Manish Bhatia

855 posts

Manish Bhatia

Manish Bhatia

@manishquacking

CTO & Co-Founder Zynk | CTO @AmazonPay | President Technology @Lendingkart | Thinker

India 가입일 Ağustos 2012
153 팔로잉381 팔로워
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
Customer empathy is powerful — but it doesn’t scale. Empathy is often 1:1. Human. Reactive. Customer obsession, on the other hand, is designed. It asks a different question: 👉 Why does the customer need to reach out at all? True customer-obsessed organizations:
English
1
0
0
15
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
Be worried but not scared...
English
0
0
0
17
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
Whoever abstracts both layers wins. Because the future stack won’t expose complexity. It will route value seamlessly across domains — invisible to the user, programmable under the hood. That’s where the next generation of infrastructure is being built.
English
1
0
0
15
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
Everyone talks about multi-chain. But the real challenge is multi-domain. Bank rails. Stablecoins. Smart contracts. AI agents. Chain-to-chain interoperability is just one layer.
English
1
0
0
27
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
Payments won’t just be triggered. Treasury will be programmable. If exposure > cap → rebalance If balance < threshold → bridge liquidity If settlement delay > SLA → reroute rails Money movement becomes execution logic, not manual ops.
English
0
0
0
11
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
Liquidity fragmentation is a hidden tax. Multi-chain world + manual treasury = idle capital. Routing + automation collapses that tax. Capital efficiency becomes a competitive advantage.
English
0
0
0
11
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
Wrapped models fragment liquidity. Canonical issuance compresses risk. But without programmable routing, you still get capital inefficiency. Automation is the unlock.
English
1
0
1
13
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
Bridging isn’t moving tokens. It’s: Where is capital sitting? Where is demand? What’s the cheapest finality path? That’s routing logic — not UX.
English
0
0
0
11
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
Agentic payments = streaming value. Event → Intent → Auth → Settlement. Milliseconds. Not invoices. Not T+2. Not ops teams.
English
0
0
0
24
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
High-frequency payments break legacy rails because: Auth cost > value Settlement latency > API latency Reconciliation > execution time Machine commerce needs money to behave like compute. Elastic. Programmable. Instant.
English
0
0
0
28
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
If an AI agent runs 40k API calls/day at $0.02 each: That’s 40k micro-settlements. Cards fail. Batch treasury fails. Manual ops fail. Micropayments are not a checkout feature. They are an infrastructure layer. #AIAgents #AgenticCommerce #MachineToMachine
English
0
0
0
28
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
Agents don’t “click confirm”. They: Generate intent Sign Execute Payments for agents require: Machine identity Deterministic auth Liquidity routing Instant settlement The current stack assumes humans. That assumption is breaking.
English
0
0
0
20
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
The ledger emits real-time events so reconciliation isn’t a separate system — it’s part of the flow. The goal was simple: Money should move with the same determinism as a database commit. That’s what we mean by instant settlement infrastructure.
English
1
0
1
48
Manish Bhatia
Manish Bhatia@manishquacking·
Most “instant settlement” claims are just faster batching. We wanted something stricter: one transaction, one settlement, no waiting for cycles, no prefunding math in spreadsheets. So we built Zynk around atomic settlement primitives.
English
1
1
6
259