Wuiv

@vivibelowstars @kirawontmiss But hypothetically if they did have to then I'd be quite a good fit for the job

@wuivot @kirawontmiss nobody has to do any of that

men fear one thing….

@vivibelowstars @kirawontmiss SOMEONE HAS TO PUT THEIR DICK IN THE BABIES MOUTH WHY ARE YOU CALLING ME OUT FOR STEPPING UP

@wuivot @kirawontmiss dawg

@vivibelowstars @kirawontmiss It's small and doesn't get hard anymore so it would be good for the job if someone had to do it

@vivibelowstars @kirawontmiss No cause like

@vivibelowstars @kirawontmiss I would be so good at that icl

@kirawontmiss what do men fear? is it breastfeeding babies with their cocks?

@looominescent @guacamoulay @yvessirae I've seen it one too many times and that's what the definition implies

@wuivot @guacamoulay @yvessirae Who had ever implied that a 17 yo dating an 18-year-old is grooming and rape??? 😭 literally no one.

The fact that it's always exactly 18 years old and NEVER 19 or 20 clearly shows they would go even lower if the law and ‘morality’ didn’t hold them back.

@WinterLeast @furmerly I'm already on laser and ipl so I'll just continue them but I'm envious you can do this

@wuivot @furmerly My hair doesn’t grow back fast enough or thick enough for my hair to be patchy or anything at all either, especially after epilating. It grows back way way thinner. Any hairs that grow back are almost invisible to the eye.

i forgot again, is electrolysis or laser the better option guys

@amverynorm46621 @furmerly Your hair grows back because it grows in cycles and laser isn't 100% effective like electrolysis

@wuivot @furmerly idk, no surgeon i talked to allows laser in preparation for srs specifically because of the hair growing back

@daisei4444 @guacamoulay @yvessirae No I'm a pedo hebe and ephebophile but that's besides the point. The colloquial definition of "anyone under 18" is based on nothing, utterly worthless and contradicts with an existing term

@wuivot @guacamoulay @yvessirae dude idgaf if they aren’t “technically prepubescent” they’re still underage, are you also “technically” an epebophile and not a pedophile ??

@xstaffsuck @furmerly Laser is permanent ipl isn't, it's just not as efficient at it as electrolysis

@furmerly Laser isnt permanent, electrolysis is The former is cheaper & faster, the latter takes longer & more expensive.

@ExpandDong42069 @furmerly Paradoxidcal reactions are pretty rare

@furmerly Electro is better, laser has thr potential to make hair thicker and darker

@WinterLeast @furmerly I don't get how you people do it. I tried and it was completely unbearable with otc painmeds and scarred me while breaking more hairs than actually pulling roots.

@furmerly I’d rather just epilate myself at home. It’s not permanent but even after only a few months of doing it my hairs grow back like nothing and they’re not painful at all to remove. The first time was HELL Though. I definitely still recommend epilating tho :P

@_aria1_ @furmerly Both destroy the follicle, laser is just dependant on the hair's ability to absorb the energy and burn. Alexandrite and (maybe) ruby are more effective for lighter hairs than other higher wavelength lasers.

@furmerly electrolysis physically destroys the follicle, guaranteed. it puts a wire in the follicle and zaps it so it stops working. laser literally just shoots a laser at it. laser doesnt work* on light hairs. *so ive heard

@GeometriaSacris @furmerly It is as permanent as electrolysis if the follicle is successfully destroyed

@furmerly Laser hair removal is less time consuming and cheaper. But it's also not permanent to end only works on dark hairs. If you have a lot of blonde hairs they won't even be removed. Electrolysis is a lot more expensive and takes a lot longer but is one of the only actual permanent

@frottweilerr @furmerly Nd:yag 1064 nm works for much darker skin tones

@furmerly ive gotten both, and id recommend lazer if you can. electro is slow, expensive, and hurts like a bitch. id only recommend it if your hair is paler/skin is darker or your hair is less plentiful.

@amverynorm46621 @furmerly I don't think this is true laser should be able to completely destroy hair follicles, it's probably just not as effective at that job cause of different hair pigments and depths, especially when only using one wavelength. Electrolysis on the legs would take eons...

@furmerly electrolysis is permanent, laser is not

@hayakacz @destinedmorgan @furmerly Diode is good for thicker hairs, some systems use multiple wavelengths at the same time but diode is just common cause it's a middle ground that kind of works for everyone

@destinedmorgan @furmerly no, diode doesn't completely burn the hair folicules the wat Alex does, it's in a way a bit closer electrolysis

@sayuomi @thouarttoodear @kunokumas @AhaThe_Elation Homemade pasta wants less time not 5 times more...

@thouarttoodear @kunokumas @AhaThe_Elation well i make my own pasta so i have no instructions..

it disintegrated AGAIN. AGAIN AND AGAIN. im so tired i actually cannotndo this what am i doing wrong why is pasta of all things my arch nemesis

@vivibelowstars I'm a pedophile but

i'm like a pedophile but instead of being sexually attracted to children i'm sexually attracted to old hags like 6-7 times my age

Once the revolution starts anyone who refuses to call me comrade cumrag is getting shot on the spot