Paula Manrique

🚨JED WALLACE'S OPPOSITION TO LIVELY'S MOTION TO DISMISS - AND PROBABLY THE FUNNIEST FILING I'VE READ IN A LONG TIME!🚨 🧵🌶️ 1. This is going to be a long one but worth it. It's very colourful because there are a lot of talking points. I am going to include the whole motion to dismiss with the 4 image restriction. It's very snarky. Charles Babcock cares about his client and cuts through the opposition's bullshit. In 💛we get the first snark. Wallace basically calls Lively's motion to dismiss introduction, horseshit, but in a professional and dignified manner. In 🧡Wallace points that Lively has not provided any sworn statement to support her personal jurisdictional arguments. In 🩷Wallace details all the connections that Lively has, herself, created that are relevant to this lawsuit. In 💙Wallace states that Lively is seeking her dismissal on the basis that he has not adequately pleaded a claim for defamation. Wallace says that if he hasn't plead sufficiently, then of course Lively should be dismissed but "stating the obvious does not make it reality" 😂 Wallace alleges he has sufficiently pleaded his claim for defamation. In 💜"Lively's lengthy 'factual background' is almost all about her".🤣🤣 Wallace blasts Lively for basically bragging about herself, her career, her claims against Baldoni who has a billionaire friend, the allegations against Wayfarer, her contractual rider with Wayfarer - whilst basically saying next to nothing about Wallace and Street. That paragraph alone is fantastic read. In 💚Wallace points out he was never on the set of IEWU, never had any relationship with Lively, never harassed her and never entered any contract with her. He was also not brought on until more than a year after she alleges the harassment took place. In 💛Wallace brushes off Lively's assertion that Street was recently incorporated as a California business as a mere "fun fact" as it's principal place of business has been in Texas for a number of years now. He also says that Lively skipped over entirely the period that Wallace was an independent contractor to TAG in her history of Street and only mentions it against when she refers to the CRD "draft complaint". Wallace also states that a number of Lively's causes of action are outside the jurisdiction of wither the CRD or the EEOC - such as breach of contract and negligence (amongst others).