just_a_plebian

@guyinhoney @ChristianHeiens There are a lot of districts that look verybstrange or cut through others, 23 states != 50 states. X-Y are variables, use numbers eg. 100K-200K. Maybe congress can pass a law that representatives have to match the registered amount of voters, within 10%. 40% R = 40% of seats

@rationalthink3r @ChristianHeiens Non-contiguous districts are uncommon and already banned in 23 states. Banning it doesn't prevent gerrymandering. Also, districts are by definition roughly equal size in population, so I don't know what you mean by making them between X-Y thousands of citizens.

We are heading towards a future where something like this becomes what a narrow GOP majority in Congress looks like in 10 years.* Extreme geographic polarization on a scale America has not seen in over a century and a half. *Nevermind that the 2030 census will gut multiple Blue states.

@787_10ER @theogdaddy @DelusionPosting @CanadianPolling Yeah just looked as well. Thats wild. We have so many foreign accounts pushing disinformation for processes sacred to our Republic

@rationalthink3r @theogdaddy @DelusionPosting Canada. His other account is @CanadianPolling .

@theogdaddy @DelusionPosting Wait what? Where are they based out of?

@DelusionPosting USA_Polling isn't even american btw.

@AlGeneRobi96834 Thats a really well written explanation. Going to cite this in the future

Had a real conversation today… A man told me: “Black people just lost their ability to vote.” I asked him one question… Why only Black people? Why not Asians… Indians… Germans… Italians? He pivoted… Said the Supreme Court “won’t give Black people special circumstances anymore.” So I asked him plainly… You’re saying Black Americans need permanent federal oversight to vote? Indefinitely? Because without it… what… they can’t participate? He had no answer. Let’s deal in facts… The 15th Amendment already guarantees the right to vote regardless of race. That protection never went away. What changed is this… The Court questioned whether decades-old emergency provisions should continue without current, measurable evidence. That’s a constitutional question… not racial suppression. If your argument is that one group needs a permanent exception to the standard applied to every other American… You better be able to explain why. Because if you can’t… You’re not defending rights. You’re defending dependency. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

@realJeremyCarl Never underestimate the ability of the GOP to f- things up.

@guyinhoney @ChristianHeiens That will make no difference. Beaurocracy for beaurocracy sake. Instead congress should pass a law stating districts must be between X-Y thousands of citizens and contiguous/not broken up by other districts. This enforces basic requirements w/o central authority

@ChristianHeiens Maybe if it gets that bad we'll actually get a national ban on gerrymandering. The best way to do it is probably to require states to set up their own independent redistricting committees, and have the courts settle disputes case-by-case. Centralizing would be bad

@Airaasayss indubitably Without reservation I shant consider otherwise

How would you like to answer my question???

@JackCrabb1776 @Rightanglenews Thats not the point we know that. Its UNCONSTITUTIONAL nature of the concept (overriding votes based on what other people vote) and that she sold herself as a moderate not a far leftist

@Rightanglenews This is somewhat misleading. They joined the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC). Many States have done it but it needs 48 more electoral votes before it would go into effect. Essentially about 4-6 more States.

BREAKING - Outrage is erupting across Virginia after Abigail Spanberger signed HB965 into law, effectively rendering Virginians’ presidential votes null and void, with the measure handing the states electoral votes to the national popular vote winner regardless of states results.

Remember who you're doing it for...

Steak sauce should be a crime.

@MathisPNewton @MarkVoelker1 @LibertyCappy This ^^^

@MarkVoelker1 @LibertyCappy The Federal Reserve is not a Federal Agency.

What are you deleting first?

@AntiLeftMemes Its also the law, its just now being enforced.

Cuando bañas a tu primer hijo VS cuando bañas al segundo.

🎯

@JohnBinder5 @reddit_lies You didnt comprehend what I wrote. Im not trashing you, Im explaining you dont understand the complexity of what you are proposing. Unless you really understand the fundamentals (temperature, k1, knn, rag, vectorization, costs, splitting, diffs to start) you cant solution.

Do you have to build an AI agent? You know they made software for checking plagiarism before AI existed? I remember in college it found I had used some of my own text from an online post in an essay I turned in. Is it really too much to ask them to save the text for a while and check it with some software upon request? Lots of them save it for a while anyway. If that’s still too much for free, maybe they could charge the schools.

Schools are going to have to reinvent how they teach entirely with the advent of LLMs.

@JohnBinder5 @reddit_lies 2/ youd have to build an ai agent to go through all of those outputs using rag, splitting, context diffs, etc etc to find if a majority of text matches. Then explain who is paying for all of this storage and compute when AI companies arent profitable yet

@JohnBinder5 @reddit_lies Lol. Tell me you dont use or write AI without telling me. Agentic processing doesnt happen in one dump, its build piece by piece so you cant "look for a document" it made. It uses KNN usimg a matrix of works that it has consumed. Plagerism and output by ai can be very close

🇺🇸😎

@JustSumKlTTEN @thechosenberg Do you realize that, in fact, it is not? Colds kill people every year. You cant hide away in a bubble.

@thechosenberg You all realize COVID is still going on and disabling people?

All that sacrifice just to keep the COVID era mask on

@MrAbviews 14