Paperpile

6.2K posts

Paperpile banner
Paperpile

Paperpile

@paperpile

It's like Gmail for your papers - a modern reference manager. We love papers and tweet about publishing, academic productivity and everything related.

Cambridge, MA Katılım Nisan 2010
3.8K Takip Edilen17.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
Coming soon: Paperpile’s first AI-native integration ✨️ Send papers from your library straight to NotebookLM, ChatGPT, or your preferred AI assistant.
English
2
6
31
3.5K
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
Strict reproducible pipelines that always run from raw data can slow down analysis and break over time. 📊 A more practical approach is to save the final processed dataset before plotting, which speeds up iteration and makes results easier to access in the future, via Claus Wilke blog.genesmindsmachines.com/p/creating-rep…
English
0
0
1
307
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
Filler transitions, em dashes on every line, self-answered rhetorical questions...all classic tells of AI writing. A Claude skill can remove these patterns, which is especially useful for paperwork like budget justifications you’d rather not write in the first place, via @strnr blog.stephenturner.us/p/deslop
English
0
1
1
367
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
AI is pushing computational biology into analytic abundance. The bottleneck is no longer generating results: It’s deciding whether to trust them. 📊 5 habits for sense-checking outputs, via @arjunrajlab
English
1
0
2
399
Paperpile retweetledi
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
Coming soon: Paperpile’s first AI-native integration ✨️ Send papers from your library straight to NotebookLM, ChatGPT, or your preferred AI assistant.
English
2
6
31
3.5K
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
@Faheem_uh Glad to hear that 🙂 That’s what we’re aiming for—making research a bit easier.
English
0
0
1
30
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
@M_Torasawa This looks great! Thank you for recommending us 😊
English
0
0
0
103
Masahiro TORASAWA, MD. PhD.
Masahiro TORASAWA, MD. PhD.@M_Torasawa·
📄Still storing papers as PDFs and leaving them untouched? 📚Practical workflow: #Paperpile (PDFs) → Google Drive → #Docling → Markdown → #Obsidian 📦 Docling: an open-source tool that turns PDFs into AI-friendly Markdown github.com/docling-projec… ✅ Now your entire paper library has become an AI-searchable knowledge base. 🔓What this unlocks: 🔍 Compare Methods across multiple papers instantly 💻 Ask AI to implement a paper’s pipeline in Python/R 🏷️ Search the whole library with auto-generated tags from abstracts 🧠 Turn years of papers into something AI can actually use 🤔Why Markdown instead of PDF? PDFs are great for humans. Markdown is better for AI. It’s easier to search, parse, cross-reference, and reuse. 💻 Fully local 💸 Free 🚫 No API cost Your paper collection stops being a static archive and becomes a research knowledge base you can query instantly.
Masahiro TORASAWA, MD. PhD. tweet media
English
1
2
30
2.2K
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
AI is making it easier to analyze and stress-test scientific work at scale, which could improve rigor and reproducibility. But there’s a risk: more data and better predictions don’t necessarily lead to paradigm shifts. The challenge ahead is not just building more powerful AI, but designing systems and scientific environments that support genuine breakthroughs, not just better predictions, via @adjajadikerta @AsimovPress asimov.press/p/ai-science
English
0
1
4
346
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
@hmap01337406 Thank you for reporting. Can you try restarting your browser? If that fails, please contact our support team at support@paperpile.com and they will be happy to help you.
English
1
0
0
40
Paperpile retweetledi
Greg Jordan
Greg Jordan@gjuggler·
Fascinating work on LLMS and writing. My guiding principles have been: (1) Use AI to help read, not write; (2) Re-evaluate this stance often, as models improve quickly. But I am curious why LLMs are still "bad" writers! Even today's best models still have an AI smell.
Natasha Jaques@natashajaques

The paper I’ve been most obsessed with lately is finally out: nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news…! Check out this beautiful plot: it shows how much LLMs distort human writing when making edits, compared to how humans would revise the same content. We take a dataset of human-written essays from 2021, before the release of ChatGPT. We compare how people revise draft v1 -> v2 given expert feedback, with how an LLM revises the same v1 given the same feedback. This enables a counterfactual comparison: how much does the LLM alter the essay compared to what the human was originally intending to write? We find LLMs consistently induce massive distortions, even changing the actual meaning and conclusions argued for.

English
0
1
0
566
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
2/2 But it also risks pushing science toward “checklist” thinking, where easily measurable robustness is prioritized over judgment, creativity, and meaningful questions, via Jessica Hullman jessicahullman.substack.com/p/living-the-m…
English
0
0
0
123
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
AI is making it easy to run large-scale robustness checks like multiverse analyses on research papers, potentially transforming peer review and scientific scrutiny. This could make it harder for fragile results to be published. 1/2
English
1
0
0
365
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
An analysis of submissions to bioRxiv shows steady growth in the number of scientists uploading their work. In 2025, more than 4,000 papers are posted each month, alongside millions of views and downloads, via @Nature nature.com/articles/d4158…
English
0
0
0
313
Paperpile
Paperpile@paperpile·
Compiling research datasets from scattered reports can take months of manual work. When the same task was attempted with an AI agent, it produced results quickly, but missed many cases and data sources. 1/2
English
1
0
3
541