nihl

72 posts

nihl banner
nihl

nihl

@voidnihl

가입일 Kasım 2020
213 팔로잉35 팔로워
nihl
nihl@voidnihl·
@tropicalstuck Unrelated to the post in all ways but word association but.. You ever listened to the band, Tropical Fuck Storm?
English
1
0
1
29
tropicalstuck
tropicalstuck@tropicalstuck·
what tropicalstuck actually means
tropicalstuck tweet media
English
4
1
11
492
nihl
nihl@voidnihl·
The further forward in time that we move, the more hilarious the claim "Kamala would've been as bad/worse" becomes. 2024 may have committed a lot of you to a very real, destructive, long lasting, and generation degrading consequence for your negligence.
English
0
0
0
8
nihl
nihl@voidnihl·
@PangburnEvents Brother.... you've had the answer to this inside you all along lmao
English
0
0
0
52
Pangburn
Pangburn@PangburnEvents·
If Trump drops a nuke in Iran, would that be enough?...
English
4
0
6
791
nihl
nihl@voidnihl·
@DebatingDavid Do you think the govt is just some autonomous machine operating with no input? (Maybe don't answer that) Do you think a breach of national security could endanger citizens regardless of the outcome of this particular incident? Ok so we're even in each other's books I guess..
English
0
0
0
26
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
You said the government said it was bad and hurt. That’s what you’ve offered. And I don’t doubt it was bad for and hurt the govt.. not sure how the taxpayers were endangered by Snowden.. Can I demonstrate how exposing the greatest spying apparatus to ever be used against the American people was a benefit to anyone..?? I guess not.. lol I guess exposing Epstein prolly a net negative by that same measure too then huh? Can’t endanger national security.. AM I RIGHT
English
1
0
0
8
nihl
nihl@voidnihl·
@DebatingDavid I gave examples of how it hurt it. There's reporting on all of this if you don't believe me. Can you demonstrate how it benefited anyone or anything?
English
1
0
0
24
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
@voidnihl But you can’t demonstrate how it hurt it, which is what I’m asking, you can only assert it.. which is good since all this will be deleted anyways.
English
1
0
0
6
nihl
nihl@voidnihl·
@DebatingDavid @JohnKiriakou You do a lot of ruminative bloviating for someone with "debate" in their name, but I suppose that is what the masses consider it to be now. I've seen this guy floating around recently but I haven't looked into it yet so I'll refrain from speculating until I have. Thanks though
English
1
0
0
17
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
@JohnKiriakou Come get the traitor @voidnihl lol I know you think Russiagate was real, Covid vaccines stopped transmission, and that Ed Snowden actually exposed nothing we didn’t already know and only endangered our assets.. so I thought you’d take a stab at this one too lmao 🤣
English
1
0
0
240
John Kiriakou
John Kiriakou@JohnKiriakou·
I sat down with Tucker Carlson to talk about something most people in Washington would rather you never hear about. I blew the whistle on the CIA’s torture program—and I was the only one who went to prison for it. Not the people who authorized it. Not the people who designed it. Not the people who carried it out. Me. We talked about what really happened after 9/11, how the intelligence community changed, and why I believe the truth still matters—no matter the cost. This isn’t politics. It’s accountability. rumble.com/v77ahtk-john-k…
English
42
623
3.3K
62.6K
nihl
nihl@voidnihl·
@DebatingDavid Are you being purposefully obtuse or can you not connect any of that to moral harm? I'm saying that the thing he's celebrated for revealing had already been known as early as 2005. The other 99% was not related to that thing and actively harmed the country
English
1
0
0
15
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
So what’s the moral objection exactly since the who is unknown and the what is all govt operations that could potential be linked to tyranny and/or expansionism? And whatever moral objection you potentially explain (prolly won’t) how is that a net negative to the net positive of what it exposed.. oh yeah that’s right.. he exposed nothing in your world lmao 🤣
English
1
0
0
18
nihl
nihl@voidnihl·
@DebatingDavid I agree. It's not. *Who" specifically has not been disclosed for obvious reasons. "What" is: NSA's TAO tactics, operations by the army, Navy, Marine, and Air Force. It forced the UKs MI6 to relocate spies due to location compromise. It was a huge breach of national security
English
1
0
0
25
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
Not a hard sentence to digest dude. Get specific. Who and what specifically was endangered so I know how this applies morally. Sounds like a legal argument.. Don’t tell me he exposed black file CIA paramilitary were somewhere they shouldn’t be or specifically where we said we didn’t have boots on the ground and “eNdaNgErEd ThEM” lol
English
1
0
0
10
nihl
nihl@voidnihl·
@DebatingDavid You said "I could if..." Implying that you couldn't unless certain conditions were met. No matter... Sure. What he revealed to the public was mostly already known. That's 1% of what he stole though. He endangered us assets and revealed many other govt secrets to Russia and China
English
1
0
0
48
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
I just said I could.. Jesus you really are difficult to converse with. I just said any argument made would be a legal one but would ignore the fact of the reality what he did was expose our government for wrong doing. It doesn’t matter.. leave the legal argument out. That’s an argument that won’t be taken seriously. All ears on your moral argument how exposing what he did was wrong… can’t wait. I WILL use this along with your takes on Covid and Russiagate.. most likely. There’s more than a 0% chance you actually say something insightful and interesting. Let’s see.
English
1
0
0
4
nihl
nihl@voidnihl·
@DebatingDavid So to be clear, you do not understand the argument for why what he did could be considered treasonous, or at least not enough to steelman it? It'd be remiss to exclude the legal argument because it does matter, but I could make a moral argument as well
English
1
0
0
7
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
I could if I was a govt stooge. Could you explain how what he did was a net negative not a net positive regardless of whatever bull shit *legality* you’d try to reference as to how what he did is treasonous? Only arguments you could make are legal and thats retarded because if you haven’t noticed yet.. there’s a two tiered justice system.
English
1
0
0
4