Helen Lewis

1.6K posts

Helen Lewis banner
Helen Lewis

Helen Lewis

@helenlewis

staff writer, @theatlantic | contact me: [email protected]

Katılım Haziran 2007
4.2K Takip Edilen144.7K Takipçiler
Tyler Austin Harper
Tyler Austin Harper@Tyler_A_Harper·
If I have this right, West’s husband says West is racist for not letting him cheat, West says her critics are racist for being mean to her husband’s Iranian girlfriend on Persian New Year, and now the Iranian girlfriend says the Slate writer is racist for noticing Aham sucks?
Slate@Slate

Kate Lindsay and Scaachi Koul discuss the internet’s response to Lindy West’s new book—and how its subjects are firing back. slate.trib.al/x5cLKHQ

English
29
53
898
121K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
I’ve never thought about it like this before, but the TERF wars of the late 2010s were as radicalising for a cohort of feminists as the Salman Rushdie fatwa was for the liberals of a generation earlier. People that you assumed cared about free speech just … backed away.
English
41
142
1.3K
81.4K
Helen Lewis retweetledi
nxthompson
nxthompson@nxthompson·
This @mckaycoppins story on his quest to uncover the truth about a Mexican athlete who claimed he was kidnapped by a cartel and forced to compete in a life-or-death sports tournament is bonkers in about 10 different ways. theatlantic.com/magazine/2026/…
English
2
7
22
10.5K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
@WillardFoxton You know I don’t step on Man History on main (too much grief) but this intersects strongly with proper decorous lady history (Mitfords and posh suffragettes) so I feel qualified to say: what are you vaping, Tucker?
English
1
0
35
2.8K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
@MauriceMaus Certainly a bold choice — and one gambling on Americans’ lack of interest in European history — to make an argument premised on “I am the Oswald Mosley of today”. Apart from anything else, he achieved none of his aims and died in exile.
English
0
3
37
2.8K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
@Noahpinion How do you justify making that illegal and not, say, an LLM hallucinating quotes and attributing them to me (or any other named writer)? Both situations raise the same ethical and reputational questions.
English
1
0
16
3.5K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
@EdwardoBankio Hmm, I think it’s useful to differentiate between suicide (and other) bombers, and other terrorists, and shooters with this particular profile.
English
3
0
43
5.9K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
It is very strange to publish an article on the gender dynamics of mass shooters and not mention that the two "female" shooters used as flagship examples here were biologically male. Males commit more than 90% of violent crimes.
Helen Lewis tweet media
English
102
955
5.4K
158.7K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
@John_Stepek @JohannLamont Yes, although some of the stuff mentioned (eg gore forums) isn’t strictly social media in the way we’d think of it now. And in any case, has been around since at least the 90s, cf rotten dot com
English
0
0
64
6.3K
John Stepek
John Stepek@John_Stepek·
@helenlewis @JohannLamont This is because (I'm guessing, I haven't read the piece and I apologise in advance if I'm clearly wrong) the aim is not to highlight male violence but instead to advance an argument to control social media, or specific groups thereon
English
3
2
74
7.4K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
@CathyYoung63 This feels like a correction to a point I didn’t make? If the authors wanted to write about a recent female mass shooter, Audrey Hale was right there. (Hale was FTM.)
English
3
0
56
1.1K
Cathy Young 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱
@helenlewis Female mass shooters do exist, though - I recall that when a woman shot up YouTube headquarters, some people kept trying to claim she was transgender even when there was extensive information to the contrary.
English
1
0
3
1.3K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
@PubIicReIation @herandrews You've misunderstood my target -- I was referring to the use of Martin Scriblerus to satirise their literary contemporaries (which Pope then further developed under his own name in The Dunciad).
English
0
0
8
1.4K
Dog
Dog@PubIicReIation·
How exactly did the Scriblerus Club trash their old side? Tories satirising Whigs doesn't strike me as to having much to do with honour codes; the Scriblerus Club was open about who was in it, just not attributing who the exact author was. Very loose and desperate comparison - really weak stuff.
English
1
0
14
1.7K
Helen Andrews
Helen Andrews@herandrews·
Mostly this piece is boring and predictable but I will say that “Don’t publicly trash your old side unless you’re willing to put your name next to it” is one of those honor-based rules of open conflict that feminized societies just don’t get, so thanks for illustrating the point.
Helen Andrews tweet media
New York Magazine@NYMag

Female defectors say the MAGA movement has dropped the pretense of protecting women and now demands submission while ‘advertising it will be cruel and fickle.’ nymag.com/intelligencer/…

English
129
176
2.3K
509K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
@CostelloWilliam I've listened to a fair bit of Call Her Daddy, and I didn't hear anything that registered to me as misandry -- could you give me an example of what you're thinking of?
English
9
1
147
22.6K
William Costello
William Costello@CostelloWilliam·
There’s a strange asymmetry where relatively niche manosphere slop content is treated like a major cultural threat, while massively popular female-oriented content (e.g., Call Her Daddy) whose popularity builds on misandry and sowing conflict between the sexes rarely receives any scrutiny. Meanwhile, the male-oriented podcasts that actually dominate the charts (@hubermanlab and Modern Wisdom) are about healthy physical and intellectual self-improvement. That tells you far more about what most young men actually find aspirational. The kids are alright!
William Costello tweet media
William Costello@CostelloWilliam

Just finished the @louistheroux manosphere doc. He definitely made them look silly at times (which isn’t hard tbf). But ultimately these guys don’t care how they come across. The clicks and attention are all they care about. What the doc never really interrogates is whether their “influence” is actually as large as people assume. My intuition is that their content is just slop for low IQ teenagers and not really that influential.

English
88
217
3.1K
446.9K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
@PlinthBotherer5 Yes, the piece makes a good case that a weekend in Vegas with your mates every once in a while is very different to having three million betting opportunities 24/7 through your smartphone, which you use at home, alone.
English
0
1
63
3.1K
Adam 🇺🇦
Adam 🇺🇦@PlinthBotherer5·
@helenlewis In Britain between 1961 and the advent of the smartphone(ish) we enjoyed an exceptionally orderly and well regulated gambling industry, so punters could generally find their level. The US went in almost completely cold, socially naive, with no antibodies to the weirder stuff
English
3
1
42
3.8K
Helen Lewis
Helen Lewis@helenlewis·
"Practically overnight, we took an ancient vice—long regarded as soul-rotting and civilizationally ruinous—put it on everyone’s phone, and made it as normal and frictionless as checking the weather. What could possibly go wrong?"
McKay Coppins@mckaycoppins

Last year, The Atlantic gave me $10K to gamble with. What started as a journalistic gimmick turned into something more... unnerving. My cover story on the online betting boom warping sports, culture, politics, and the psyches of millions of young men: theatlantic.com/magazine/2026/…

English
18
556
6.3K
277K