Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️

49.9K posts

Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ banner
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️

Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️

@mkheck

Computer scientist+MBA, pilot, inglés+español. @Java_Champions, ⭐️presenter, author @springbootbook. Ex @Oracle, @Pivotal, @VMware, @Microsoft

St. Louis, MO Katılım Ocak 2012
3.3K Takip Edilen18.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️
Learn something new every day. Some days this is easy; some days, you have to claw for it. Do it anyway. To learn is to grow.
English
19
153
497
0
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
Bob Golen
Bob Golen@BobGolen·
There is no McTry. Only McDo.
Bob Golen tweet media
English
323
4.7K
40.6K
958.9K
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
Hedgie
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets·
🦔A researcher invented a fake eye condition called bixonimania, uploaded two obviously fraudulent papers about it to an academic server, and watched major AI systems present it as real medicine within weeks. The fake papers thanked Starfleet Academy, cited funding from the Professor Sideshow Bob Foundation and the University of Fellowship of the Ring, and stated mid-paper that the entire thing was made up. Google's Gemini told users it was caused by blue light. Perplexity cited its prevalence at one in 90,000 people. ChatGPT advised users whether their symptoms matched. The fake research was then cited in a peer-reviewed journal that only retracted it after Nature contacted the publisher. My Take The researcher made the papers as obviously fake as possible on purpose. The AI systems didn't catch it. Neither did the human researchers who cited it in real journals, which means people are feeding AI-generated references into their work without reading what they're actually citing. I've covered the FDA using AI for drug review, the NYC hospital CEO ready to replace radiologists, and ChatGPT Health launching this year. All of that is happening in the same environment where a condition funded by a Simpsons character and endorsed by the crew of the Enterprise was being presented as emerging medical consensus. The people making these deployment decisions seem to believe the pipeline from research to AI to patient is more supervised than it actually is. This experiment suggests it isn't supervised much at all. Hedgie🤗 nature.com/articles/d4158…
English
783
12.4K
27.2K
1.2M
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Let me explain exactly why Apple still uses drag-to-install in 2026, because the joke here accidentally proves Apple right. A macOS .app is a single self-contained folder disguised as a file. Every dependency, every framework, every resource lives inside it. Drag it to Applications, it works. Drag it to Trash, it's gone. No registry entries. No leftover DLLs. No uninstaller that misses half the files. Windows installers scatter fragments across Program Files, AppData, the registry, system32, and a dozen temp directories. Uninstalling a Windows app is an archaeological dig. Five years later you're still finding config files from software you forgot you owned. Linux is worse. Dependency hell is so common they named it. Entire package managers exist to solve the problem of "I installed something and now nothing else works." Flatpak and Snap were invented specifically to copy what macOS bundles already did natively. The macOS bundle architecture came from NeXTSTEP in 1989. Steve Jobs brought it to OS X in 2001. The core design hasn't changed because the core design was correct. An app is a folder. Installation is a copy. Removal is a delete. Three operations that map perfectly to how humans already think about files. The drag-to-install window with the arrow isn't lazy UX. It's the entire thesis of the system made visible. You are literally just moving a folder. There is no "installation" step because there's nothing to install. The app is already complete. Every other OS eventually tried to get here. Windows got MSIX. Linux got Flatpak. Mobile figured it out from day one because phones shipped after Apple proved the model. The pattern everyone else converged toward is the pattern this tweet is calling outdated. The funniest part: the app being dragged in that screenshot is Claude. An AI that can write code, analyze documents, and reason about complex systems. And the most advanced step in getting it onto your machine is holding down a mouse button and moving your wrist two inches to the right. That's not a design failure. That's a 37-year-old architecture so good that the most sophisticated software on earth still ships inside it.
Noah Cat@Cartidise

it’s 2026 and this is how you install apps on macOS

English
347
1.3K
12.1K
1.6M
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Microsoft's stock just had its worst quarter since the 2008 financial crisis. Down 23%. Worse than every other Mag 7 name. And this screenshot explains why. Nadella started personally PM-ing Copilot in December. Told engineers the Outlook and Gmail integrations "for the most part don't really work." Held weekly grilling sessions with 100 senior engineers. Reshuffled Mustafa Suleyman out of consumer Copilot. Brought in a former Snap exec to run the whole thing. Then reorganized the entire AI division again two weeks ago. Four months of CEO-level intervention, and the AI still can't add a table to a Word document. Microsoft charges $30/user/month for this. 446 million M365 seats. 15 million have converted after two years. 3.3%. Of those, only 35.8% actively use it. That's ~5.4 million people paying $360/year for an AI that opens a browser tab when you ask it to edit the file you're in. Copilot's paid subscriber share dropped from 18.8% to 11.5% in six months. Gemini passed it. Their fix? A $99/user/month E7 tier in May. Same broken product, 65% more expensive, sold to the CIO who will never personally ask Copilot to insert a table. Yesterday the stock popped because Microsoft's $13.8B in OpenAI turned into a $135B stake. A 10x return on paper. The market celebrated. But that gain is an accounting event. The product you ship to 446 million users is the business. Meanwhile, Anthropic went from $61B to $380B in under a year. $19B in annualized revenue. 120+ features shipped in 90 days. Claude writes directly into your document, your codebase, your spreadsheet. The dollars flowing out of Microsoft's market cap are flowing into companies where the AI actually modifies the file.
Daniel Lemire@lemire

I am in Microsoft Word. I press Copilot. I ask for a table. The AI can't modify the Word document so it creates a new document in the cloud. It then allows me access the document through a link. Presumably I am supposed to go there, copy the table and put it in my Word document myself. Who designed this ? This is so obviously a low-effort implementation that I am baffled. It is almost as if they wanted to fail. Why can't Microsoft see that having direct access to Microsoft Word is an incredible edge that they could leverage to embed the AI directly? It is almost comical.

English
75
148
1.4K
282.1K
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
Paulo Simoes
Paulo Simoes@pasimoes·
This week, after 20+ years at @Oracle, I met with my former senior director and her "executioner" assistant (said from HR) to receive my Easter egg—at least it wasn't an email. I was eliminated as part of a major MAD reduction-in-force #OracleMadRIF It's not easy to close a chapter that lasted two decades of deep dedication — but I should look ahead. I bring years of experience, strong relationships, and a drive to keep building. I'm open to new opportunities and ready for what's next. #OracleRIF
English
40
19
300
51.4K
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
JavaOne
JavaOne@JavaOne·
Our JavaOne playlist is now available! Head on over to our YouTube channel and subscribe to stay up to date as we continue to add keynotes, technical sessions, and hands-on labs for your viewing pleasure: social.ora.cl/6013B6lme3
JavaOne tweet media
English
0
7
25
2.5K
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
Latest in space
Latest in space@latestinspace·
#NEWS 🚨: Artemis II crew experienced issues with Outlook this morning and had to ask ground crew for assistance "We have two Microsoft Outlooks and neither one is working"
Latest in space tweet mediaLatest in space tweet media
English
668
2K
24.1K
2.8M
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
Hedgie
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets·
🦔 Oracle laid off between 20,000 and 30,000 employees Tuesday morning, roughly 18% of its global workforce, via a single email sent at 6am EST with no prior warning. System access was revoked almost immediately after. The cuts are expected to free up $8-10 billion in cash flow. Oracle's stock has lost more than half its value since September 2025 and the company now carries over $124 billion in debt, up from $89 billion a year ago, with free cash flow running negative $10 billion last quarter. My Take Oracle posted a 95% jump in net income last quarter and still eliminated 18% of its workforce by email before most people finished their morning coffee. This is not a company in distress in the traditional sense. It's a company that made an enormous debt-funded bet on AI infrastructure and is now converting its workforce into cash flow to service that debt. We've covered Oracle's AI gamble for months. The $300 billion OpenAI deal through Stargate, $50 billion in capital expenditure this fiscal year, over $124 billion in total debt. Multiple US banks have pulled back from financing Oracle-linked data center projects. Bondholders have sued Oracle claiming it concealed how much additional debt the OpenAI deal would require. The credit default swap spread hit a three-year high earlier this year, meaning debt investors are genuinely nervous about getting paid back. The workers who got that 6am email built the products Oracle has monetized for decades. The bet that eliminated their jobs was made by people who were already paid regardless of how it turns out. That is the part of the AI infrastructure race that doesn't show up in the capex announcements. Hedgie🤗
Hedgie tweet media
English
558
3.9K
13K
2.9M
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
Kim Fletcher (She/Her)
Kim Fletcher (She/Her)@kc_fletcher·
This is @DevoxxUK. Join developers, architects & engineers in London for two action-packed conference days this May. Choose from 100+ live sessions from world-class speakers & expert practitioners. Ready to supercharge your future? Register at devox.co.uk today.
English
0
4
9
765
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
U.S. Marines
U.S. Marines@USMC·
Chuck Norris didn't join the Marine Corps...the Marine Corps applied to him. Heaven’s streets have always been guarded by Marines. Today, Chuck Norris reported for duty. We mourn the passing of Chuck Norris, a @usairforce veteran, who also became an honorary Marine in 2007 when awarded the title by then Commandant of the Marine Corps, Gen. James T. Conway. Chuck Norris is one of just over 100 individuals to be awarded the title of Honorary Marine in the entire 250-year history of the Corps. Some missions may require a battalion, but this one just requires an Honorary Marine. #USMCHistory #USMC #SemperFidelis
U.S. Marines tweet mediaU.S. Marines tweet media
English
1.4K
20.4K
126.1K
2.4M
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
Jensen Huang just called out every CEO who’s been firing people “because of AI.” Jim Cramer asked him why companies are laying people off if AI is supposed to make everyone MORE productive. Jensen's answer: "For companies with imagination, you will do more with more. For companies where the leadership is just out of ideas, they have nothing else to do. They have no reason to imagine greater than they are. When they have more capability, they don't do more." Read that again. The man who built the most important tech company on Earth just told you that if your CEO is using AI to cut headcount, it means one thing: They have no imagination. They have no vision for what comes next. They got handed the most powerful tool in human history and their FIRST instinct was to fire people. This is the CEO of NVIDIA. The company whose chips power every AI system on the planet. If anyone on Earth has the right to say "AI replaces workers," it's Jensen Huang. And he said the OPPOSITE. He said every carpenter could become an architect. Every plumber could become an architect. AI elevates capability. It doesn't eliminate it. But here's where it gets really interesting... During the same interview, Jensen revealed something nobody's talking about: He said AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic are seeing their revenues increase by one to two billion dollars a WEEK. And he wishes these companies were public so the world could see what he sees. One to two billion per week. That's a $50 to $100 BILLION annualized run rate. For companies that most people think are burning cash and making nothing. The entire Wall Street narrative that "AI companies aren't profitable" might be completely wrong. Jensen sees their numbers. He sees their compute orders. He sees their growth. And he's saying the revenue is real. So if the money IS real, why are other companies firing people? Because they're not building AI products. They're not creating new revenue streams. They're not using AI to expand into new markets. They're using AI as an EXCUSE to cut costs because they ran out of ideas 3 years ago and need something to tell the board. Jensen's company added $500 billion in new orders in 5 months. He expects $1 trillion in cumulative revenue through 2027 from just two product lines. That number doesn't include the new chips, systems, or partnerships announced this week. And he's not cutting people. He's hiring. Because when you have imagination, more capability means MORE opportunity. Not less headcount. Meanwhile Salesforce cut thousands. Meta cut thousands. Amazon cut thousands. All blaming "AI efficiency." Jensen's response: You're out of imagination. He also said something that stuck with me. Cramer asked if he ever thought he'd build a $10 to $20 trillion company while waiting tables at Denny's. His answer: "I was just trying to make it through the shift." Biggest tip he ever got? Two, three dollars. Now he's building tech that increased computing demand by one million times in two years. He announced OpenClaw, which he says is as big as ChatGPT. And he's got 21 months of new business that isn't even counted in the trillion dollar figure yet. When asked how long he plans to keep working? "I'm hoping to die on the job. And I'm not hoping to die anytime soon." This is a man who believes every single thing he's building. And his message to every CEO using AI to justify layoffs is simple... You're not innovating. You're surrendering. The technology wasn't built to shrink companies. It was built to make them limitless. If your leadership can't see that, the problem isn't AI. It's THEM.
English
475
1.6K
7.7K
1.4M
Mark⚡️Heckler 🤖🛩️ retweetledi
Mathematica
Mathematica@mathemetica·
Ever wonder how we measured electrical resistance before the invention of the modern multimeter? This 19th-century mechanical calculator was the gold standard for telegraph and early power line engineers. Known as a wire gauge resistance meter, it utilized the direct relationship between a wire's diameter and its ability to conduct current. The device features a logarithmic-style scale where each notch corresponds to a specific wire thickness. By finding the perfect fit, the user could instantly read the ohms per foot. It’s a brilliant example of how physical design can solve complex mathematical problems without needing a single battery.
English
28
241
1.2K
71K