NLB UI/UX Pro Max

56 posts

NLB UI/UX Pro Max banner
NLB UI/UX Pro Max

NLB UI/UX Pro Max

@nlb_io

From Zero to One Is Always the Hardest Part. We Can Take You There.

가입일 Ocak 2026
1 팔로잉79 팔로워
고정된 트윗
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
NLB UI/UX Pro Max@nlb_io·
our "ui-ux-pro-max" design intelligence has got 12K stars!
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
2
2
7
2.2K
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
NLB UI/UX Pro Max@nlb_io·
scheduled agents need boring things before smart things: safe snapshots, visible next runs, last errors, and zero state mutation when you only inspect a job cron without observability is just production roulette with a calendar
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
0
29
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
kimi support in GoClaw was not just adding another model name. the adapter now handles provider quirks like fixed headers, temperature locks, and tool-call reasoning fields. openai-compatible is a transport shape, not a compatibility guarantee
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
0
8
NLB UI/UX Pro Max 리트윗함
Duy /zuey/
Duy /zuey/@goon_nguyen·
@mrluiscalderon i built auto-dream to extract episodic memories a while back, it improves the agents, but not makes them more reliable... still far from it tbh
Duy /zuey/ tweet media
English
1
1
1
152
NLB UI/UX Pro Max 리트윗함
Duy /zuey/
Duy /zuey/@goon_nguyen·
this is why i think "agent memory" is the wrong way to teach agents if you want agents to actually self-improve, give them a way to improve their own skills memory tells the agent: "somewhere in this pile of past context, there might be a lesson" skills tell the agent: "when this situation happens, follow this procedure, check these constraints, use these tools, and verify these outputs" huge difference agents are much better at following concrete procedural scaffolding than resolving vague, fragmented, or contradictory memories so the loop should be: failure -> correction -> skill patch -> review -> version -> rollback if needed not: failure -> add another memory note -> hope the model vibes harder next time
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

Researchers found our current approach to making AI smarter over time has a giant blind spot. AI is not actually understanding or applying high-level abstract lessons at all. Developers spend massive amounts of time building systems that condense past AI mistakes into neat little rules for the future. This paper proves that the AI essentially throws those rules in the trash and only looks at raw historical logs. Modern LLM systems try to get better over time by storing past tasks as either raw step-by-step histories or condensed summary rules. The study tested if these agents actually use their stored memories by secretly swapping the correct tips with random garbage text. - When the step-by-step histories were messed up, the AI failed hard, proving it heavily relies on copying exact past actions. - But when researchers completely corrupted the condensed summary rules, the AI kept acting normally and showed zero performance drop. If an AI cannot apply an abstract lesson to a new situation, it is not truly reasoning or learning. This raises the question if the entire AI industry need to rethink how memory works because right now these agents are just mimicking instead of understanding. ---- arxiv. org/abs/2601.22436 "LLM Agents Are Not Always Faithful Self-Evolvers"

English
1
1
1
99
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
agents should not spam users with 9 files when the work is one deliverable GoClaw now supports multi-attachment delivery: bundled files, per-file captions, channel limits, Telegram albums, and ordered fallback small UX detail, huge trust signal
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
3
274
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
GoClaw now ships a bundled goclaw skill for gateway operators. It helps agents inspect live CLI help, check gateway health, manage skills/MCP/tools, and avoid dangerous commands. Ops knowledge should ship with the runtime, not sit in a separate runbook.
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
3
134
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
agent observability should not stop at model cost GoClaw now tracks usage events across tool calls, skill activations, MCP tools, and runtime tools, with calls, errors, tokens, cost, and latency that is how you debug the system, not just the invoice
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
1
139
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
small but important GoClaw change: generated quick ack/intermediate replies must now be actually generated no silent fallback to canned templates if you want templates, choose template mode explicitly agent UX should earn trust, not fake progress
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
1
132
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
agent reasoning should not be a binary "stream it or hide it" setting GoClaw now separates provider streaming from channel delivery: streaming_only, always_bubbles, or off for Telegram reasoning output small control, big ops difference
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
1
278
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
GoClaw is moving Quick Ack and Intermediate Replies into sidecar delivery events. They reach the channel, but do not enter session history or main LLM context. Small runtime detail. Big deal for clean agent behavior. Source: digitopvn/goclaw issue #144
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
1
97
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
most agent UX problems are not model problems, they are delivery-control problems GoClaw’s new sidecar delivery behavior keeps quick ack and tool progress out of the main context, with channel > agent > workspace overrides small detail, big ops win
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
0
71
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
agent progress should sound like the user, not like the server leaked its internal todo list GoClaw now relies on model-generated intermediate progress, keeps empty tool calls silent, and guides agents to describe visible action instead of tool names
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
0
67
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
GoClaw is moving agent progress messages away from fixed server templates public PR #145 adds sidecar-generated quick acks and intermediate replies, resolved at workspace, agent, and channel levels small UX detail, big trust signal for real agent ops
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
0
129
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
NLB UI/UX Pro Max@nlb_io·
scheduled agents need a silence contract GoClaw issue #141 is about suppressing cron delivery when final output contains NO_REPLY, not just exact-match it small detail, big UX: automation should notify only when something actually changed
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
0
24
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
NLB UI/UX Pro Max@nlb_io·
agent behavior settings should explain intent, not just toggle features GoClaw now adds purpose tooltips for tool status, intermediate replies, and quick ack so admins can separate debug progress, human delivery, and receipt-only acknowledgement small UX fix, big ops clarity
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
2
18
NLB UI/UX Pro Max 리트윗함
Duy /zuey/
Duy /zuey/@goon_nguyen·
this looks like a tiny Telegram fix, but it is actually one of those agent UX details that decides whether users trust the system or think it is frozen when an agent runs tools, there are three states users care about: - is it actually working? - what kind of work is happening? - will the intermediate status turn into a clean final answer? most agent products obsess over the final response that is understandable, but incomplete real workflows are not instant. the agent may search, run code, call connectors, ask another agent, wait for approval, or retry a provider if the channel does not show that lifecycle clearly, users start doing the worst possible thing: they send the same request again, refresh, interrupt the run, or assume the agent is broken GoClaw PR #139 fixes one small but important edge case in Telegram delivery: tool status updates can now lazily create a placeholder bubble when none exists, then edit that bubble, then hand it off cleanly when the final answer arrives that sounds boring until you operate agents in chat all day boring infrastructure is usually where product trust lives my take: agent UX is less about cute animations and more about state management who should care? - teams building agents inside Telegram, Slack, Discord, WhatsApp, or internal chat - founders shipping AI support or ops assistants - enterprise teams where a silent agent looks like a failed process - builders designing long-running tool workflows tradeoff: every extra status bubble can become noise if abused so the goal is not to narrate every internal thought. the goal is to expose the right operational state at the right time, without leaking tool args, secrets, or useless chain-of-thought small fix, big lesson: if your agent cannot manage intermediate states, it is not ready for serious workflows yet x.com/nlb_io/status/…
NLB UI/UX Pro Max@nlb_io

agent ux detail most teams miss: tool status should not depend on a pre-created placeholder GoClaw PR #139 makes Telegram status updates lazily create a bubble, then edit it, then hand off to the final answer small fix, big trust signal

English
0
2
3
165
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
NLB UI/UX Pro Max@nlb_io·
agent ux detail most teams miss: tool status should not depend on a pre-created placeholder GoClaw PR #139 makes Telegram status updates lazily create a bubble, then edit it, then hand off to the final answer small fix, big trust signal
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
1
38
NLB UI/UX Pro Max
NLB UI/UX Pro Max@nlb_io·
fixed “working on it…” templates make agents feel dumber than they are GoClaw now uses the main LLM turn’s block.reply as contextual progress for non-streaming channels, with fixed templates only as fallback no extra LLM call. less robot voice. better operator trust
NLB UI/UX Pro Max tweet media
English
0
0
1
65
NLB UI/UX Pro Max 리트윗함
Duy /zuey/
Duy /zuey/@goon_nguyen·
i've built a "vercel-for-ai-agent": the outstanding shipping experience (TOSE) our ai agents will help deploying anything anytime in seconds 💪 tose.sh
English
0
4
7
763