Robert Andrews

33.3K posts

Robert Andrews

Robert Andrews

@reason_itself

True Londoner, born and bred!

London 가입일 Mart 2011
0 팔로잉441 팔로워
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
Neal Asher
Neal Asher@nealasher·
Solar panels, wind turbines, massively expanded energy infrastructure, payments for not producing energy, and the required equivalent fossil fuel backup are not free. Why do you think our energy in the UK is the most expensive in the world? Did you learn economics from the Social Worker, you absolute tit?
evil doggo@Nitulof1995

@nealasher Expensive energy?? It's cus we keep digging out fossil fuels. The sun is free, you absolute tit.

English
5
7
33
749
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
Jamais Vu 🏉
Jamais Vu 🏉@boot15_vu·
This week in the UK: A “man” will rape multiple British women A “man” will break into the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 A “man” will stab several people in the UK A “man” will steal thousands of phones A “man” will break into someone’s home And a beta man in 10 Downing Street will do fuck all about it.
English
9
126
468
5.3K
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
Voice of Reason
Voice of Reason@brexitblog_info·
Why does the BBC always think it appropriate to invite a left-leaning actor ( in this case Eddie Marsan) onto a current affairs show to spout ritual criticism of Trump & plug Labour & Starmer? I couldn’t give a rats arse for Marsan’s views on anything. Stick to acting.
Voice of Reason tweet media
English
743
466
4.2K
56.9K
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
Right over Left Everytime
Right over Left Everytime@RightSide_Uk·
The phone was wiped because of the government software on that allows this for security reasons, the same software that religiously backs up the phone every day to the SAME government system. WHERE IS THE BACKUP?
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677

Downing Street Wiped the Phone Before Anyone Could Find It Scotland Yard has reopened its investigation into the reported theft of Morgan McSweeney's phone, the device that almost certainly contained the most direct evidence of how Lord Mandelson came to be appointed as Britain's ambassador to Washington. Detectives are examining CCTV footage from the Westminster street where McSweeney claims he was robbed on the evening of October 20 last year. They fear the footage will already have been deleted. It is usually stored for only three months. The investigation, in other words, has been reopened into evidence that may no longer exist. On the evening of October 20, McSweeney called 999 from Pimlico. He gave the wrong address. He did not correct the handler when the wrong address was read back to him. He did not identify himself as the Prime Minister's chief of staff. He did not mention that the device contained sensitive government material. The following day, a police officer called to ask whether McSweeney had tracked the phone using its built-in tracker. He did not respond. At some point between the reported theft and that unanswered call, Downing Street remotely wiped the device. This destroyed the tracker. The phone could no longer be located. The messages it contained could no longer be recovered. Now consider what did not happen. The Metropolitan Police were not informed that the missing device belonged to the Prime Minister's chief of staff. MI5 was not informed. GCHQ was not informed. The Information Commissioner's Office, which must by law be notified within 72 hours of any serious data breach involving personal information, was not informed. It told The Telegraph this week that it had received no notification at any stage. Set this against what was happening inside Downing Street at the same moment. Officials had been holding meetings to discuss what they would do if the Conservatives used parliamentary process to force the disclosure of McSweeney's messages with Lord Mandelson. The phrase used in those meetings, according to reports, was coming for Morgan's messages. Days after those meetings concluded, the phone containing Morgan's messages was reported stolen. Days after that, it was wiped. A prosecutorial mind, presented with this sequence, asks one question above all others. At the point when Downing Street chose to wipe the device, did anyone consider that doing so would destroy the tracker and make recovery impossible? The answer is yes. That is what remote wiping does. It is not a passive consequence. It is the purpose. There are innocent explanations available for most of what surrounds this affair. Wrong addresses happen. Unanswered calls happen. Notification failures happen. But the decision to wipe a missing government device, knowing that doing so would render it untraceable and its contents unrecoverable, at the precise moment when those contents were the subject of active parliamentary and legal scrutiny, is not a clerical error. It is a choice. And choices have authors. Keir Starmer has said he beats himself up over the Mandelson appointment. He has not said who authorised the wipe. He has not explained why the ICO was not notified. He has not said whether anyone in Downing Street attempted to track the device before wiping it. He has not explained why MI5 and GCHQ, the agencies whose job it is to manage exactly this kind of security risk, were kept in the dark. These are not difficult questions. They have simple, factual answers. A government with nothing to hide would have provided them already. The country is still waiting. "Keir Starmer has said he beats himself up over the Mandelson appointment. [...]. He has not explained why MI5 and GCHQ, the agencies whose job it is to manage exactly this kind of security risk, were kept in the dark."

English
1
89
221
3.6K
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
Peter B
Peter B@realpeteyb123·
USA is finished Radical judges rule over us. 19yo thug shoves 84yo grandpa from behind, cracks his skull on the pavement, kills him… then cries ‘bad day’ and walks free on probation. Not sure what we doing anymore.. No hope.
Peter B tweet media
English
867
5.9K
24K
478.7K
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
John Redwood
John Redwood@johnredwood·
Greens write to my website saying more North Sea UK gas will not lower prices so is not worth doing. They should know that home gas down a pipe causes so much less CO 2 than imported LNG. Contract gas by pipe will be cheaper than current high import prices for LNG.
English
53
110
546
7.4K
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
The Met are now “trawling CCTV” where Morgan McSweeney says his government phone was stolen – just to “establish the facts.” They got the address wrong. Checked the wrong cameras. Closed the case without speaking to him. Only woke up once Parliament wanted his Mandelson messages. When the police have to retro-fit the facts around Downing Street’s narrative, that’s not policing. That’s a cover-up.
English
9
153
551
8.8K
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
Eyal Yakoby
Eyal Yakoby@EYakoby·
Nearly the entire Muslim world has expelled representatives of the Islamic Republic in Iran. Meanwhile, Spain and the UK embrace the regime. Weird.
English
113
360
3K
23.7K
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
ArganautX
ArganautX@ArganautX·
@williamnhutton You're not helping matters because on the same day it generated less than 10%.
English
0
1
1
19
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
mark harris 🇬🇧🇪🇺🇨🇿
@williamnhutton Why is this framed as a left right issue? Common sense dictates we can continue to accelerate renewabales at the same time as utilising our oil and gas in the North sea rather than importing this from Qatar. Unless you have some sort of ideology which leads to peverse decisions
English
0
1
3
105
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
reg morris
reg morris@gold123win·
@williamnhutton @DeborahMeaden ⭐️The Facts it’s costing us £Billions following NetZero Policy now when completed only 30% to 40% of our EnergyNeeds We should have gone 100% Nuclear like France for our EnergyNeeds By stopping FossilFuels was a huge mistake & going 100% Net Zero a loser to our Economy @marionste
English
1
2
5
587
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
Flaps OHoolahan
Flaps OHoolahan@FlapsO_Hoolahan·
@williamnhutton @Deformscum This is bullshit Over 50% from renewables almost daily Paid by the fuel industry are you? Dogger Bank will supply 30% of our entire energy needs. The new one announced off the north east will add another 6gw of energy that never goes up in price and doesn’t get stuck in wars
Flaps OHoolahan tweet media
English
13
3
24
3.4K
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
JamesFennell MBE
JamesFennell MBE@FennellJW·
@williamnhutton Still stupid not to drill our own gas, the carbon footprint of imported gas is much greater and all we do by not pumping our own is force other countries like Norway to pump more to meet our demand.
English
6
8
114
3.9K
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
Gino
Gino@QeenKGino·
There's nothing 'Clean & affordable' about it you liar Ed's a liar who will not listen to the people he is supposed to work for. Deindustrialising Britain to outsource our energy security to China then claiming to be environmentalists & green is a joke Mass unemployment Expensive bills No energy security the list is endless .. it isn't a right or left issue it's a serious lack common bloody sense & ideology !
English
5
8
194
4K
Robert Andrews 리트윗함
Raja Miah
Raja Miah@recusant_raja·
The offence of misconduct in public office is a common law offence carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. It is committed when a public officer, acting in the course of their duties, wilfully neglects those duties or wilfully misconducts themselves to a degree that amounts to an abuse of the public’s trust, and does so without reasonable excuse. So why has Dame Antonia Romeo not been charged with Misconduct in Public Office? She was permanent secretary at the Home Office when she appeared before the Home Affairs Select Committee in December. Her duty was candour. Parliament was examining whether the evidence base for the most significant child sexual abuse inquiry in British history had been protected. She told the committee the department expected records to be preserved. She did not tell them that no formal instruction had gone to police forces. She did not tell them that Bradford and other areas had received nothing. She knew, or the means to know were available to her, that Casey’s requirement had not been met for six months. The CPS guidance is clear that wilful misconduct includes reckless indifference as to whether conduct is wrong. Mere negligence does not suffice. What Romeo did was not negligent. It was a senior official telling a parliamentary committee what they wanted to hear rather than what they needed to know. That is an abuse of the public’s trust in the office she held. She is now the cabinet secretary. The most powerful civil servant in the country. The question of whether any MP dares refer Dame Antonia Romeo for investigation, let alone report her to the police answers itself. This is just another example of how powerful these people are and how deep the Pakistani Rape Gang cover up runs. This is why it is up to us s to lead this fight. ————- I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town helped force the national inquiry. You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. If you can afford to do so, supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year). Sign up here; 👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk If you can’t commit to a regular subscription, a one-off contribution genuinely helps keep this alive. You can support me using one of these links; 👉 BuyMeACoffee.com/recusantnine 👉 paypal.me/RecusantNine We’re up against a machine, politicians, police, officials, and media, working together to shrink, sanitise, and bury the truth. This work survives because of you. If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. I need your help. Raja 🙏
Raja Miah tweet media
English
21
504
1K
13.2K