uncle_ Mo

I just realised that I can’t do this life thing without Morena Jeso

Then they say she didn’t benefit

When it suddenly hits you that, even though you’re a sinner and undeserving, Christ still chose to die for you.

I’ll never forget how the next day after her death was announced we had assembly at school. Usually we had announcement including a moment of silence for those who have passed. My HS had a moment of silence for a whale that died after eating plastic. Mama Winnie didn’t, not even after the black girls tried to say something.

One of the Christian theories we need to get rid off is Jesus Christ being portrait as a white man.

Why do females think not knowing how to cook is cute? “ I only know how to boil eggs”, bathong o stlaela .

Thank you for the compliment 🙏🏽

@baddaysareover “What did she benefit from a 2020 contract,” you are using emotions instead of being rational, so have a great Easter holidays and may God grant you a functional brain sooner❤️

@uncleMo926 What a stupid take. His full names were posted by the SIU. If you were serious about wanting accountability from anyone you’d search the name & find his accounts. What did she benefit from a 2020 contract, before she was even involved with him? Just dumb.

Okay please give us the handle of the man so we can attack him. We only have his wife here on twitter that’s why we are “attacking” her. She benefited

She's gone! 👋

Have you ever seen a tweet that doesn't even concern you, but you immediately go to that person's profile and block them because you don’t want to see any more of their thoughts on your timeline ever again?

Mhlekazi 😹😹😹😭

@Nicole_Barlow1 You are a disgusting racist mokgekolo

From interdict to arrest - a case study in judicial overreach. Let me begin by noting that my experience with the South African courts has, overall, been positive. Over the years, I have been involved in several matters, both as applicant and as respondent, and the outcomes have generally been favourable. This, I believe, is not merely coincidental. Where I have initiated proceedings, I have done so with careful consideration of the merits, and where I have defended matters, I have ensured that I was supported by capable legal representation, the aforementioned, combined with enlightened Judges, secured my fortunes. I have also, despite ultimately prevailing, been subjected to what I regard as malicious and vexatious litigation, by parties who appear to believe that financial strength entitles them to exert pressure on those in a comparatively weaker position. A clear example in my own experience is @bp_SouthAfrica’s proxy, Petro-Props, which instituted proceedings against me on three separate occasions, succeeding only once thanks to that pusillanimous Judge Claassens. That interim judgement, however, later proved consequential in ways that extended beyond the immediate dispute. Experiences such as these have made me particularly alert to the risks posed by flawed judicial decisions and underscore the importance of subjecting such rulings to scrutiny, whether through review or rescission, where appropriate. Courts are not infallible, and though a strong legal system exists precisely because decisions can be revisited, corrected, or overturned, there are times when judicial errors result in such serious consequences that they damage the credibility of the institution itself. The danger is not just in being wrong, but in being wrong in a way that causes immediate and disproportionate harm before corrective measures can intervene. In the case involving Tumi Sole vs Bafana Surprise Mathebula, granting an urgent interdict for defamation - despite the apparent removal of the offending material - raises significant questions about judicial scrutiny and procedural rigour. Urgency, by its nature, requires clear and ongoing harm; invoking it when the alleged harm had arguably already ceased suggests a troubling lowering of that standard. Even more concerning is what happened afterwards: before the respondent had been given the full opportunity, as required by the Uniform Rules of Court, to challenge or respond to the order, the applicant escalated the matter into an urgent contempt application and a warrant of arrest. Such procedural haste risks turning the courts from arbiters of justice into tools of coercion. When legal processes are used in this way, it not only undermines fairness between parties but also damages public confidence, reinforcing the perception that the system can be exploited to devastating effect.

Bafana Mathebula and handlers, like all of them, don't have a brain of their own.🤷🏿‍♂️

@Patricia_Bantom Mam you live for insulting people and spreading misinformation about them. Let me do the honors and block you before I forget.

@uncleMo926 Im blocking people who insult me. If you can still comment on my post, it means you are not under an evil spell that forces you to insult people who have never done anything wrong to you.

The starving ones are the ones who are starving to insult. The ones who have an urge to defend their cult leader everywhere he is mentioned. Im blocking them anyway.

As a responsible adult it’s your duty to research about the person you are dating before marrying them. So all these times she couldn’t just google what type of businesses is her boyfriend involved in before agreeing to marry him. Try to think before tweeting Marcia

I would not mind corruption &200 million houses if the job was done first then looting later.My teacher used to say when u r done ur work...

We are people of 7 Cardinal pillars and superior logic. Not social media hype and feelings❣️ #RegisterToVoteEFF registertovoteeff.org.za

Dankie @EFFSouthAfrica

The agenda is clear is to attack anything which was not part of the Moonshot Pact.