nia banks

UPDATE ON THE DNA ISSUE So after two days of crying, family meetings,and deliberations She has agreed to do the DNA test. BUT. She added her own condition. She said if the DNA proves the baby is his the wedding is cancelled. Yes. Cancelled. Her exact words? “If you need scientific evidence to trust me before marriage, then you don’t trust me enough to be my husband.” Now tell me why everywhere has gone quiet. Introduction done. Wedding date fixed. Vendors fully booked. Deposits paid. People have bought fabric. Tailors have started sewing. Hall almost paid in full. Now everybody is staring at each other. His family that was whispering “a man must be sure” are suddenly saying, “Let’s not overreact.” Her family? They said if the result comes out positive and he still expects marriage, they will personally escort her out of it. Now the man is confused. Because what he thought would give him “peace of mind” might cost him his wife. And here’s the real gag If the DNA shows the baby is his and she walks away, some people will say she’s overreacting. If she stays, people will say she has no self-respect. If she refused the test entirely, they’d say she’s hiding something. So which one is it? Is asking for DNA before marriage wisdom? Or is agreeing to marry someone who doesn’t trust you foolishness? Because now the wedding is on pause Let’s really talk. What would YOU do if you were her? Are her reasons valid??