Ola

Weird how some people always target open-source in AI! First it was: “Open-source AI will destroy the world” (spoiler: it didn't and it won't) Now: “Open-source is a cybersecurity threat because of AI” Both narratives are far too simplistic. The truth is that the exact same risks exist in closed-source systems, often even more so. For example, in practice, APIs can create much bigger data and security vulnerabilities than open systems you can inspect, self-host, and secure yourself. And as with software more broadly, open-source often ends up more secure because it benefits from far more scrutiny than private internal systems. The reality is not “open vs closed.” The reality is that AI is raising cybersecurity stakes across the board, and we need to tackle that seriously together.

Last week, the United States refused to participate in the UN’s review of the Global Compact on Migration. The United States objects to the Global Compact on Migration and UN efforts to facilitate replacement migration to the United States and our Western allies.

The builders asked, the government delivered. For years we’ve pushed for better employee stock options, from startups all the way to Ericsson. This is about real competitiveness and fairness: the Ericsson engineer in Kista should share in the upside, just like the early startup team. Simplifying visas and renewals for top foreign talent is another big win we’ve been asking for. Bravo. Let’s make Sweden really rich again. Raise the wave for everyone!