EH

Okay, wow. By accusing us of “fake news” with „Man City bidding“ (never reported) you’ve unfortunately crossed a line. I never wanted to bring this up, but your Klopp report was simply ridiculous and disrespectful to every journalist who actually does proper reporting. One day after the DFB had already named him in its official statement, you posted a “here we go”. Posting a signing soon and it’s almost one week later. I honestly thought you’d have the decency not to do that. Anyone could have posted that Klopp HWG because it was obvious he was going to become Germany’s head coach. Your report was based on probability, not on actual agreements. As long as you keep deleting false „here we go’s“ and posting results minutes before the final whistle just because of algorithms and the need to be first in the race against 433 and score apps, only to delete them five minutes later because Neymar scores, you should probably keep a lower sound overall. The same applies when you fail to credit the original source in a large share of your Instagram posts. Do your business. We’ll do ours. But accusing others of spreading lies is quite ironic coming from someone in your position. Good night.

Chelsea don't need a golden era to stay relevant. You'll hear people talk about "Prime Manchester United." Have you ever heard anyone say "Prime Chelsea"? Exactly. Our success has never been tied to one generation, one manager, or one period in time. We've been collecting trophies across different eras for decades. That's the difference. Manutd are defined by their history. Chelsea are defined by a culture. Peace.