
Machi Big Brother
3.4K posts



if @token_works @Rhynotic wants $FWA to be successful they have to limit the amount you can put against low floor NFT's collections. Because right now you're basically just ripping packs for ETH. This is "legendary" pulls right now

mando made +$18 million from one trade everyday when we log into twitter, we see amazing pnls from single trades, usually took a few days to a week to make there is another side, where high conviction plays out over time, this is one of those examples

friend tech was really a lit time



@token_works Can you also put a cap on ETH value to NFT deposits? Like 10:1 or something so people can’t keep abusing with tons of ETH and a TTT deposit? These deposits just rake the rest of the field.












seems reasonable to disregard the nft as a depositor if you're just farming rewards. but I imagine once farming slows down we start to see more nft listings. EV on any deposit that's not the top is positive, but barely. May as well deposit to aave. however barely positive EV as a way to list an NFT still makes sense. Assuming you're not getting the top listing bonus: - backing a low value NFT with 100 eth, you expect a return of roughly 3 eth profit (and your nft back) - backing a grail nft worth ~100 eth with 100 eth, you expect a return of approximately 3 eth, with the added potential of effectively selling the nft for ~100 eth. The difference is subtle but I think it tips the scale in favor of backing nfts with fair valuations. At least I hope so.



@OGDfarmer it's not my job or the protocols to know the price of an NFT what about golden apes? alien punks? this allows depositors to try to set a "fair" value and purchasers to decide if it's mispriced. x.com/0xQuit/status/…








