Keith Kupferschmid
2.4K posts

Keith Kupferschmid
@keithkup
CEO of the Copyright Alliance and die-hard Pittsburgh Pirates fan








@PamelaSamuelson I haven’t been closely following the Restatement project for some time now, but the complaints about process have been consistent & uniform…and from people I trust. Putting this down as “sore losing” as opposed to resistance to policy preferences framed as law seems unfair.


“Just because a payment is small doesn’t mean a creator doesn’t want it,” @fairlytrained CEO @ednewtonrex tells #BrainstormAI of AI copyright issues. “It doesn’t give you the right to take their work without permission.” trib.al/zkkNqHh




@MikeNelson @vkhosla Please don’t delete your post. I want it to exist. I want lots of people to see it. I want artists around the world to recognize what we’re up against. That some think that exploitation is the essence of America. In many ways you are perhaps tragically right. Here, you are not.


*chef's kiss* bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…


Generative AI companies call their use of copyrighted work to train models 'transformative' because they hope this gets them off the hook legally. It doesn't. Two important things to remember about 'transformative' use of copyrighted work, outlined here by Jane C. Ginsburg: 1. Simply transforming something doesn't make it 'transformative' in this context. Transformativeness is not just a measure of distance in e.g. pixel space; it includes the *purpose* of the use. 2. Even if a use *is* judged to be transformative (see 1), transformativeness is not the only factor in fair use decisions. If you hear people describing their use of copyrighted work for AI training as 'transformative', please bear this in mind: the output being aesthetically different to the input does not necessarily make the use 'transformative' in the eyes of the law, and there is lots besides transformativeness that is important. scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_schola…




