angel

956 posts

angel banner
angel

angel

@search4hyde

schizoposting mostly ‧⋆ really a sweet boy 18+

가입일 Şubat 2026
26 팔로잉22 팔로워
angel
angel@search4hyde·
I WHIP MY MEN INTO SHAPE!!!
English
0
0
0
3
angel 리트윗함
хихик🧚‍♀️
хихик🧚‍♀️@chenchikkk·
Хаскердасты полюбили друг друга такими, какие они есть Энджел не просит Хаска бросить столько пить, стать более милым, убрав грубость Хаск принимает Энджела с его травмами, не испытывает отвращение из-за работы, не называет шлюхой они любят друг друга настоящими, без всяких «но»
хихик🧚‍♀️ tweet mediaхихик🧚‍♀️ tweet media
Русский
0
16
191
1.7K
angel 리트윗함
turbomander
turbomander@turbomander·
*says something so embarrassing that i curl up and begin to molt* *gesturing at my discarded exoskeleton* was that guy bothering you
English
25
4.5K
27.7K
265.2K
angel 리트윗함
.
.@KnightN59867783·
@josiahhughes @AppleSupport white people be like im flirting with my grandpa
English
2
22
918
39.3K
angel 리트윗함
•ᴗ-
•ᴗ-@evadentz·
we should ban teenagers from ALL media. and then on their 16th birthday they are brought to a theatre to be shown a movie of a train coming directly at them to see if they react and flee in horror like they did in 1896
English
88
7.9K
138.2K
1.2M
‧˚ʚ lea ɞ˚‧
‧˚ʚ lea ɞ˚‧@lae_ealll·
i'm halfway through i HATE THISSS why did i think it it was a good idea to pack 200g of green peas for lunch omfg i'm so stupid
‧˚ʚ lea ɞ˚‧ tweet media
English
253
118
8.9K
350.6K
char
char@voxvangogh·
@RetroBettyO alastor is the entire world’s oc at this point. a different version of him lives in each and every one of us. wow ❤️
English
5
6
107
1.2K
bettyyyyy 𓏲๋࣭࣪˖🔮
i find it interesting that alastor is canonically just a faker and we have no knowledge of his true self and yet HE'S the one the fandom decides to be the most strict about?? "he can't be this he can't like that" bro we don't know this man at all he literally can be anything😭
bettyyyyy 𓏲๋࣭࣪˖🔮 tweet media
English
18
152
1.3K
14.6K
angel
angel@search4hyde·
@igsekai depends on when it issss
English
1
0
1
27
vıxen (🏳️‍🌈 ver.)
How many of ya’ll will watch an art stream? (Just wanna know. For no particular reason at all :b)
English
1
0
3
335
angel 리트윗함
Darren of Plymouth
Darren of Plymouth@DarrenPlymouth·
Mass non-compliance is the only way to end this. Pass it on.
English
52
556
2.3K
18K
angel 리트윗함
Rei 🇳🇴
Rei 🇳🇴@reikodev·
Age verification doesn't protect kids, it's being pushed for mass surveillance.
English
10
521
4.1K
26.3K
angel 리트윗함
Fiona Rose Diamond
Fiona Rose Diamond@CoviLeaks·
Look closely at what the government is promising you here (published 15th June). They claim that if your account is over 16 years old, you are safe from the dragnet. But then comes the casual, insidious trap: if you do have to prove your age, they say it will be 'as simple as a facial recognition check.' Do not let that soft language fool you. 'As simple as a face scan' means surrendering the unchangeable, mathematical architecture of your human identity. Here is the brutal reality: this is a biometric harvesting operation masquerading as child safety. Your biometrics - your face, your irises, your unique biological signature - are the most sensitive pieces of data you possess. If a password leaks, you reset it. If your biometric blueprint is hacked, leaked, or scraped into a government database, your identity is compromised for life. They are normalising the idea that you must scan your body just to access the public square. It is the ultimate blueprint for a permanent digital cage. Once your biological data is stored in their centralised databases (which it will be) your privacy is dead forever. You aren't just logging into an app - you are voluntarily handing over the keys to a corporate and state surveillance engine. An app-level 'under 16s ban' is universally recognised by security experts as unpoliciable and structurally broken. Following the mass backlash from tech companies, the UK government reconsidered its stance... But this is what they're not telling you - something we have warned you about for years. The UK Gov already appointed an expert panel to 'fast-track' a national, official Digital ID scheme earlier this year, that will (despite their current lies) eventually serve as the master credential to 'solve the problem' with an unenforceable 'under 16s social media ban.' It has NEVER been about Children's safety. Ever. So, to coerce compliance of all UK adults, we will soon see the beginning of another textbook manufactured crisis. Do not be fooled by the ongoing political theatre. The predictable failure of this ban is completely by design. As the system intentionally glitches, the media will flood the headlines with weaponised fear - amplifying stories of online horror and grooming to rile up panicked parents. Once again, they are engineering a crisis of fear so severe that the public will ultimately beg for the exact Digital ID grid they would have otherwise rejected. Cast your mind back to September 2025: 'mass illegal migration' didn't work as an excuse for Digital ID, did it? So the Epstein Class now use Children's safety as the excuse. By wrapping the digital credential inside the emotionally charged issue of child safety, dissent is effectively silenced. Anyone arguing against the tracking framework is politically painted as being against child protection. gov.uk/government/pub…
Fiona Rose Diamond tweet media
English
85
833
1.5K
40.8K
angel 리트윗함
Silkie Carlo
Silkie Carlo@silkiecarlo·
Don’t take it from me. Take it from one of the internet’s greatest pioneers @jimmy_wales
Silkie Carlo tweet media
English
33
1.2K
3.2K
66.1K