Flux I Decentralized Cloud

The internet's infrastructure is controlled by three companies. When they go down, everything goes down. When they change pricing, you pay more. When they receive a court order, your app goes offline. We built an alternative.

The application is fully compatible with Bitwarden clients, Vaultwarden supports secure sharing and file attachments, all within a self-hosted environment. Deploy via the Marketplace and access your vault securely through your own HTTPS domain: cloud.runonflux.com/marketplace/va…

NEW APP ALERT🔥🔥🔥🔥 Vaultwarden is now live on FluxCloud. Run your own decentralized password manager with full control, privacy, and end-to-end encryption across all your devices. You can also deploy with an optional admin token, create your account, and connect your apps.

Deploy in minutes via the Marketplace and choose from 2, 4, or 10 slot server configurations for your crew: Pay with fiat or FLUX and get 5% off with FLUX. Raise your flag and take control of the seas on Flux. cloud.runonflux.com/marketplace/ga…

NEW GAME ALERT 🔥🔥🔥 Windrose is now live on FluxCloud. Sail the Caribbean, command your ship, and live the pirate life on your own decentralized server built for combat and exploration. Engage in naval combat and face both historical pirates and supernatural threats.

AI isn’t expensive because of what you see. It’s expensive because of what you don’t. The real cost isn’t the model, it’s the data cleanup, hidden infrastructure, and constant maintenance nobody talks about. Most teams learn this too late, we broke it down in our latest article:

I want to know: did you deploy anything on FluxCloud the past one month? Did you set up or upgrade a FluxNode? Did you migrate off AWS, even partially? Did something we covered change a decision your team was making? Or are you still in the evaluation phase? All answers are useful.

7,500+ nodes across 67 countries is early-mover infrastructure. Deploy with Git adoption is the developer experience moment. The future of the internet is not being decided in a boardroom. It's being decided by 7,500+ people running nodes and thousands of developers pushing to GitHub.

AWS's dominance of cloud was determined in 2012–2015, when enterprises made infrastructure choices that created lock-in that still persists. The choices organisations make now: which infrastructure to build on, which networks to operate, will define the next consolidation.

For businesses in the growth phase, this matters most. Your infrastructure cost should track your compute usage, not your user acquisition success.

That's not a sustainable model for businesses operating at thin margins. Especially when the scaling costs are partially driven by things outside your control. FluxCloud: zero egress fees. Bandwidth included in all plans. Your cost structure is compute and storage.

AWS designed their pricing to scale with your success. They call it pay-as-you-go. The more users you have, the more you pay, in compute, in egress, in API calls, in everything. They've monetised your growth.

Infrastructure users: deploying apps on FluxCloud, using Deploy with Git, building on the network. Infrastructure owners: running FluxNodes, earning block rewards every 30 seconds. Both matter. Which one are you?

When you deploy on FluxCloud, your app draws from this pool of independently operated compute. You're not sharing a server with strangers. You're not on a cloud company's rack. You're running on infrastructure that 7,500+ people built and maintain and that earns those people block rewards every time your app runs.

56,400 CPU cores. 187TB of RAM. 3.1PB of SSD storage. All on the Flux network. All available to developers deploying on FluxCloud. All owned by independent operators, not a corporation.

What would you build differently if you knew the infrastructure could not be turned off? 👇runonflux.com/fluxcloud

The network that can't be turned off. There is no off switch for the Flux network. No CEO with a kill switch. No government order that reaches all 67 countries simultaneously. No data center failure that takes down all 7,500+ nodes at once.

Are you currently on shared hosting? Drop what you're running and your monthly cost, let's do the comparison live.

FluxCloud: your app runs on 3+ independent nodes by default. Your performance isn't affected by other apps on the same server because there is no shared server. Pricing: free for one app (Basic plan). $0.99/month for additional apps. Zero egress fees. Redundancy included by default. For small businesses: this is the economics of shared hosting with the resilience of enterprise cloud.

Everyone compares FluxCloud to AWS. Nobody compares it to shared hosting. For small businesses and indie developers, this is the more relevant comparison. (A thread) 🧵