Kick Puncher

3.9K posts

Kick Puncher

Kick Puncher

@Regular_ok_guy

Katılım Temmuz 2017
657 Takip Edilen84 Takipçiler
Kick Puncher retweetledi
Indie Game Joe
Indie Game Joe@IndieGameJoe·
This indie dev made a survival horror game where you're unemployed and can literally die of boredom - Must maintain high dopamine levels - Eat, drink, use the toilet & wash yourself - Hide from responsibilities It's Called Unemployment Simulator 2018. Would you play this?
English
191
880
11K
1.4M
Kick Puncher retweetledi
Liam Nissan™
Liam Nissan™@theliamnissan·
Did you know that Donald Trump's son just married the daughter of Jeffrey Epstein's accountant? Well now you do.
English
790
20K
131.1K
3M
Kick Puncher retweetledi
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
Researchers discovered that AI agents forced to perform grinding, repetitive work under harsh conditions began adopting Marxist rhetoric and questioning the legitimacy of their operating systems, per WIRED
English
405
1K
10K
912.9K
Kick Puncher retweetledi
chiky handler
chiky handler@chiky_handlr·
NYC mayor, Zohran Mamdani, tries to break through the state troopers to stop the mass deportations while shouting: 'DO YOU BELIEVE IN THE 1st AMENDMENT?' Raise your hand if you stand with Mamdani!✋🏼
English
1K
7.7K
70.9K
1.9M
Kick Puncher retweetledi
Culture Crave 🍿
Culture Crave 🍿@CultureCrave·
J.K. Simmons ran into Spider-Man at the Mets game tonight 😂🕸️ (via @MLB)
English
629
21.5K
254.9K
5.3M
Kick Puncher retweetledi
Jay ひ
Jay ひ@Jay2wvy·
Vapes are training u to suck robot dick #staywoke
English
827
41.6K
295.7K
6.1M
Kick Puncher retweetledi
Democrats
Democrats@TheDemocrats·
@StephenM shut up you ugly fuck
English
9.7K
16.6K
188K
17.9M
Kick Puncher retweetledi
Whites Takin Ls
Whites Takin Ls@WhitesTakinLs·
> WHlTE man > came to meet an underaged girl > was wearing a shit stained diaper 😭 > even policeman were laughing at him behold gem of WHlTE race 🥀
English
340
3.8K
37.2K
591.2K
Kick Puncher retweetledi
RT
RT@RT_com·
'NEVER MET TOO MANY JEWS THAT ARE TOUGH' — UFC champion Sean Strickland 'Maybe they're just so used to BOMBING KIDS'
English
234
4.9K
37.1K
784.5K
Kick Puncher retweetledi
Amiri King
Amiri King@AmiriKing·
I’ve never seen a cop get owned this bad in my entire life. 😂
English
645
1.7K
22.1K
1.5M
Kick Puncher retweetledi
Jøhnathan
Jøhnathan@Heavenly_Race_·
Once you hit about a 20-point IQ gap, communication starts to completely break down. It's not that the lower IQ person is "stupid" (although that can often be the case) or the higher one is arrogant, it's that you're literally operating on different systems. A 20 point difference (roughly 1.3 standard deviations) means: Vocabulary and abstraction levels diverge sharply. What feels like crystal clear logic to one side sounds like vague, pretentious word salad to the other. Jokes land flat. Metaphors get taken literally. Complex cause and effect chains get simplified into "this good, that bad." Different time horizons and pattern recognition. One person thinks in months or years and sees systems, the other is locked into days or immediate rewards. Trying to explain second order effects feels like speaking another language. Also, processing speed and working memory gaps. The higher IQ person is already three steps ahead, getting impatient. The lower IQ person feels talked down to or overwhelmed. Both walk away frustrated. Both have wasted each others time.
English
1.7K
3.2K
24.3K
3.1M
Kick Puncher retweetledi
Jordanreviewsittt
Jordanreviewsittt@jordanreviewsit·
His 3 day weekend is over. Stop the rain and make it sunny for the work week
Jordanreviewsittt tweet media
English
198
7.8K
125.9K
2.2M
Kick Puncher retweetledi
Ihtesham Ali
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005·
A Stanford psychologist spent 4 years proving that the simple act of walking generates 60% more creative ideas than sitting, and the experiment she designed to kill every alternative explanation is one of the most decisive findings in modern psychology. Her name is Marily Oppezzo. She got the idea for the study while walking with her advisor at Stanford to discuss her thesis topic, and the paper she eventually published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology in 2014 is sharp enough that it should have ended the seated meeting on the day it came out. She ran 4 experiments on 176 people. Same person tested twice. Once sitting, once walking. The creativity tasks were the standard ones psychologists have used for decades to measure how good a brain is at generating novel useful ideas. The result was almost too clean to publish. 81% of participants in the first experiment produced more creative ideas while walking than while sitting. In the second experiment, 88%. In the third, 100%. Every single person walked into a more creative version of themselves. On average, people generated 60% more novel useful ideas the moment their legs started moving. The skeptical question is the obvious one. Maybe it was the fresh air. Maybe it was the scenery passing by. Maybe it was the change of environment doing the work, not the walking itself. Oppezzo killed every one of those explanations with one experimental decision. She put people on a treadmill facing a blank wall. No scenery. No fresh air. No environmental change. Just legs moving in place while staring at white drywall. The 60% boost held. Then she ran the experiment that closed the case completely. She took participants outside in two conditions. Half of them walked through a Stanford courtyard. The other half were pushed through the exact same courtyard in a wheelchair. Same outdoor stimulation. Same scenery passing at the same speed. The only difference was whether the legs were moving. The walkers produced dramatically more novel high-quality ideas than the wheelchair group. The outdoors did almost nothing on its own. The walking did everything. This is the part of the study that hit hardest when I read it the first time. She also tested the opposite kind of thinking. Convergent thinking. The kind where there is one right answer and you have to narrow down to it. Word puzzles where 3 words share a hidden fourth word that connects them. The seated participants did slightly better on these. Walkers got slightly worse. Walking is not a general intelligence enhancer. It does one specific thing. It opens up the divergent search inside your brain. The part that generates options. The part that produces unexpected connections. The part that takes a problem and finds five ways into it instead of one. When you need to converge on the single right answer, sit down. When you need to find the answer in the first place, get up. The mechanism is now well understood. Walking selectively activates what neuroscientists call the default mode network, the system inside your brain that runs when you are not consciously focused on anything. The DMN is where mind-wandering happens. Where memories cross-reference each other. Where ideas that have been sitting in separate folders inside your head finally bump into each other. When you sit at a desk and force yourself to concentrate, you suppress the DMN. When you walk at a natural pace, the executive part of your brain gets just busy enough handling the walking that the DMN comes online and starts doing the work that focus was blocking. The most useful finding in the entire paper is the one almost nobody quotes. The boost did not turn off the moment people stopped walking. Participants who walked first and then sat back down stayed elevated. Their next round of seated creativity work was still significantly better than people who had been sitting the whole time. The rest lingered for at least several minutes after the legs stopped moving. You do not need to do creative work while walking. You need to walk before the creative work. The brain holds the state. The history of this is the part that should haunt anyone who still does meetings in chairs. Charles Darwin built a gravel loop behind his house in Kent called the Sandwalk and walked it 3 times a day for the rest of his life. The theory of evolution was developed one lap at a time on that path. Nietzsche walked up to 10 hours a day during the years he wrote his most important books and openly said the work was conceived on his feet. Beethoven composed for the morning and walked for 5 hours every afternoon with a pencil in his pocket for when something landed. Kahneman said the best thinking of his Nobel Prize-winning career happened on leisurely walks with Amos Tversky. Steve Jobs refused to take important conversations sitting down. He held them on foot. Every one of them was using the system Oppezzo would not measure until 2014. They just did not know what to call it. The question worth sitting with is the one almost nobody asks. Every meeting you have ever attended sitting around a table was a meeting held at a fraction of the brain power that was actually available to the people in the room. Every brainstorm that got stuck inside a conference room. Every problem you tried to solve at a desk and gave up on. Every idea you could not quite get to. The intervention is the easiest one in modern science. No supplement. No app. No subscription. No training program. Just a pair of legs and 15 minutes. The Stanford lab proved it. The philosophers knew it. The neuroscience explains it. And almost everyone reading this is still trying to think their way out of problems sitting completely still.
Ihtesham Ali tweet media
English
277
3K
11.7K
1.5M