GenderGapOnWikipedia

"I suggest that you pack up your ovaries and go away." @SaidOnWP ow.ly/M937P

"A suggestion for attracting and keeping female editors" #A_suggestion_for_attracting_and_keeping_female_editors" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti… @SaidOnWP

"do not harass young editors [saying] they are inherently immature; ..old editors [as]... past it; ... male editors" #saidonWP

And again: “The problem is that if one type of harassment is mentioned, all the others have to be mentioned as well” #saidonWP

"If sexual harassment is mentioned, others will want their favorite harassment target mentioned" (en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti…) #saidonWP

“No, nothing extra is needed."

Identify sexual harassment as something users may suffer on #Wikipedia?

3 months of grants focused on the gender gap: "is a negative signal to all..." (lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wiki…)

"The Dutch #Wikipedia has a severe gap with only 6% female participation." (lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wiki…)

The #GenderGap on #Wikipedia is NOT because of a failure of women to engage, BOTH genders need to play a role in fixing it

"...what we can do... to encourage male editors... to be more pro-active..." en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti…

Said of this: "Is it fair to ask women for their unpaid labour (on #Wikipedia) in exchange for the kind of treatment we've seen...?"

"Women can't end sexism in the workplace just by showing up" theguardian.com/commentisfree/… by @JessicaValenti.

"I never ever abuse women. In our culture women are compared with dogs." More collegial discussions on #Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti…)

How to Edit #Wikipedia: Lessons from a Female Contributor ow.ly/HfzAq Great tips (and warnings) #diversity

@wikisignpost: will 2015 be any different?

@wikisignpost: many users complained in 2014 about your coverage of females and "gentlemen's club" feel to several issues.

Unwarranted optimism? #wikisignpost section title for first 2015 edition? "Kock Up" (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia…) Readership? 3000+ weekly

With more attention than ever before, here's hoping for a bumper 2015 & real progress on #Wikipedia