolute fools.
English
405
2.9K
10.8K
202.7K
Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Basil the Great
Basil the Great@BasilTheGreatยท
๐ŸšจMORGAN MCSWEENEY TEXTS TO PETER MANDELSON LOST FOREVER AFTER 'PHONE STOLEN' I don't know about you but this sounds like the biggest load of BS There's no way that phone just happened to be stolen Labour are covering their tracks They don't want the truth getting out
Basil the Great tweet media
English
382
1K
3.9K
33.7K
Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Make Britain Great Again
Make Britain Great Again@UK_Needs_Reformยท
Any country that strikes oil, has trillions of m3 of gas under their feet, along with hundreds of years of coal reserves and ends up with a population of people living in border line fuel poverty, it's government that has failed them .....
Make Britain Great Again tweet media
English
171
3.1K
9.1K
78.8K
Imtiaz Mahmood
Imtiaz Mahmood@ImtiazMadmoodยท
Atefeh Rajabi Sahaaleh, was a 16 year old girl from Neka in Iran's Mazandaran Province. A lovely happy girl enjoying her life. One day while travelling in a taxi she was arrested by the morality police for not wearing a hijab. She endured days of torture and rape at the hands of Captains Zabihi and Molai, who later confessed to misconduct amid family complaints and global outrage. Brought before Judge Haji Reza, stumbling and bleeding from repeated assaults, she begged Judge Reza for justice and punishment of her tormentors. Instead he passed a sentence for her to be executed for the crime of Adultery and Chastity.(The poor girl was raped and tortured in captivity) In defiance of her death sentence, she tore off her hijab and threw it at his feet. On August 15, 2004, she was publicly hanged from a crane in Neka's town square. (The judge himself later admitted to raping and torturing her during interrogations. - @israelititan
Imtiaz Mahmood tweet media
English
539
3.2K
6K
130.8K
Basil the Great
Basil the Great@BasilTheGreatยท
๐ŸšจCOMIC RELIEF FLOPS WITH LOWEST RATINGS EVER LAST NIGHT In just over a decade viewership has dropped by over 80% They've supported immigration to the UK and funded migrant charities for years The British public have had enough 2026 - 2m 2025 - 2.6m 2024 - 3.7m 2023 - 2.9m 2022 - 3.5m 2021 - 4.5m 2019 - 5.8m 2017 - 6.3m 2015 - 8.4m 2013 - 10.3m 2011 - 10.2m
Basil the Great tweet media
English
950
1.4K
8.8K
489.6K
Ben Graham
Ben Graham@BenGrahamUKยท
China builds nuclear power plants in 5โ€“7 years. South Korea does it in 6โ€“8. Britain? Hinkley Point C began in 2016 and wonโ€™t be online until 2029โ€“2031. Thatโ€™s up to 15 years. This isnโ€™t about capability. Itโ€™s about incentives, regulation, and political will. China & Korea build. Britain delays.
Ben Graham tweet media
English
168
472
2K
37.8K
Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Jim Chimirie ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
Jim Chimirie ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง@JChimirie66677ยท
@ZackPolanski, Iran fired two ballistic missiles at Diego Garcia, the joint US-UK base in the Indian Ocean. Neither hit their target but the significance goes far beyond this engagement. Diego Garcia is a 4,000 kilometres from Iran. Iran's foreign minister said last month that Iran had limited its missile range to 2,000 kilometres. That was a lie. And the implications of that lie are ones that every European leader, every Green Party politician and every opponent of this operation needs to confront. Missiles that can reach Diego Garcia can reach virtually every capital city in Europe. London. Paris. Berlin. Rome. The threat you are demanding Britain appease just revealed it can hit further than anyone publicly acknowledged. Now let's address who started this war since you seem confused. Iran built, funded and directed Hezbollah for thirty years. Iran built, funded and directed Hamas, which carried out the October 7th massacres. Iran built, funded and directed the Houthis, who have been attacking international shipping for over a year. Iran supplied the drones and ballistic missiles Russia has been using to kill Ukrainian civilians. Iran plotted twenty assassinations on British soil in two years, every one of them thwarted by British security services. Iran hit RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus. Iran has been blockading the Strait of Hormuz, collapsing Gulf oil exports by sixty per cent and driving up the energy bills of the British households you claim to represent. And lest we forget what this regime does to its own people: it has massacred over thirty thousand of its own citizens who dared to protest against it, hanged dissidents in public, executed gay people and imprisoned women for removing their hijabs. This is not a government that deserves the benefit of the doubt. It is a theocratic killing machine that has been at war with its own people and the wider world simultaneously. Iran started this. It has been starting it, in one form or another, since 1979. On the promise of a parliamentary vote: Starmer made that commitment as Labour leader running for his own party's leadership in 2020. He was not Prime Minister. He had no constitutional authority to bind future governments. The convention, as he has explained, is that votes apply to offensive deployments of troops, not defensive operations conducted at speed. You know this. You are citing it anyway because it is the only procedural argument left when the substantive ones have collapsed. You lead a party that has never condemned Hamas. Never condemned Hezbollah. Never condemned the Iranian regime that funds both and has just fired ballistic missiles at a British base. Your concern for British military personnel and civilians rings hollow this morning. The regime you have consistently refused to condemn just tried to hit a base housing British forces. That is the context in which your statement lands. And it lands very badly indeed. "This is not a government that deserves the benefit of the doubt. It is a theocratic killing machine that has been at war with its own people and the wider world simultaneously."
Jim Chimirie ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง tweet media
English
101
561
1.5K
19.3K
Basil the Great
Basil the Great@BasilTheGreatยท
Why do British people convert to Islam?
English
3.1K
253
1.5K
707.3K
Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
J Stewart
J Stewart@triffic_stuff_ยท
๐ŸšจSTARMER AND MILIBAND ARE DESTROYING BRITAIN'S ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE AT THE WORST POSSIBLE TIME! โšก๏ธ๐Ÿ›ข๏ธ Labour's Destructive Net Zero Agenda Is Being Exposed For The World To See Itโ€™s actually infuriating what theyโ€™re doing to this country. While the world grapples with a raging global energy crisis, Middle East conflicts have shut down key routes through the Strait of Hormuz, spiking oil and gas prices and creating massive supply risks. At this exact moment Starmer and Miliband are closing down our own refineries and sabotaging our ability to generate our own energy. Grangemouth and Lindsey shut in 2025, slashing the UKโ€™s total from six to just four. Labourโ€™s crippling carbon taxes and emissions trading scheme have made British refining unviable. ExxonMobil warned the remaining plants could follow without urgent relief, yet Miliband doubles down on the green zealotry. Instead of backing domestic North Sea production, they push unreliable renewables and ban new oil and gas licences. This forces Britain into dangerous dependence on volatile overseas supplies exactly when the world is most unstable. Their reckless Net Zero obsession is being exposed for the world to see, destroying jobs, hiking bills and weakening national security. This is economic suicide and it has to stop!
J Stewart tweet media
J Stewart@triffic_stuff_

๐ŸšจBOMBSHELL: STARMER & MILIBAND'S NET ZERO FANTASY SHATTERED โ€“ ENERGY CEOs REVEAL BILLS WILL STAY SKY-HIGH EVEN IF WHOLESALE POWER COSTS ZERO! ๐Ÿ’ฃ ๐Ÿคฏ MUST WATCHโ€ผ๏ธ Energy Suppliers Plead With Government To Scrap Green Levies Forcing Bills Through The Roof , Testimony Straight From Parliament Demolishes All Labour Net Zero Claimsโšก๏ธ๐Ÿ’ก In a devastating blow to Keir Starmer and Ed Miliband's net zero dream, Britain's major energy suppliers laid bare the harsh reality in Parliament on 15 October 2025: Labour's green policies are driving household bills relentlessly upward, regardless of what happens to global gas or wholesale prices. Ed Miliband has repeatedly insisted that high energy bills stem purely from volatile global fossil fuel markets. That narrative has now been comprehensively demolished by the very industry executives Labour claims to champion. Chris Norbury, CEO of E.ON UK, delivered the killer line that exposes the whole net zero con: "Some of the modelling that we have suggests that you could get to a position by 2030 where if the wholesale price was zero, bills would still be the same as they are today because of the increase in those non-commodity costs." This means astonishingly even if wholesale costs fell to zero, bills would STILL not fall, and could even rise further, due to the explosion in policy-driven charges. Rachel Fletcher, Director of Regulation and Economics at Octopus Energy, piled on the pressure with equally brutal warnings: "If we continue on the path weโ€™re on now, electricity prices are going to be 20% higher in 4 or 5 years time than they are now. And thatโ€™s even if wholesale prices halve." "Non-commodity costs are adding about ยฃ300 onto a typical bill." "The country as a whole at the moment, is paying over ยฃ20 billion a year on their electricity bills for policy costs. The projections are that that is going to increase. That will add another ยฃ100 to bills over the next four years." These non-commodity costs, green levies, renewable subsidies, network upgrades for electrification, and constraint payments to turn off excess wind power, are the direct result of the net zero agenda pushed by Miliband and Starmer. Energy bosses are effectively pleading with the government to scrap or reform the green levies that are forcing bills through the roof. This testimony, straight from the suppliers' mouths in a formal parliamentary session, fully demolishes Labour's claims that net zero will deliver cheaper energy for families. The evidence is undeniable: net zero isn't saving money, it's baking in permanently higher bills, even in a dream scenario of free wholesale power. Scrap net zero now!!

English
13
82
106
3.3K
Bridget Phillipson
Bridget Phillipson@bphillipsonMPยท
This week Labour ended the two child limit. Change like that only comes when you vote for it. Out in Coatbridge at lunchtime today with the fantastic @HigginsKieron talking with local people about the change Scotland needs that only @ScottishLabour can bring.
Bridget Phillipson tweet media
English
336
54
215
37.3K
Robert King ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneilยท
ANDREW NEIL: Weโ€™re heading into what could be the greatest energy emergency ever with a bunch of clueless inadequates at the tiller mol.im/a/15665931
English
671
4.2K
17.4K
341.7K
1876
1876@SenseInACesspitยท
@kellro36 Why arenโ€™t you speaking up on 86% of rapists being white?
English
6
0
5
355
MUSLIM_PATROL
MUSLIM_PATROL@Muslim_Patrolยท
@kellro36 Hi Robert. Sounds like you care about the safety and well being of women in the UK. Is that right?
English
1
0
0
212