Colin Wright

American soccer star Megan Rapinoe owes her entire career to the existence of a protected female category. Now she’s criticizing the IOC for protecting that category for the next generation of women and girls. My latest for the @nypost. nypost.com/2026/04/08/opi…

@SpaceWoot @NSTA They will constantly change the terminology they use for the same handful of extremely stupid ideas they have and want to inflict on society.

Insane. Gender Identity has less to do with science than Horoscopes. Also, I see they are rebranding "assigned at birth" to "designated at birth". Their crack team of woke marketers decided that sounds more sciency, while retaining the idea of sex being an arbitrary decision by some birthing doctor.🫪

🚨ALERT: The National Science Teaching Association (@NSTA) has created a "Gender Identity Inclusive Pedigree Chart for High School Biology" to "respect students whose gender identity does not correspond with their designated sex at birth" when teaching about genetic inheritance. They claim that "science teachers have an...obligation to acknowledge and respect their bisexiual, transsexual, and intersex students" by using this new chart. The document further states: "The left side of each symbol allows traditional tracking of genetic inheritance and the right side reflects individual genetic identities. By using an inclusive pedigree chart when teaching genetic inheritance, science teachers can serve to better support gender identity equality in their classes and schools." There is no evidence for a genetic basis of various "gender identities" Do you think high school kids will want to be a boring brown square or circle when there are 10 other much more interesting identity shapes they can identify as? This is gender cult indoctrination.

This new academic paper claims to reveal the “lived experiences of cross-dressing practice teachers” in the Philippines and does so with a very serious-sounding “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) guided by queer theory in education.” In practice, that means the authors interviewed a small group of cross-dressing teachers and then sorted the results into themes like “Embodied Authenticity and Identity Recognition,” “Institutional Constraints, Surveillance, and Emotional Burden,” and “Coping, Advocacy, and Relational Resilience.” Stripped of woke jargon meant to make it sound rigorous, this is a paper about student teachers wanting to cross-dress and behave unprofessionally in front of their pupils, feeling distressed when school policies get in the way of that, and then reinterpreting those feelings through queer theory as evidence that schools need “inclusive policies” and “equitable participation.”

Hey guys another @cl_delirium music drop! With art by @RichRagsdale animated by @CageClaypool fir @ATORecords “Some people think humans are just biological machines," says Sean Ono Lennon of the new song. "They think free will is a hallucination & we’re destined to be replaced by robots. Not only are they happy about this, but they’re actively trying to make it happen as fast as possible. Some of us think we still have a choice. We think there’s something special about living, breathing & feeling. We believe we can shape our own destiny, because we know we are more than just Meat Machines."  youtu.be/ISd5whqq8kQ?si… Please share and RT!

Welcome home Reid, Victor, Christina, and Jeremy! 🫶 The Artemis II astronauts have splashed down at 8:07pm ET (0007 UTC April 11), bringing their historic 10-day mission around the Moon to an end.

No men allowed in parts of this USC gym, unless they subjectively identify as "non-binary." That will surely solve the creepy gym dude problem.

This academic book chapter asks an unbelievable question: universities adopted rules against professor-student relationships to protect students from coercive power imbalances, “but should queer professor–student relationships be subject to the same scrutiny?” It looks at cases where “queer female professors were accused of sexual harassment by graduate students” and then sympathetically reviews arguments against such rules, including that they “disregard students’ consent,” “advance anti-queer and erotophobic agendas,” “require and reinforce fictions of female vulnerability,” and even “perpetuate neoliberal ideologies.” The author concludes that if there is ANY problem at all with queer professor–student relationships, it's supposedly “not exclusively or even primarily sexual” but “pedagogical.” Instead of simply saying professors should not sleep with their students, this chapter attempts to reframe the issue when the professor identifies as “queer.” Basically, everything is excused if you're “queer.”

🚨NEW: This person just got a PhD for a dissertation illuminating the “lived experiences” of just FOUR “queer child life specialists” through what it calls a “queer narrative inquiry study.” The student used “an unstructured group interview to co-create research questions with participants,” meaning the subjects of the study helped decide what the study would ask in the first place. It then followed up with “unstructured individual interviews” and analyzed the material using a “creative approach to thematic analysis.” Participants' feelings were sorted into themes like “ongoing navigation of queer identity,” “experiences of discrimination,” and “experiences of allyship.” A final “member-checking group interview validated the findings,” which means the same four people helped confirm the conclusions too. You must refer to this person as “Doctor” now.

@BernardBut30910 Yup.

@SwipeWright Absolutely right. This is going to be a long term slugfest.

If you think "it's over," just wait. If a Democrat wins the presidency in 2028, the censorship industrial complex will come back so fast you'll get whiplash. The woke haven't been defeated. They're laying low while they build up their armies in Mordor.

@novak57152 It can get way worse.

@SwipeWright Like it isnt already here

@brunette350 That's the reality.

@SwipeWright we shouldn't have to take on Morder, Saruman, and Gollum all at the same time, with 100 wormtongues everywhere.

@SilkerBen Yup!

@SwipeWright Which is why conservatives and Christians need to build new digital and physical infrastructure frikn yesterday.

@iwrotesham Absolutely. They are in preparation. Which is how they could all spring into action the moment George Floyd happened.

@SwipeWright Just finished researching a long piece about DEI in med schools...and though they're on the run now, you can feel them lurking, lurking, regrouping...

@TheOnlyFronk Yeah, we don't have to look far. Canada is a crystal ball for how bad things can get.

If you want to know what it looks like, check out Canada. We didnt manage to get rid of the far left woke globalists, and they are literally destroying us. I just payed $10 for 150g of sliced roast beef at the deli, enough for 1 good sub. Thats a random example, but the price of everything is insane like that proportionally to what it should cost.

@SpaceWoot 💯

@SwipeWright one hundy

@redheadranting I fear the GOP is going to lose badly in the midterms and in 2028. But a lot can change from now until then!

@SwipeWright This is why they cannot win. I wish the GOP would meet this challenge, but I fear they will not.

@itsdesign Yes, I think that's true.

@SwipeWright Yes. Social media censorship will be back as soon as governments are elected that enable it. And you won't know what you don't know.

@iwrotesham They know they need to be quiet about wokeness right now to get the centrist voters in the midterms and in 2028.

@SwipeWright 💯 Makes no sense for them to force some of these issues right now because the right has the high ground and air superiority. But if all three branches go left?! All bets are off.

@nogenderpredtrs @Quietdespairing It's true!

@SwipeWright @Quietdespairing “They’re laying low while they build up their armies in Mordor.” 🤣🤣🤣 Perfect! 🤣

@peterrhague I believe they would have gone on a censorship frenzy.

@SwipeWright They will also collude with the Labour government, who hoped Harris would win in 2024 to bypass the First Amendment by enforcing OFCOM decisions in the US

Since I started writing about sex pseudoscience, critics dismiss my arguments because I mainly published in popular news outlets instead of academic journals. Well, my scholarly article "Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes" published last year is now the most-read academic article on the subject. Only one scholar has written a formal critique of it, but from a "feminist epistemology" perspective. It was laughably nonsensical. I responded (link below). I am still waiting for a biologist who thinks I'm wrong to expose and embarrass me with formal, detailed take-down of my arguments. If I'm nothing more than an anti-trans bigot promoting "junk science," as the SPLC has claimed, publicly demolishing my supposedly crank views should be seen as a public service. And it should also be an easy way to add to your academic résumé. LINKS (all open access): -My paper "Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes":link.springer.com/article/10.100… -A critic's "feminist epistemology" response:link.springer.com/article/10.100… -My response to the critique:link.springer.com/article/10.100…