daniellittledev@threads.net banner
daniellittledev@threads.net

@daniellittledev

Software Developer. People first. I value trust, kindness and learning. I enjoy dev-ing with dotnet, Type Safety, FP, and Distributed Systems. (Aus +10 GMT)

Australia Katılım Haziran 2008
447 Takip Edilen374 Takipçiler
[email protected] retweetledi
daniellittledev@threads.net
[email protected]@daniellittledev·
Google will index your choice for a twitter poll (without any context, no question just the answer), so now my last poll is a top result if you google daniellittledev🤦
English
0
0
0
45
daniellittledev@threads.net
[email protected]@daniellittledev·
@MladenMacanovic Developer: Knowing more than just C# will make you a better developer. Blazor Developer: Never 😭, C# is all I need
English
0
0
0
22
Mladen Macanović
Mladen Macanović@MladenMacanovic·
How to make a Blazor developer cry in 5 words or less?
English
51
3
30
21.8K
daniellittledev@threads.net
[email protected]@daniellittledev·
@codemullins It's not ideal but you could do something like this. The two main issues are generics don't work well, but that's not an issue for a concrete use case. The second issue is discoverability which could be an issue depending on what you want.
daniellittledev@threads.net tweet media
English
0
0
0
13
Cody Mullins
Cody Mullins@codemullins·
@daniellittledev it does remind me a bit of the thing people laugh about with REST — 200 OK with an error in the body but i do think that is a nicer paradigm
English
1
0
1
68
Cody Mullins
Cody Mullins@codemullins·
Examples for gRPC in #dotnet show throwing exceptions for validation. I'm not sure how I feel about it. Here's an example where I'm conflicted. Which do you think is the better approach, from the perspective of a developer calling the gRPC service?
Cody Mullins tweet media
English
12
0
10
2.3K
daniellittledev@threads.net
[email protected]@daniellittledev·
@michaeljolley Why do something the compiler can do better? Better to use type inference as much as possible. If you use a functions result it's already type checked. Another type definition is just redundant. If you're serious about exploring more, try having a look at some fsharp code
English
0
0
0
17
Michael Jolley
Michael Jolley@michaeljolley·
My .NET 🌶️ take? We should all stop using the 'var' keyword. Why? 📹below.
English
117
7
107
239.7K
daniellittledev@threads.net
[email protected]@daniellittledev·
@davidfowl This issue is a prime target for Aspire, if only the development was finished. Maybe someone like yourself could help expedite it. It would plug a huge hole for dotnet and azure development.
English
1
0
1
110
daniellittledev@threads.net
[email protected]@daniellittledev·
@davidfowl I was commenting on the fact that development to run service bus locally has finally started as of Jul 31, 2023 after the issue was opened five years earlier on Aug 16, 2018
English
1
0
1
98
David Fowler
David Fowler@davidfowl·
Not having to mess with ports and connection information when you're getting started is so nice. Lowers the barrier to entry for trying stuff out. #dotnet #aspire
David Fowler tweet media
English
19
22
221
24K
Dennis Doomen
Dennis Doomen@ddoomen·
Poll of the Day: Do you prefer var or explicit type names when declaring variables in C#?
English
16
0
4
1.5K
Changelog
Changelog@changelog·
💥 It's time for Changelog & Friends! 💬 HATEOAS corpus 🎤 with @jerodsanto & @skriptble What makes a good API? Is GraphQL a solid choice? Why do we do REST wrong? And WTF does HATEOAS mean, anyway? 💚 changelog.com/friends/24
English
1
3
5
2.5K
daniellittledev@threads.net
[email protected]@daniellittledev·
Threads is now avalible on the web
English
1
0
1
55
Konrad Kokosa
Konrad Kokosa@konradkokosa·
Syntax - it's just clean and concise. De gustibus non est disputandum
English
2
0
31
5.6K
Konrad Kokosa
Konrad Kokosa@konradkokosa·
Here's what I like in C# & .NET👇
English
25
36
232
52K
fks
fks@FredKSchott·
There have been zero commits to the Gatsby repo in the last 24 days.
English
62
28
579
288K