DonCC

INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION PRESS STATEMENT RE: ALLEGED MISUSE OF AUTHORISED ACCESS CREDENTIALS AND UNAUTHORISED DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION FROM THE COMMISSION’S CONTINUOUS VOTER REGISTRATION (CVR) DATABASE The attention of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has been drawn to allegations currently circulating on social media and in some sections of the media regarding the alleged unauthorised access to the Commission's Continuous Voter Registration (CVR) database and the subsequent publication of information on a candidate in the recent primaries of a political party in the Federal Capital Territory. The Commission takes this allegation seriously and has immediately commenced a thorough investigation to establish the facts surrounding the incident. As part of the ongoing Continuous Voter Registration (CVR) exercise nationwide, authorised INEC Registration Officers were granted controlled access to specific components of the CVR system to enable them register new applicants, process requests for transfer of registration and update voter records where necessary. Such access is restricted to official duties only and is withdrawn at the conclusion of the exercise. The audit trail from the preliminary investigation has enabled the Commission to identify the user account through which the information was accessed. Accordingly, relevant personnel have been questioned, and all units connected with the incident are cooperating fully with the investigation. The Commission is also examining all technical, administrative and operational factors associated with the matter in order to establish individual responsibility and determine the circumstances surrounding the use of those credentials and identify any breach of internal access-control protocols before taking appropriate action against anyone involved. Preliminary findings from the Commission's audit trail so far, however, indicate that there was no external breach of the CVR database, no hacking incident, and no unauthorised external access to the Commission's ICT infrastructure. Rather, the information in question was accessed through valid user credentials assigned to personnel participating in the ongoing CVR exercise but released without authority. The incident under investigation relates to the retrieval of a specific voter record and does not indicate any compromise of the Commission's broader voter registration infrastructure or the personal data of over 90 million registered voters. The Commission wishes to state categorically that it takes the security, confidentiality and integrity of voter data with the utmost seriousness and remains committed to transparency, institutional integrity, and the protection of voters' personal information. Furthermore, the Department of State Services (DSS), on its own accord, has commenced an independent investigation into the matter. The Commission will continue to cooperate fully with all relevant security agencies and will not hesitate to refer any person found culpable for appropriate legal action. Members of the public and the media are therefore urged to disregard unfounded speculations while investigations remain ongoing. The Commission will continue to keep the public informed of its final findings and any measures taken in response to the incident in due course. Mohammed Kudu Haruna National Commissioner and Chairman, Information and Voter Education Committee (IVEC) 2nd June, 2026

I have just read the affidavit sworn by Anita Baaki, the other lady who visited the “Honourable” Minister Dave Umahi alongside the late Mary Habila. It convinced me even more that there appears to be a concerted effort to silence the truth. Aside from her tribute (post) to her late friend, Mary, on Instagram on July 1st, Anita has remained silent until her affidavit was made public. Her Instagram post is her last post across social media. She was in Dave Umahi’s residence when the incident happened. If she had left his house before this affidavit, it would have been public. More so, she has been shielded from the media and cannot appear in te public. Her affidavit dropped from nowhere, with her whereabouts still unknown. She is not “wanted,” there is no arrest warrant nor is she accused of being complicit in the case, why then is she hiding? Aside from the inconsistencies in the narrative in comparison with Dave Umahi’s, paragraph 11 of her affidavit raises strong suspicion. Someone who appears to be hiding can’t depose an affidavit that is free from coercion, inducement, or influence. That she denied it simply tells us that there is such a possibility. More so, the contradictory narratives flying and the family of the young lady refusing to conduct an autopsy and speak with the media solidify the suspicion that there may be a grand plan to cover up the truth in the story.✍️