고정된 트윗
@wideawake_media What’s most important is to know who to trust with your life and be fearless of those who can only destroy your physical body.
Our hope does not reside on this earth
Know Him
Isaiah 53 and 56
John 1:1-14
English
Procession Out of Deception
12.8K posts
Procession Out of Deception
@outofdeception
Pursuer of Truth | Unabashed Apologist | Refuse to use a letter, this is my TwiX page | Helping Survivors of SRA, MK Ultra, Monarch, CSA & DV get free
가입일 Nisan 2023
198 팔로잉239 팔로워
@malachiobrien @MikeWingerii Your response is utter nonsense
You preached from a plagiarized and fabricated book
A little leaven leavens the whole lump
It’s not even a “translation”
It’s heretical to call it such
Simmons claimed he would be given “secrets”…this is Joseph Smith 2.0
Blasphemy
English
Most pastors don’t consider a Bible translation they use occasionally to be a translation they “preach from.”
Most pastors have a primary translation they use.
For example, have I preached from The Passion Translation? Yes.
Twice.
Do I preach from it? No.
I preach from the New Living Translation (NLT), which is the translation I regularly study, prepare from, and preach from.
Before that, I preached from the NKJV.
English
Bill said he didn’t preach from The Passion Translation. Then he did.
David Fish@DavidFish7
This is a recent clip of Bill Johnson preaching from the Passion Translation and praising the footnotes. The only problem? The footnote of the passage Bill is quoting is plagiarized from p. 599 of a book by Glenn David Bauscher (image below) and the second half is plagiarized from the website of a fringe filmmaker named Victor Alexander. Brian Simmons gets the praise (and financial reward) from the Bethel platform, while the authors whose work he stole do not. The Passion Translation is still sold on the Bethel website and bookstore.
English
@MikeWingerii Liars always lie
Bill constantly says the opposite of what he does
English
@PetGorilla Because Joseph Smith was a 33rd° Freemason & occultist
18th & 19th century American Freemasonry was aryan and hybridized with occultism & theosophy
Mormonism is fabricated on the foundation of mystical Kabbalhaism & Freemasonry
It’s Luciferian occultism
No wonder 👇🏻
English
Hey Mormons,
Why did Jesus want to keep black people out of temples until 1978?
And why are you all too scared to answer the question?
English
Exactly
Just like Freemasons
They will always hide the truth & misinterpret their doctrines (symbols) to the “profane” non-mormons
Mormonism is occult freemasonry repackaged
Rajah Manchou of Vorito@surskitmaxxing
You can’t even get most Mormons to admit that they believe in a “plurality of gods” (who coined that term?? Hmmmm) Mormon apologetics usually just boils down to Mormons representing their beliefs dishonestly They’ve read the Book of Abraham. They’ve seen “the gods” in scripture
English
True
Shepard Abraham@AbrahamShepard
🚨 The Anatomy of a Textual Shell Game: How the 10 Commandments are Structurally Neutralized The version of the 10 Commandments displayed on Catholic church walls, concrete monuments, and parish websites is fundamentally different from what is actually written inside their own official Catechism. This isn’t a simple matter of "ancient numbering history"—it is a structural mechanism of bad-faith concealment and textual overloading. Here is exactly how the layout operates behind closed doors: 1. The Public-Facing Erasure (The Bailey) If you walk into a parish or visit a diocesan website (such as the official page for Sacred Heart Catholic Church or the Vatican's main Section Two headers), you will see a clean, truncated 1–10 list. Under Commandment #1, the explicit biblical prohibition against making and bowing to graven images (Exodus 20:4–5) is 100% missing. It is replaced with a short, positive summary or an entirely different New Testament verse ("You shall worship the Lord your God and Him only shall you serve"). 2. The Internal Text-Overloading (The Motte) When cornered on this blatant deletion, apologists sprint to the master manual, yelling: "We didn't delete it! Look at Subsection IV!" But look at what they physically did to the text structure inside that manual. To protect their physical practice of kneeling before statues, they took the massive "graven image" prohibition block from Exodus and dragged/folded it directly into the First Commandment. They overloaded Commandment #1 with so many extra modifications, explanations, and long-form sentences that it became structurally impossible to fit on a standard public display plaque. Because the list is now a massive wall of text, the public-facing billboards just wipe the restriction completely clean from public view. 3. The "Nevertheless" Addition (The Neutralization Layer) It gets worse. The moment you open the Catechism to find where the image ban was buried, you discover that they didn't just move it—they added text to completely neutralize it. Right after quoting the restriction in Paragraph 2129, the very next sentence in Paragraph 2130 hits the reader with a massive, conditional addition: "𝘕𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴..." The text immediately pivots to listing Old Testament exceptions (like the bronze serpent and the cherubim on the Ark) to explicitly build a loophole for the physical use of religious art. They structurally overwrite a clear, negative biblical restriction ("Thou shalt not bow down to them") by appending an institutional qualification that says, "Actually, yes you can, as long as you label the action 'veneration' instead of 'adoration.'" The Verdict This is a textbook Motte-and-Bailey fallacy wrapped inside a Convinced Deletion. They modify the layout. They overload the first command with so many extra words it can't be displayed on the street. They insert a "Nevertheless" addition to completely gut the original restriction. You cannot claim a law is "active and unchanged" when you scrub it from 99.9% of your public billboards, hide the real text in a fine-print manual that the vast majority of ordinary parishioners never read, and immediately neutralize it with an added footnote the moment it appears. The concrete receipts and the website headers don't lie. The public list is a rewritten system. Total bad faith exposed. ❌🪨
English
Procession Out of Deception 리트윗함
Procession Out of Deception 리트윗함
Hey Jasmine…
Black pilot here.
I think you missed the plot.
Then again, that’s becoming a pattern.
I graduated from West Point.
I went through Army flight school.
I learned to fly the AH-64 Apache.
I deployed to combat and flew 55 combat missions over Baghdad.
Nobody handed me a cockpit because of my skin color.
Nobody lowered the standards for me.
Nobody looked at me and said, “Let’s check a diversity box.”
That’s what people like you don’t seem to understand.
Suggesting that Black pilots, Black engineers, Black doctors, or Black leaders need special preferences to succeed is not empowering, it’s insulting.
I didn’t want a different standard.
I wanted the same standard.
And when you’re flying into combat, the American people don’t care what race the pilot is.
They care whether the pilot is qualified.
Merit isn’t racist.
Excellence isn’t discriminatory.
And reducing every achievement to skin color says far more about your worldview than it does about mine.
English
Procession Out of Deception 리트윗함
This is a recent clip of Bill Johnson preaching from the Passion Translation and praising the footnotes.
The only problem? The footnote of the passage Bill is quoting is plagiarized from p. 599 of a book by Glenn David Bauscher (image below) and the second half is plagiarized from the website of a fringe filmmaker named Victor Alexander.
Brian Simmons gets the praise (and financial reward) from the Bethel platform, while the authors whose work he stole do not.
The Passion Translation is still sold on the Bethel website and bookstore.
English
@Andrewtxatty Now your judging me and claiming I’m not a Christian
English
@outofdeception Pseudo Christians always sling the word “cult” around because it gives them more followers. You don’t know what a cult is. You do not know what masonic rituals are, and you know less about Lds rituals. And you know virtually nothing about the true gospel of Jesus Christ.
English
Mormons believe in proxy baptism
This is against free will
Who else is against free will
Lucifer/Nachash/aka Satan
No wonder he got Smith to teach that he and Jesus are brothers & the Father was a man putting himself on the same level as YHWH
This is Luciferian Freemasonry
English
@Andrewtxatty What commandment is that?
Your arguments are circular
Saying LDS are not christian isn’t pronouncing judgement aka condemning them to eternal damnation. The LORD does that according to His WORD which LDS claim is corrupted & needs to have J Smith restore it which is blasphemy
English
@outofdeception You can’t name a single primary commandment that the Lds people are intentionally breaking. Not one. You are breaking one: God said that he reserves judgment for himself, and yet you are judging others: as non-Christian!
English
@Andrewtxatty Actually I do, but you will continue with your strawman and ad hominem nonsense
English
@outofdeception I’m not sure about the father being a man. But I’m absolutely, positively sure that you have no rational response for Psalms 82:6.
English
@Andrewtxatty Thank you for proving my point
It’s occultism
You are breaking every primary commandment
English
@outofdeception Both the Lds and the Freemasons claim their ceremonies come from the ancient temples. Today’s Christians don’t even have a clue what that means because they have lost the true gospel.
English
Brian Simmons is Joseph Smith 2.0
David Fish@DavidFish7
One of the textbook "smoking guns" of plagiarism is when one work copies a MISTAKE from another work. In Romans 8:9, The Passion Translation plagiarizes Francois du Toit's footnote from the "Mirror Bible." The only problem is the whole thing was already fictitious when du Toit wrote it. The words in Romans 8:9 and Luke 15:17 are completely different, and the proposed "translation" (which matches in both) is nonsense. Brian sees this footnote and decides to sound smart by saying "this is an unusual Greek clause." There's nothing unusual about the clause in Romans 8:9. The construction used in Luke 15:17 is not similar. The entire thing was fabricated by du Toit. Not only does Brian Simmons not know any of the original languages, he plagiarizes other people who ALSO do not know the languages. This footnote is still on @YouVersion as we speak.
English
@Joeray AMEN BROTHER
Fact:
YHWH=εγο εμι=Jesus
Ex 3:4, John 8:58
Deut 6:4
Hear O Israel, the LORD (YHWH) our God, the LORD (YHWH) is one (echad)
Deut 6:13, Matt 4:10
You shall fear (worship) the LORD (YHWH) your God and serve Him only
Ex 20:3
You shall have no other gods before me
English
When you try to "debunk" a religion, you should ask "What did God give me, to know that these claims are false?"
Believe it or not, no where does God tell you to debunk claims by trying to show how those claims are impossible or by recreating them.
You don't have to know how Pharoah's magicians summoned a snake. You don't have to know how heavy the golden plates would have been. You don't have to know that it isn't Mary at Fatima.
All you have to know is the commands of YHWH and that all three of these contain commands that contradict it.
That is all it takes. Don't become a naturalist in the process of pursuing the supernatural. Stick to God. Know his commands. They are a light unto your feet.
Deut 13:4
English
@Andrewtxatty @dttpeople You’re a lawyer?
You don’t seem to understand clear commandments nor proper discourse
English
@outofdeception @dttpeople Lay your butt off, but it doesn’t change the truth. Abraham did not commit adultery. Jacob did not commit adult. And Moses likely did not commit adultery.
English
🧵I feel bad for Issac Hale, the father of Joseph Smith's first wife Emma Smith.
He told Joseph he could not marry his daughter.
Joseph does it anyway.
Then he cheats on her and marries many other women against her will.
What Issac Hale said in the next tweet below is amazing:
English
@Andrewtxatty @dttpeople Yes, he committed adultry
Fully disqualified
What is spoken of in the Hebrew scriptures is not prescriptive but descriptive
Abraham paid a heavy proce for going against the commands of the LORD
So did Jacob, David, Solomon etc.
English
@dttpeople It’s not false to call you a moron is it? My business is to point out liars. Joseph Smith married all of his additional wives with Emma’s acquiescence. That’s not cheating more than Abraham cheated.
English
@QuestionTrinity @darknytPB We are called to judge those who claim to be brothers but practice abominations
Heresy is an abomination
Denying YHWH=Jesus is an abomination
We call out false teachers, false prophets, and false doctrines as instructed by the Word (ie. Eph 5:11)
English
@darknytPB DK. Judge of man’s heart.
Praise God this is not so!
English
Yes, Jesus is called God in the NT. So is Satan.
Yet the NT only calls one person the “one God” and “Almighty”. This person is the Father.
English