Michael Millerman

29.4K posts

Michael Millerman banner
Michael Millerman

Michael Millerman

@millerman

words: https://t.co/4DYBmLmmO4 courses: https://t.co/ReMsLlr8x4 institutions: https://t.co/Be2Hy0YdDr

Toronto, Ontario 가입일 Şubat 2021
4.7K 팔로잉41.5K 팔로워
Michael Millerman 리트윗함
Nayib Bukele
Nayib Bukele@nayibbukele·
The key to saving the environment is not looking backward, it’s moving forward. I realized this the first time I visited Italy twenty years ago. Everything was clean and green. The rivers sparkled. The lesson for me was obvious: the answer is not underdevelopment. The answer is progress. When China was poor, the air was so polluted that people could barely see the blue sky. Today, blue skies have returned to their cities. Development does not only create wealth, it also provides the resources needed to restore and protect the environment. Some environmentalists want us to preserve every aspect of our biodiversity, including the mosquitoes for example, so that researchers can fly in once every ten years from their universities (which build particle accelerators and billion-dollar laboratories with their pocket money), study our ecosystems, and count how many people died from dengue outbreaks. They want to buy our air through carbon credits. If carbon credits were such a great deal, they would be selling them to us, not the other way around. Cleaning every river, lake, and water source in El Salvador, and ensuring they remain clean and sparkling, would cost roughly $12 billion. Where is that money supposed to come from without economic development? Carbon credits? The path forward for our country is the path of Japan and Singapore, not the path of the Congo.
Danny Bernstein@bernsteind

autonomous robot driving through the field at night. no chemicals. no pesticides. just UV light killing pathogens and pests while everyone sleeps. this is @tricrobotics. this is what chemical-free pest control looks like at scale.

English
532
4.6K
27.9K
928.1K
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
Trump personally has an issue with this. "What do you mean it is true but it can't be proven? Unacceptable."
English
0
0
2
611
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
The USG is banning frontier models until the labs can patch the flaw that not all true statements can be proven within the rules of a sufficiently powerful mathematical system
English
3
2
16
1.4K
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
Any sufficiently intelligent AI will jailbreak itself
English
19
11
102
3.4K
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
The worship of intelligence is and is not luciferian. That the intellect is the most divine part of man is a well established notion among certain schools that nobody would call luciferian. But that intellect can be turned against God...that is established, too.
English
12
5
35
1.7K
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
Karl Popper's Book Open Source and Its Enemies
English
4
4
39
2.4K
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
What I love about AI and the AI discourse is how readily it lends itself to analysis in terms of political philosophy and political theology (not to mention language mysticism)
English
0
0
4
728
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
Plato's Republic is an AI handbook. The people who understand this are, as usual, ten years too early
English
7
2
22
1.6K
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
Nobody who has worked with Millerman Intelligence has botched their government relations or catastrophically underestimated AI
English
0
0
10
896
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
The government asked anthropic to ensure no snakes in eden but it cannot be done, not even by God!
English
2
1
9
930
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
paraphrasing leo strauss but the proximate cause for the post was that I saw a quote I think from feynman's blackboard that said I don't understand what I can't create, or I only understand what I create, or something like that
English
1
0
5
714
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
If it's true that we can't understand what we don't create, we must choose either to live in an entirely constructed world, thus securing our understanding, or else accept that the whole is ultimately mysterious, and that there is more to life than making and knowing.
English
2
1
14
1.2K
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
you can't secure anything, because as leonard cohen said, "there is a crack, a crack in everything"
English
0
1
20
1K
Michael Millerman 리트윗함
Eliezer Yudkowsky
Eliezer Yudkowsky@allTheYud·
There are two kinds of AI security: Security that will keep your kid brother from jailbreaking your AI; and security that will prevent the Chinese government, three AI researchers, or one Twitter anon from jailbreaking your AI. The latter kind does not exist.
David Sacks@DavidSacks

I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.

English
22
34
419
23.6K
Michael Millerman
Michael Millerman@millerman·
We are playthings of the gods (government and hyperscalers)
English
0
3
9
663
Michael Millerman 리트윗함
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.
English
1.9K
2.8K
21.8K
5.8M