stu lea

2K posts

stu lea

stu lea

@stulea48

가입일 Şubat 2011
400 팔로잉204 팔로워
😜 Danny Demi DeFi 😜
😜 Danny Demi DeFi 😜@danny_demi_defi·
Should community pool funds go to bribe a D-List celebrity to shill our lovely lady $LUNC and we can just crank out memes around them ?!? Axing for a frendo… 😜🫠🔫
English
4
2
9
476
stu lea 리트윗함
Mr. Diamondhandz1💎
Mr. Diamondhandz1💎@MrDiamondhandz1·
Look at the FACTS! 👇🏻 $BNB is the #4 ranked crypto in the world valued at 103 BILLION. It’s the native coin of #Binance which is the #1 crypto exchange on the planet with 195 MILLION users, and 11 MILLION followers on X. They have a marketing agreement with Cristiano Ronaldo, who has 631 MILLION followers on Instagram, 111 MILLION followers on X, while doing billions of dollars in 24 volume. After all that you think they burn $LUNC MONTHLY for marketing? Don’t miss your chance with #LunaClassic! 💎🤲🏻 #Crypto #LUNC
Mr. Diamondhandz1💎 tweet media
English
44
38
155
11.5K
stu lea 리트윗함
Mr. Diamondhandz1💎
Mr. Diamondhandz1💎@MrDiamondhandz1·
Now that we have our guilty answer on Do Kwon EVERYONE is welcome back at $LUNC. Every builder, every protocol, every supporter, we welcome all of you. We have #Binance burning us monthly, and great teams here. Let’s take #LunaClassic to the moon! 🚀🌕💎🤲🏻 #Crypto #LUNC
Mr. Diamondhandz1💎 tweet media
English
67
155
475
20.7K
stu lea 리트윗함
Classic Crypto | Community First | CARNAC Trading
For #LUNA folks, if the ship does go down, #LUNC will gladly welcome you home. We've got the community, you have the devs. Free yourself from the legal challenges with Luna 2 and come to LUNC and help us build! Let's kill that supply together and you'll see 1000x gains 🔥🤝🙏
English
19
69
236
8.7K
Igor veras
Igor veras@igorsoares62·
I've read the entire KYC proposal, and it's truly not worth working as a volunteer anymore. I don't charge anything, yet I have to spend $100 for registration. Thank you all for your attention, but my mission ends here. #lunc
English
47
10
55
14.1K
Nicolas Boulay
Nicolas Boulay@NicolasBoulay·
Question @luncconquers KYC should only be for L1 devs asking for $ maybe we should clear that up in proposal
English
6
1
9
1.2K
stu lea
stu lea@stulea48·
@Douglas19671983 You won't be able to control it, you don't know hardly any of the current ones ? It would be good if you could
English
0
0
0
17
DST
DST@Douglas19671983·
Do "YOU" Agree That A Proposal Should Be Put Forward To Limit Any Individual or Group from Owning more than ONE Validator?
English
6
3
6
2.1K
stu lea
stu lea@stulea48·
@Thefrgcoin terra14t35sq909x2khre3tgq00ay45sfg0n58v6vg8a
stu lea tweet media
Français
0
0
1
25
FRG Universe Validator
FRG Universe Validator@Thefrgcoin·
💰Pay day💰 who wants free 🤑. Like and retweet.. Drop your wallet address. We will pick a random wallet for 500 FRG.. 1000 FRG if you hold a nft post it with your wallet address please. Spin the wheel 🛞 48 Hrs 🕓 #LUNCcommunity #LuncBurn #LUNCARMY #lunc #LunaClassic #TerraClassic #NFTCommunity #CryptoCommunity #NFTGiveaway #NFTGame ☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️ Buy game Nfts below 👇 miata.io/creators/42/co…
English
25
15
40
3.5K
stu lea
stu lea@stulea48·
@LunaClassicDAO @luncetas @Genuine__Labs The pay per job system isn't up and running yet, in my opinion they need to work on that before anymore jobs get put up for proposal, it's going to cause trouble if they don't
English
0
0
1
31
⚡️CLASSIC DAO⚡️
⚡️CLASSIC DAO⚡️@LunaClassicDAO·
#LUNCcommunity 👀 it seems they can work for half the price and faster upgrading to SDK 0.47! Competition is always healthy for the ecosystem 🙏 Thanks @Genuine__Labs for your support on the development of this chain it proves you are not in for the money but for the development of this chain. Can’t wait to see it on Commonwealth 🔥 #LUNC #LunaClassic #LuncArmy #LuncBurn #LUNCLIVENEWS #LunaClassicNetwork #GarudaUniverse #Binance #OKX
English
4
10
54
4.4K
stu lea
stu lea@stulea48·
@NeonRabbi @ColeStrathclyde @MarktMatts My opinion is we need to wait for new money to come in and stake, big money is set in their ways as far as validators go .. or obviously a massive price increase to get then to undelegate lol
English
0
0
0
20
StrathCole
StrathCole@ColeStrathclyde·
Hey, #LUNCcommunity. As we have reached Q1 of 2024, we've been presented different groups' proposals and/or plans for the next weeks and months in #TerraClassic. I have been asked about the Moon Rabbit Vision document and read it carefully to get an impression of what's contained (and what is not). I'll give my personal opinion here about the paper, but also the published team information. Verify it yourself, don't only trust my words, #dyor. First of all, while the group has criticized the #L1TF or others for presumably trying to centralize things, this roadmap is even worse in that regard. It aims to take control of all aspects of the chain. Funding, L1 development, (official) website and L2, marketing and others. Even a LA DAO is on the table to act as central point of contact for contractors. This is not the preached decentralization, it's centralization in a different guise. Second, while demanding transparency and accountability from others, the whole team refuses to do the exact same thing. Most core members I am aware of refused to speak in AMAs/Spaces. This does not (I repeat, NOT) refer to doxxing at all. It is not necessary to doxx to any community members nor to provide any personal information to L1 or other community members. Third, a private and undisclosed funding source for the free work provided is mentioned. This, imho, creates a risk of conflict of interest between that private source (be it an individual or a company) and the community/chain. Given the lack of accountability and the anonymity of the entire team, one could suspect whether the team is then working for the $LUNC chain or for the investor. Fourth, the team preaches unity, cooperation and inclusion. They also complain about not respecting governance. At the same time, they insist on using their old Commonwealth for discussion instead of the governance-approved Community Forum. Even with copying proposals from the Community Forum with changed headline (yes, the misleading headline is still there for the L1 proposal at the time of this writing). While one could argue that their vision paper is not a proposal discussion, it directly affects the chain and governance. Fifth, the proposed work areas affect critical core components of the system. No member of the team is willing to show a track record of development (e.g. github history). So how does that give any confidence to let them work on core parts of the system to build that initial track record? Sixth, members of the team, even if some are only vocal supporters or non-core members, still show unprofessional ways of communicating and behaving on social media. Seventh, the group is asking for the responsibility of code review/auditing to be fully shifted to individuals or entities from the validator set and the community, further reducing their already non-existent accountability. There is a further point to consider. Their roadmap/plan is formed around the initial free (privately funded) development of upgrading the chain to SDK 0.47. While a SDK update is something we need for #LUNC during the next time, SDK 0.46 (while end-of-life) still receives security patches (see github.com/cosmos/cosmos-…), while cosmwasm 1.1 which we are using is highly outdated (1.2 just reached end of life with no further security updates, see github.com/CosmWasm/advis…). Regarding security this seems like a more pressing thing and isn't even mentioned in the roadmap. This applies for other things, too. Side-note: Some good amounts of text-parts of the paper seem 100% AI-generated. While it's legit to use support from GPT and others, it's a bit odd to have that many fully generated pages in a paper like this. You should make your own mind about if it's truly AI, but the wording (e.g. pages 31, 32 and many following, some parts of introduction and intermediate texts) is very GPT. That's it with my personal opinion on this one. Cheers.
English
30
70
187
39.1K