Iftekher Naser
660 posts

고정된 트윗
Iftekher Naser 리트윗함

This is so beautiful. And so important to study. This phenomena (emergent coherence) is central to much of life, and most people don't even imagine it could happen.
Interesting STEM@InterestingSTEM
They capture the exact moment when a developing heart shifts from silence to its first beat. There is no “switch”: many cells gradually become active and, upon crossing a critical threshold, the entire tissue suddenly synchronizes.
English

@PalmerLuckey @grok why using mouse brain cells is better than using a silicone based circuit ?
English

@KeithWoodsYT Complexity ≠ design. Snowflakes are complex because physics demands structure—no designer needed. Design comes in when there’s specificity for a purpose. Physics gives patterns; design explains intent.
English

There was an influential atheist philosopher named Antony Flew who converted to philosophical theism late in life, after concluding that the complexity and information content of DNA couldn’t be explained by unguided material processes.
Even though religious people are generally hostile to evolution, I don’t think you can give a proper account of complexity like this emerging in an entropic universe without proposing some kind of purposive drive in nature.
Andrew Côté@Andercot
It just seems implausible this is what we are made of, essentially, nanotechnology about a billion years beyond anything we can design or make ourselves.
English

@SlappinBongos @Andercot A mind has purpose, therefore a mind also requires a higher mind.... to infinity.
English

@sambam_at @Andercot Complexity ≠ design. Snowflakes are complex because physics demands structure—no designer needed. Design comes in when there’s specificity for a purpose. Physics gives patterns; design explains intent.
English

@ducavendish @sulaimanghori The carnival thing
Whitby, Ontario 🇨🇦 English

@sulaimanghori There was that one thing you said during the podcast that wasn't smart.
Anyway, you're young and bright, and hopefully you've learned a lesson.
Keep bringing us closer to ASI! 👊
English

A very insightful article! A must read for those who want to shape their lives for better.
Three different points/quotes in the article which I really like-
1- “If you want a specific outcome in life, you must have the lifestyle that creates that outcome long before you reach it”
2- “High intelligence is the ability to iterate, persist, and understand the big picture. The mark of low intelligence is the inability to learn from your mistakes.”
3- “The best periods of my life always came after a period of getting absolutely fed up with the lack of progress I was making.”
DAN KOE@thedankoe
English


The first step to change your life is if you can read this article in one go with full attention. Many people can’t. Attention span is broken. Force yourself.
DAN KOE@thedankoe
English

All these kinds of people piss me off so much man
Just build something people need
If you can’t, then build something people want.
That’s all.
Clifton Sellers@CliftonSellers
English

This article has almost as much reach as the viral Nick Shirley video
This energy is way more positive…
Love having this energy on my timeline.
DAN KOE@thedankoe
English

summary of article:
gaslight yourself into being someone else and you’ll magically change
DAN KOE@thedankoe
English

We sometimes forget that social media is a recent invention and that if it existed from time immemorial, most books would not exist. There’s no difference between a book and a well written Twitter article, functionally. But many performative people here would “book” mark that article and swear they will NEVER read a self help book.
There is nothing in that article that isn’t well documented in various self help books and just like the article is not self-enforcing, no self help books is intended to hand-hold you through personal development, at best they give you insights or perspectives. But ironically, only books get the flak for being too abstract, too subjective and what-not.
It is far more intellectually honest to admit (1) that you don’t like reading certain genres of books because they’re more cognitively demanding as opposed to other genres that are more relaxing, or (2) that the structured nature of books in general can induce anxiety and you prefer to stumble on interesting things to read (which social media makes easy). These are perfectly reasonable reasons.
What is utterly performative is the continuous denigration of a sub category of books as serving no purpose, when the vast majority of people barely read ANY books. Unsurprisingly, the people who really like reading are the ones likely to read that long article for the same reason they would casually pick up a book to read. Self help or otherwise.
Most of you here perform your intelligence as you perform your criticisms. Neither is that deep.
DAN KOE@thedankoe
English













