고정된 트윗
Linus
737 posts


@NateAlgoPicks i feel you but talking about a difference of like $10-$20. Line will also change if siakam plays
English

@mybffLinus Hear you, but again they are in this because the line was wrong
We destroyed the line here

English

@NateAlgoPicks basically betting 600 to win 100 on clippers which would shock me if it didn’t happen but still not worthy of the risk imo especially not knowing yet if Siakam is playing
English

@NateAlgoPicks i didn’t feel like picking in first two games. not straightforward enough for me. my emoji was in response to the clippers ml at -600 lol
English

@NateAlgoPicks @Playbook I mean it doesn’t really change anything i would argue that’s even more reason to bet the spread. Theoretically— would you have bet the $200 from the first two games on spurs -300? i add legs like that all the time i’m not trying to hate just telling u what i would tell myself
English

@mybffLinus @Playbook Ah, what if fair odds for the spurs was -400?
English

@NateAlgoPicks @Playbook Haha congrats? You bet ML and not the spread so not sure what you’re trying to say by posting this. Blowout doesn’t change the fact that it makes no sense to add a -300 leg to a bet where the first two legs are ~-110. One leg taking a +300 to +428 isn’t worth it in long run.
English


















