Adam Forni

1.4K posts

Adam Forni

Adam Forni

@xternality

24/7 carbon-free energy technologies and such @Google. Opinions my own.

Los Angeles, CA 가입일 Eylül 2011
1.8K 팔로잉1K 팔로워
Adam Forni 리트윗함
Todd Jones 🦊
Todd Jones 🦊@toddrjones·
Here are some ways in which the world has gotten better.
English
205
3.5K
21.4K
2.2M
Adam Forni
Adam Forni@xternality·
Amazing addition to the team! Welcome aboard @tylerhnorris, looking forward to great things.
Tyler Norris@tylerhnorris

Big professional update: I’m thrilled to share that I’ve joined @Google as Head of Market Innovation on the Advanced Energy team, and today is my first day. The power sector is undergoing a transformation as rapid load growth, emerging technologies, and ambitious decarbonization goals all converge. In this role, I’ll be focused on identifying and advancing innovations to better enable electricity markets to accommodate AI-driven demand and clean energy technologies. As I transition to the Bay Area, I'm excited to be joining a world-class team working at the frontier of energy innovation, and to collaborate with partners across the energy ecosystem. I'm also grateful that I can continue my PhD research and stay close to the research community. I wouldn't be here without the support of incredible mentors and colleagues at @DukeU and beyond – thank you for everything. Let’s get to work!

English
1
0
31
7.3K
Adam Forni 리트윗함
Jeff Dean
Jeff Dean@JeffDean·
AI efficiency is important. Today, Google is sharing a technical paper detailing our comprehensive methodology for measuring the environmental impact of Gemini inference. We estimate that the median Gemini Apps text prompt uses 0.24 watt-hours of energy (equivalent to watching an average TV for ~nine seconds), and consumes 0.26 milliliters of water (about five drops) — figures that are substantially lower than many public estimates. At the same time, our AI systems are becoming more efficient through research innovations and software and hardware efficiency improvements. From May 2024 to May 2025, the energy footprint of the median Gemini Apps text prompt dropped by 33x, and the total carbon footprint dropped by 44x, through a combination of model efficiency improvements, machine utilization improvements and additional clean energy procurement, all while delivering higher quality responses. See the blog or technical paper for more about our methodology and ongoing efforts. Blog: cloud.google.com/blog/products/… Link to detailed paper: services.google.com/fh/files/misc/…
Jeff Dean tweet mediaJeff Dean tweet media
English
151
801
4K
744.5K
Adam Forni
Adam Forni@xternality·
@Beazy_Rampezy I'm so impressed you have that! thank you Brett. Now to see the acceleration happen. Do we have staffing for this?
English
1
0
2
57
Brett Rampal
Brett Rampal@Beazy_Rampezy·
The NRC updated all its milestone schedules ahead of Commissioner Wright’s hearing today. None is longer than 18 months anymore. Astounding.
Brett Rampal tweet mediaBrett Rampal tweet mediaBrett Rampal tweet media
English
7
27
129
21.6K
Adam Forni 리트윗함
James Hewett
James Hewett@JamesHewettDC·
This is my quant... @ddpaolella talking about the new @Breakthrough GRIDS initiative to help speed up grid modeling and get study times down to weeks not months or years. Thanks @gurobi for having us in Berlin!
James Hewett tweet media
English
1
5
32
2K
Adam Forni
Adam Forni@xternality·
@nickvanosdol You'd get a much cheaper $/ton (maybe $100-150 avg) -- up to, say, a GT. Constrained innovation proving what techs might actually scale (across both DAC + point source). Flue stack retrofits not necessarily slam dunks, need long lived assets. Net positive for humanity, probly
English
0
0
0
46
nvo
nvo@nickvanosdol·
Thought experiment Shift every single $ poured into electrochemical DAC, in perpetuity, to carbon capture on flue stacks with 10%+ concentrated streams of CO2 until no such flue stacks exist Tell me why I’m dumb → heimildin.is/grein/24581/
English
7
1
7
1.3K
Duncan S. Campbell
Duncan S. Campbell@duncancampbell·
So far I’ve seen reports that Stargate plans to use natural gas, solar, and batteries to power their giant data centers. WHY AREN’T THEY USING NUCLEAR WTF?!?!?!
English
25
2
77
6.9K
Adam Forni
Adam Forni@xternality·
@JessePeltan Agree, generally. But all relevant tech are within ~1 order of mag of 1.0, so the math is done kinda automatically. Also, thinking in the $ M/MW can be useful to remind us that line items like a substation or admin building can cost many millions - scaling matters
English
0
0
0
55
Jesse Peltan
Jesse Peltan@JessePeltan·
“thousand dollars per kilowatt” “million dollars per megawatt” “billion dollars per gigawatt” $/W Please just use dollars per watt.
English
21
4
158
8.3K
Joel Edwards
Joel Edwards@joelhedwards·
nevada's NDOM compiles the best operational data in the west, monthly data for wells and fields re decline, it really depends on the operator and field, it can go both ways (decline, expand) eg, Ormat will expand fields until they start cooling off (meaning they'll keep twinning wells), other operators will sit on well fields that just hum along with no decline, while some operators develop fields so poorly so that they have rapid declines (>5%) right away, are forced to sell, and a new operator comes in and stabilizes it (eg blue mountain) along w the two prior examples, dixie valley has hummed along at 60 MWs for 40+ yrs (deep production well field) while ormat kept expanding mcginness hills until it started declining 2-3% at ~160 MWe (4 expansion phases) for new tech, flow got throtted back after ~3-4 months at project red, not sure why, perhaps to keep temps flat? (it's a pilot and they purposefully spaced those EGS wells tight, i'd bet on much better long term flow at cape station)
Joel Edwards tweet mediaJoel Edwards tweet mediaJoel Edwards tweet mediaJoel Edwards tweet media
English
1
0
1
35
Jesse Peltan
Jesse Peltan@JessePeltan·
Anybody have the decline curve for a solar farm?
Jesse Peltan tweet media
English
39
25
237
22.1K
Adam Forni
Adam Forni@xternality·
@joelhedwards @JessePeltan Fantastic, thanks, Joel. What is the data source there? I've heard generically 0.5% to 2% per year resource decline, that's wide range (4:1 ratio) but is it reasonable incl for newer techs?
English
1
0
0
29
Joel Edwards
Joel Edwards@joelhedwards·
depends on field and operator -operators usually push flow rates higher until they see a certain amount of temp decline to maximize NPV (eg mcginness hills) -deeper wells are more temp stable than shallower wells (eg dixie valley)
Joel Edwards tweet mediaJoel Edwards tweet media
English
1
0
1
27
Adam Forni
Adam Forni@xternality·
Burning fuels like oil, gas, and coal feels comfortable and familiar. We've been doing it in our homes for centuries. Human impact gradual. Hazards from things like batteries and nuclear feel much more exotic. Interaction much more rare. Education needed for long time to come.
Michael Thomas@curious_founder

Moss Landing, the largest battery in the US caught fire yesterday. A journalist just asked me, "Are batteries safe?" I told him the fossil fuel plants batteries replace kill 1,000s of people in the US / year. Batteries aren't perfect. But they're way better than coal/gas.

English
2
0
5
657
Adam Forni 리트윗함
Max Kanter
Max Kanter@maxk·
The speed at which batteries have taken over ancillary services in ERCOT is impressive!
Max Kanter tweet media
English
4
44
186
18.6K
Adam Forni
Adam Forni@xternality·
@gnievchenko Thank you for this psa, has been working for me since saw this tweet. Happy new year buddy
English
0
0
1
51
Adam Forni
Adam Forni@xternality·
@duncancampbell 93% for SMRs in early 2030s is ambitious, as the kinks get worked out. but, they are modular, and failure modes can be relatively isolated. there's probably a sweet spot of reactor MWe and # units for this type of application. there are diseconomies of scale the smaller you get
English
1
1
2
427