Steve Kirsch

29.7K posts

Steve Kirsch banner
Steve Kirsch

Steve Kirsch

@stkirsch

Investigative journalist. Authored over 1,800 articles on vaccine safety on my Substack. Former high tech serial entrepreneur. Founder, VSRF.

Los Altos Hills, CA Katılım Mayıs 2009
727 Takip Edilen632.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
If you need to contact me about anything (interview request, fact check request, ask a question, let me know about something, want to debate me, found an error, etc), here's how to contact me: stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-to-conta…
English
1.7K
1.2K
5.8K
3M
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
ACIP Members, Malone and Levi, Respond to Judicial Decree. Here we learn that ACIP members were told by the CDC what they could NOT talk about at the meetings. youtu.be/N-Hhs7gtsLw?si… via @YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1
9
17
2.9K
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
Grok evaluation of KCOR: "KCOR itself is a valid epidemiological method with no known flaws at this point. Full stop." Sadly, some people simply don't like to face the fact that Grok is repeatedly unable find an error in the method or the implementation. Every time it thinks it does, I point out its mistakes, and it agrees I was right. Every single time. Here is the latest merry-go-round with Grok: grok.com/c/34ff3107-575… and it's final conclusion:
Steve Kirsch tweet media
English
5
4
20
1.9K
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
so exactly how many times do I have to show once again that Grok is wrong? An infinite number of times? Right? Every single time we do this I get Grok to admit it was wrong. Then it comes back with the same arguments I already showed were flawed. So we go in circles. How many times do I have to show it is wrong again? Give me a number. 10 times? 100 times? 1000 times?
English
0
0
0
17
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
Grok praises my new KCOR v7 approach as a major breakthrough in how to analyze COVID vaccine mortality risk/benefit. Full convo here: grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…. If you think you have a better method for analyzing this data that Grok validates as better, please post it here. I'll wait.
Steve Kirsch tweet media
English
9
22
91
9.7K
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
Grok said "KCOR itself is a valid epidemiological method with no known flaws at this point." that was in response to YOUR takedown request after I pointed out its errors. grok.com/c/34ff3107-575… You interpret that as "it still sucks." I'm baffled by your interpretation of "valid epidemiological method with no known flaws at this point." Does it suck because you and Grok are unable to point to any flaws in the method? Is that the problem?
English
0
0
0
3
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
@dninio Please tell me how many times we have to keep doing this. Grok again validated KCOR and said the other studies it relied on were unreliable. grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt… how many times do we have to repeat this?
English
0
0
0
6
Steve Kirsch retweetledi
Daniel Ninio
Daniel Ninio@dninio·
@stkirsch Doing Math good ≠ epidemiologically sound Grok still thinks KCOR sucks
English
1
0
1
17
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
the real question is how many times do I have to point out that Grok makes lots of mistakes and when pointed out, agrees with me on the math, the method, and that it is proper epidemiology. But YOU are never satisfied until you get the answer YOU want, right? x.com/stkirsch/statu…
English
0
0
1
15
Daniel Ninio
Daniel Ninio@dninio·
@stkirsch The real question is how many times do I have to demonstrate a neutral AI’s assessment of KCOR as crappy does Steve need before he admits he’s wrong? 100 times ? 1000 times ? 1M times ? x.com/i/grok/share/f…
English
1
0
2
53
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
Grok AGAIN praises KCOR and finds no errors in the paper, the rebuttal to critics, or the code. NO ERRORS FOUND. The only question is how many times i have to do this before my critics (who rely on Grok) believe it. 10 times? 100 times? 1000 times? 1M times? grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…
English
9
9
51
7.4K
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
@henjin256 i'm sure there are lots of effects going on here. it's hard to pinpoint the cause.
English
2
0
0
16
henjin
henjin@henjin256·
@stkirsch In both the Czech Republic and the United States, the percentage of COVID deaths in ages below 60 is the highest in 2021, and in 2022 the percentage is already lower because young unvaccinated people have acquired natural immunity.
henjin tweet media
English
2
0
0
24
Bless thine heart, but...
Bless thine heart, but...@LlamaOfGod6w50·
The "KCOR v7" and "mirror-image test" were hallucinations synthesized because the system over-indexed on Authority Bias—it invented technical nomenclature to make the counter-argument appear more lethal. The actual subject is the NZ Whistleblower Data, and the real dismantling by Jeffrey Morris relies on the Healthy Vaccinee Effect (HVE). This effect creates a spurious "mirror" because those actively dying are never vaccinated, meaning the jabbed cohort is "selected" for survival until the background mortality rate of the age-stratified group catches up.
English
1
0
0
12
Daniel Ninio
Daniel Ninio@DrDaniel832·
@stkirsch If you produce a sound analysis that qualified epidemiologists think is reasonable then we should interpret your findings in the context of everyone else's data
English
1
0
0
4
Steve Kirsch retweetledi
A Midwestern Doctor
A Midwestern Doctor@MidwesternDoc·
Did you know if you already had HPV its vaccine made you more likely to get cervical cancer? Before COVID, Gardasil was the worst vaccine unleashed upon America—so CDC covered up its issues to sell more shots. Here I reveal all the data they hid from us midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hpv-vacc…
English
70
1.3K
2.5K
72.4K
Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch@stkirsch·
@henjin256 Because at that point, the frail people have died off, and the cohorts are more comparable in terms of frailty. The term for it is depletion of susceptibles. Have you ever heard of it?
English
1
0
0
28
henjin
henjin@henjin256·
@stkirsch If "NPH" (in your bastardized sense) explains why unvaccinated people have much higher COVID mortality than vaccinated people, then why does the ratio between unvaccinated and vaccinated COVID mortality drop dramatically after unvaccinated people acquire natural immunity?
henjin tweet media
English
1
0
1
52