Cryptchamo

You remember? Buying all tickers except hyperliquid:native is a waste of time. Don’t forget, ALT season came from ethereum:native back in the years, it will come from HyperLiquid to HyperEVM and Perp very soon. What are you buying?

It' time hwostr.tech $HYPE just cracked the gates Which tier are you? Post your EVM address, you could enter the game 👇

You remember? Buying all tickers except hyperliquid:native is a waste of time. Don’t forget, ALT season came from ethereum:native back in the years, it will come from HyperLiquid to HyperEVM and Perp very soon. What are you buying?

@HWO_STR HYPIO WORLD ORDER 2026 TT

@HyperSwapX @altdotfun $HYPERO

Hello there, HyperEVM users! Which @altdotfun pools should we add incentives to? The two most-voted pools will receive incentives on HyperSwap for the coming month 👀

@Stitch3_ai Join the conversation - Stitch3-ee34b0c7-eWF1Z291cnQ

@VitalikButerin @ethereumfndn @aerugoettinea @grok pls a summary

Some of my perspective on where the @ethereumfndn is going. First of all, this is only my own view. The board is not just me, and I have no extra special powers on the board that the other board members do not. @aerugoettinea is the one executing much of this transition. My input has been largely on technical questions. The board is in the process of expanding, and my own power within the org will continue to decrease, which is honestly what I want. The 2025 era brought many important improvements to EF and its ability to execute. Many issues were resolved, and EF continues to benefit from its improved efficiency and greater focus on concrete goals to this day. And so with those problems resolved, early this year, the largest remaining hole that I perceived was something different nagging at me: I would regularly spot people saying things like "vitalik says these beautiful things about ethereum needing to be decentralized, and have privacy, and be a sanctuary technology, but why do the EF's actions not reflect that?" Now, you may have been hearing something different. You may not have been sensing a feeling of crisis at all, and maybe were hearing people saying that finally we were taking execution and BD seriously and the main task for us is to keep going that way and be even better and faster. Then probably there is genuine difference between you and me, in what kinds of criticism I take most seriously, and what kinds of critics through their criticism are most able to make me feel pain. As an analogy, let's briefly switch over to a different domain. One belief you can have about Google is that it is a success story, and has brought a lot of good to humanity in organizing the world's information. Another belief you can have about Google is that they had a beautiful idealistic beginning, but at some point the corruption of mainstream corporate attitudes seeped in, and they slowly bit by bit completely abandoned the "don't be evil" slogan. My belief on Google specifically is probably somewhere between the two. BUT, if you had taken me back in time to ~2008, and offered me a button to press to make Google one or two standard deviations more "dogmatic", eg. give Richard Stallman permanent veto power over some key policies, I would immediately press it. Why? Because a choice for one company is not a choice for the world, or even one country. Google existed and exists in the context of a technology industry generally drifting away from early idealistic don't-be-evil roots and toward greed for financial gain, totalizing visions of accelerated superintelligence, infiltration by sociopaths, and craven capitulation to (or worse, active participation in) government pressure for ideological control, surveillance and war. And so *one company* doing something different, positioning itself to be what George Bernard Shaw calls the Unreasonable Man, resisting the trend of the times, would have been better for freedom, balance of power and stability of society as a whole, than *all* large companies bending to dominant trends. This is a part of my version of pluralism. This line of thinking is not just mine, but I also is not too far off from what Aya and others had in mind with the Mandate. Now how does this all get to the role of the EF? EF is not a "center of Ethereum", rather EF is "one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes". We've always said that the EF should be the latter, but many in the Ethereum ecosystem (and even within the EF) wanted us to be the former. Now, we are taking action to ensure that we will be the latter. This is particularly important because EF is a limited organization, with limited resources and limited organizational capacity. The EF has only ~0.16% of all ETH (less than many other individual ETH holders), whereas among other blockchains it's common for "the central foundation" to have 10-50%. Fiscally, the EF was originally designed to fulfill a limited work scope defined in the token sale docs and other pre-launch materials (building the chain software; getting through Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity), which was fully completed in 2022; it was not designed to be an eternal steward. And so today, the EF is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity over breadth (yes, this means we sell less ETH). The EF focuses *specifically* on those activities critical to the success of ethereum as a censorship/capture-resistant, open, private and secure system, that would not happen otherwise. This means making hard choices, and in some cases even activities that we highly approve of and people that we highly respect becoming outside of the EF. People of great technical talent, public respect and even alignment with the mission and CROPS being outside of the EF is in fact necessary if we want important tasks to be able to attract outside capital. This also means the EF taking opinionated stands culturally. This is all intended in cooperation with all other parts of ethereum. We recognize that many other parts of the ethereum world highly respect CROPS and related values. But highly respecting is not the same as choosing to specialize and totally dedicate to a domain (Compare in a different domain: I think reducing animal cruelty is important, and I like vegan food, but am not full unconditional vegan myself) EF is still in a transition period, and we expect its new long-term form to stabilize over the next few months. What are the guiding principles of this new form? Again, I am only one person, but I can give my answer from a technical perspective (there are also critical non-technical aspects). At the core, *Ethereum must be impressive*. We are living in an age of highly intelligent AI and all kinds of other technological acceleration. "Status quo EVM, with a hard fork or two a year to optimize for short-term needs of users" is not interesting. To some, "impressive" means: 250ms latency and 1M TPS. I think Ethereum trying to go that route is a mistake. Being as fast and as scalable as possible, and only a small epsilon more decentralized than the others, is a route to mediocrity, and if we try it we will lose. I think Ethereum should scale. But I think Ethereum should strive the hardest to be deeply impressive in a different dimension: the CROPS dimension. This means things like: * Provably bug-free Ethereum. This is a goal that all cybersecurity researchers would have thought is absurd and impossible, up until roughly 6 months ago. Now, it's on the cusp of being possible, thanks to AI-assisted formal verification. So we should be frontrunners in doing this. * Available chain consensus. Ethereum is, and with lean consensus will cotninue to be, the ONLY chain that has both (i) traditional-BFT style properties that it's safe under asynchrony up to a high level of fault tolerance, and (ii) the bitcoin PoW-style property that under synchrony it's safe up to 49% attackers. As far as I can tell, literally no other chain has this or is planning for it; bitcoin goes for (ii) only and most other chains go for (i) only. Some will remember I fought hard for this, Unreasonably insisting that it is not OK for ethereum to rely on social consensus and hard forks to rescue ethereum from 34% of nodes going offline. It's OK for chains like hyperledger, bnb, solana, tempo, etc. It's not OK for bitcoin or ethereum or eg. zcash. * Intermediary minimization. The fact that smart contract wallets, protocols like railgun, etc have to send transactions through intermediaries to get included onchain is honestly embarrassing, and it's a constant point of fragility. Hence the work on FOCIL and EIP-8141 (and 7701 and years of work before) to make transaction sending intermediary-minimized with public mempool and strong inclusion properties, in a truly general-purpose way, that covers not just eg. secp256r1, but also privacy protocols and much more. Kohaku is pushing intermediary minimization at the user layer, pulling Ethereum away from the dystopian status quo world where our wallets don't even verify the chain, send our private data out to a dozen third-party servers, and toward a brighter CROPS future. Some of these goals are Unreasonable - maybe Ethereum would be "fine" getting only 50% of the way - what if we depend on intermediaries, but make it easy to switch? But going 50% of the way would not make Ethereum Deeply Impressive in the CROPS way. So we push for 100%. Fortunately all these goals are compatible with high TPS, this is a major focus of research (esp. on scaling the state). Well-designed L2s can also help, especially L2s optimized for specific applications (eg. high-volume trading, privacy...). These goals are even compatible with significantly lower slot times, thanks to Raul's work on erasure-coded P2P, and many other optimizations. The most high-value "product" of the ethereum blockchain, financially speaking, is ETH the asset. Ethereum secures $250 billion of ETH. The types of properties of Ethereum that I mentioned above are very good for ETH the asset. Nearly 90% of my net worth is in ETH, and most of the remainder is ~$40m of onchain fiat of which every dollar has already been allocated for some open-source biotech or software or hardware initiative. That said, there are aspects of supporting ETH the asset - *necessary* aspects even - that are outside the scope of the EF. This is where we need other heroes (some of whom hold more ETH than the EF does) to step in and help. EF has been recently thinking more about how it will relate to other such organizations, and give them needed initial support. EF will be a smaller ship than in previous years, a more opinionated one - in some cases more opinionated in ways that might be difficult to comprehend - but a longer-lasting one, and one suited to making sure that ethereum brings something meaningful to the world. We are grateful to all those inside and outside the EF who are helping to make this happen.

@Stizzy00 @altdotfun Why you not showing MC, ashamed?

Surely the 5x lev on @altdotfun is doing its job $HYPE is up 14% today most of alt fun tokens followed with +40-50% moves my bags are proof that this model works

Normalising alcohol is the biggest illness ever. If it's fine for you, the result is the same for 80% of humans. It will never bring you the best of yourself. Maybe you are fine, RN and that's great but at one point, you will face that with alcohol in your blood, you will regret having it one day. For just maybe a word you have said, or anything else being under it's influence

We have to be near the bottom of alcohol sentiment Having a few glasses of good wine with friends is one of the finer pleasures in life If it ruins your life for 3 days, that’s a you problem

@Yoliu_ Ptdr, en faite il me counter trade

@Cryptchamo il a osé shill l'horrible dreamcahs derrière comme le deuxieme hyperliquid

Pls if you like making money, mute this account

@AddictCryptoBoy @La_Piece_Cachee Ah bah il mérite sa sauce. Dire de vendre un asset qui retape 13% 2h après, faut être un sacré guignol

@La_Piece_Cachee Le paure il se fait enchaîner aujourd'hui le rabbit Regarde @Cryptchamo

Hahaha la nouvelle feature X est là pour abattre

@AddictCryptoBoy Stat ou pas y’a des pauvres gens qui écoute un mec qui a arrêter d’être flic pour faire de la crypto mais qui gagne la plus grande partie via ses commissions de partages de tokens aux oubliettes

@Cryptchamo Non de dire d'unfollow un mec déjà qu'il fait plus aucune stats 🤣

@mk4_lul 6 fig actually buddy

dude with a 4-fig portfolio is clowning on loracle’s (hedged) $hype short

@AddictCryptoBoy De quoi qui est violent? De pas vouloir perdre de l’argent ?

@Cryptchamo C'est violent mais je suis d'accord

@0xWasa he shill a way to lose money or to pvp your own brother on extractive tokens yeh

@Cryptchamo This guy only shill retarded altcoins

@sp500bullish @alrightbuddyHL Nah I will never buy this token again lol $HYPERO better

@Cryptchamo I’m sure it will come $buddy get ready @alrightbuddyHL

i copytraded Loracle and i went full port short on $HYPE with 2x leverage that will completely liquidate me and lose all my life savings if price reaches $69 i dont know what to do please help me i beg you .hl people stop buying i cant anymore u won i admit it pls stop my wife is pregnant and i wont be able to feed my son

@CryptoKage He say that $HYPE is the next FTX basically and many other shitty POV. I don't know if he just needs attention or really believing it

@Cryptchamo I can't read it, is it written in 'tard ?

@MonsieuRabbit Wahh j'en ai vu des tweets de merde.. Mais la: Entre la gorge profonde a High stake qui a clairement ecris qu'il sort par pur profit. Et les datas "inflations" sortit de ton trou de balle. WAHH Et j'ai lu en mode y aura quelque chose de coherent mais RIEN..

🚨 $HYPE / Hyperliquid : La lune de miel touche à sa fin Tout le monde célèbre les volumes massifs, l'arrivée des instits, HIP3/4/5... les news bullish, la FDV supérieure à Solana etc etc mais personne ne regarde sous le capot ! Voici pourquoi l'écosystème Hyperliquid s'approche d'un mur de briques, et pourquoi les gros portefeuilles s'apprêtent à dump sur les investisseurs particuliers 👇🧵 1️⃣ L'avertissement de High Stake Capital Quand l'un des plus gros faiseurs de marché et scalpeurs de l'écosystème tire la sonnette d'alarme, on écoute. Le constat est simple : la liquidité actuelle est artificielle. Elle est dopée par des boucles de "wash trading" institutionnel et des incitations de farming qui ne dureront pas (il n'y aura pas de 2ème airdrop). Une fois les subventions terminées, les market makers vont migrer, et les spreads vont exploser. 2️⃣ La menace de l'hyper-inflation du jeton Le $HYPE souffre du syndrome classique des tokens de DeFi de nouvelle génération : Un calendrier d'émissions (unlocks) massif qui arrive à grands pas Une pression vendeuse continue des early adopters qui n'ont aucun intérêt à staker sur le long terme un actif hautement volatil 3️⃣ Le mirage de la centralisation déguisée Hyperliquid se vend comme le roi du DEX, mais l'infrastructure technique repose sur un consensus ultra-fermé. Si un régulateur (SEC ou autre) décide de s'attaquer aux nœuds clés ou à l'équipe fondatrice, le protocole n'a aucun moyen de survivre en mode 100% résistant à la censure (par le passé ils ont déjà montré leur contrôle sur le "DEX" ; seulement 30 validateurs) 4⃣ le prochain FTX Hack de LAZARUS (Corée du Nord), exploits, fuite de vaults... aucun procole n'est à l'abri à part Bitcoin (on l'a vu récemment en DeFI avec Kelp/AAVE & Drift) Si ça arrive sur Hyperliquid, c'est game over 5⃣ Valorisation absurde Plus grosse que la plupart des CEX alors que c’est un perp DEX avec des risques systémiques, réfléchissez y à 2 fois En résumé : Ne soyez pas l'exit liquidity des gros poissons Le narratif est beau, le token peut aller plus haut, mais la réalité des flux financiers montre déjà des signes d'épuisement Vendez quand les autres FOMO, achetez quand ils ont peur Faites vos propres recherches, protégez votre capital. 📉