AI demo

Hermes Agent vs OpenClaw in 2026 🟠 Every Feature That Matters for Founders Who Run Their Own AI Agent Infrastructure 20+ Tips & Tricks for Running OpenClaw 2026.3.28 and Hermes Agent v0.5.0 in Production

APRIL 2026 The competitive dynamics are intensifying: each company is pushing a different lever, model power (Spud), model capability with safety concerns (Mythos), and inference efficiency (TurboQuant) 1️⃣ OpenAI is sacrificing entire product lines (Sora) to concentrate compute on its next frontier model, signaling that raw model capability is still the priority over product diversification. 2️⃣ Anthropic is building what it internally considers a dangerously powerful model while simultaneously struggling with basic operational security, a tension that underscores the gap between AI safety rhetoric and organizational execution. 3️⃣ Google is attacking the infrastructure layer, making all LLMs cheaper and faster to run, a move that benefits the entire ecosystem (including competitors) while also pressuring the hardware supply chain

.@ClementDelangue | that's not an emoji | Mythos is the Greek-rooted noun meaning a sacred narrative, plot structure, or symbolic worldview (used in philosophy since Aristotle and in science as a framework of meaning), while mytho is merely its truncated combining form (as in mythology, mythopoeia) with no independent standing in any formal discipline

Claude Mythos just leaked and it's Anthropic's most powerful model ever built Here are 3 things that matter right now: 1️⃣ Cybersecurity changes forever. Mythos finds and exploits software vulnerabilities beyond any existing AI. Anthropic is restricting access to defense-focused organizations first, offense potential is that serious. 2️⃣ A new model tier called "Capybara" sits above Opus. This signals Anthropic is restructuring its entire product line around frontier capabilities 3️⃣ Cost will gatekeep access. Running Mythos is extremely expensive, meaning enterprise-only pricing is likely at launch The AI arms race just accelerated overnight x.com/Mlearning_ai/s…

kill Sora, kill Atlas browser kill hardware experiments x.com/Mlearning_ai/s… @AnthropicAI captures 73% of new enterprise AI spending In January it was 50/50 with OpenAI In December, OpenAI led 60/40 Fidji Simo told staff: "We cannot miss this moment because we are distracted by side quests" @OpenAI still leads on total revenue ($25B vs $19B). But Anthropic is winning every new deal Revenue is a trailing indicator New customer share is a leading one

This alone explains why sora went dark x.com/Mlearning_ai/s…

Claude Code Can Auto-Dream Now My Rem-Dreamer Already Could I've run a custom rem-dreamer subagent since mid-2025 to let Claude dream over my artistic research project. Now @AnthropicAI shipped Auto-dream natively in @claudeai v2.1.81 They stack

the gap is setup 🟠 The Complete Claude Code Setup Guide From Beginner to Pro (March 2026)

Hot take: paying $100+/month for a frontier AI model is becoming the wrong default Mistral Small 4 (open source, Apache 2.0) matches GPT-OSS 120B on benchmarks with 3.5x shorter outputs. $0.15 per million input tokens. Or self-host for free on 4x H100. Open-source models now trail SOTA by only ~3 months. For 80% of production workloads, that gap is irrelevant. Run open-source first. Fall back to proprietary when you actually need it

he sits in a rolls-royce he holds a painting he promises to protect your wealth but omar wiseman... x.com/evARTology/sta…

$1,050/month Subscriptions 🟠 Claude Max $200/mo​ ChatGPT Pro $200/mo​ Cursor Ultra $200/mo (20× usage credits vs Pro) Perplexity Max $200/mo (includes Computer) Google AI Ultra $250/mo $1,050 in API Tokens ⬇️ Kimi K2.5 $0.45/$2.20 per M → 2,333M input / 477M output

The Ultimate 128GB Local LLM Hardware Battle Judging local inference (Qwen3.5-27B IQ4_NL ~16 GB) on top unified-memory machines: 1️⃣ AMD Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) ~$2,500 | ~16 tps decode | ~340–1,000 tps prefill | Windows Best $/token by far. Solid decode at half the price. Prefill lags behind both competitors. Software stack (Vulkan/ROCm) still needs tinkering 2️⃣ Apple Mac Studio M3 Ultra ~$5,000 | ~40+ tps decode | Strong prefill via MLX | macOS 800 GB/s bandwidth crushes decode fastest generation of the three. MLX ecosystem is polished and just works. Premium price for premium throughput. 3️⃣ NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10 Blackwell) ~$3,999 | ~17 tps decode | ~1,939 tps prefill | ARM64 Ubuntu Prefill monster, 5× faster than Halo for long-context ingestion. Decode is bandwidth-limited. CUDA ecosystem is unmatched for ML tooling and fine-tuning. EXO pooling with Mac Studio achieves 2.8× overall speedup

Tool most people missed: Claude-HUD It is a Claude Code plugin that shows you exactly what your agent is doing in real-time: 1️⃣ Context usage (how much of the window is consumed) 2️⃣ Active tools (which MCP servers are being called) 3️⃣ Running agents (subagent tree) 4️⃣ Todo progress (task completion %) 9,700+ stars #1 on GitHub Trending today Install it in Claude Code, zero config Solves the "black box" problem of long agent sessions

Your agent has access to your SSH keys right now. Here’s how to fix that in five minutes 🟠 NVIDIA OpenShell: 18+ Practical Tips to Run AI Agents Without Losing Sleep

Nearly a year after his death, Val Kilmer will appear on screen one final time in the independent film As Deep as the Grave, marking what producers call a "first-ever performance enabled by generative AI"

Everyone is chasing trillion-parameter models Mistral just shipped 119B total params with 6B active and it matches GPT-OSS 120B x.com/Mlearning_ai/s… Mistral Small 4 The insight most people miss: Active parameter count matters more than total parameter count. MoE architectures route each token through specialized experts. You get frontier quality at a fraction of the compute. Stop evaluating models by size. Start evaluating them by efficiency per token. The model that wins is not the biggest. It is the one that solves your task with the fewest resources

GPT-5.4 Mini and Nano Ship 🟠 OpenAI Just Repriced the Entire Multi-Agent Stack OpenAI shipped GPT-5.4 mini and nano yesterday, and the framing matters more than the benchmarks. They are purpose-built subagent models, the first time a frontier lab has explicitly designed model variants for the worker tier of multi-agent architectures. GPT-5.4 mini approaches full GPT-5.4 performance: 54.4% on SWE-Bench Pro (vs. 57.7% for the full model), 72.1% on OSWorld-Verified (vs. 75.0%). It runs 2x faster than GPT-5 mini with a 400K-token context window. In Codex, it consumes just 30% of your GPT-5.4 quota, meaning you get roughly 3.3x more agent tasks per dollar. Pricing: $0.75 / $4.50 per 1M tokens (input/output). GPT-5.4 nano is the cheapest GPT-5.4 variant at $0.20 / $1.25 per 1M tokens. Purpose: classification, data extraction, ranking, and lightweight subagents handling support tasks inside a multi-agent system. API only. The intended architecture is now explicit in the product. Use GPT-5.4 as the planning/coordination model. Use mini for worker agents doing coding, computer use, and tool calling. Use nano for classification and routing. OpenAI showed this pattern directly in their Codex documentation, a parent agent delegates to specialized subagents running cheaper models. The cost structure of multi-agent systems just became viable at scale. The catch: mini is 3x pricier than GPT-5 mini, and nano is 4x pricier than GPT-5 nano. You are paying more per token, but you need far fewer tokens for equivalent results.

Artists live outside the clock @midjourney V8 vs @GeminiApp vs @grok vs @ChatGPTapp x.com/evARTology/sta…

In 2026, @Midjourney went from seven fingers to eight on one hand congratulations, V8!

QuitGPT Movement Reaches 700K Pledges, Uninstalls Up 295% x.com/evARTology/sta… The QuitGPT boycott, triggered by OpenAI's Pentagon deal, has crossed 700,000 pledges. Sensor Tower reported ChatGPT mobile uninstalls jumped 295% day-over-day when the deal was announced