Paul D. Thacker

"SICK LIES" New York Post goes after Fauci for his lies about dangerous virus research at the Wuhan institute of Virology. It's only going to get worse for these liars. (friend sent me this photo from a NY bodega.)

Exactly.

Crispest explanation for science communities defense of the market spillover: "If true this is very bad for all of virology research."

@tomselliott They're coming for you next, Tom.

It's a long article, so I had to post it elsewhere: tomselliott.substack.com/p/after-the-ep…

I've done the thing. I've spent the last 2 months researching the Epstein Files, specifically regarding the circumstances of his reported suicide. And now I believe the Epstein Files effectively prove Jeffrey Epstein did not kill himself.

The defence editor at @TheEconomist admits the 'beheaded babies' story he promoted, and which was widely used to justify Israel's atrocities against Palestine, was fraudulent. Are our journalist class just credulous little babies, or do they lie to order for Israel? #ItWasAScam

Laura Loomer is a despicable person.

Once, I asked a virologist at a national lab in Japan, "As an expert, you must have noticed the sequence looked engineered." He replied, "After the sequence was published, our colleagues were all upset, suspecting a lab leak. But we had to stay silent because of a gag order."

The number of journalists who only cared about censorship after Trump was sworn in who will report on this is exactly 0.

@JenniferSey @xx_xyathletics This suspension is so crazy.

It’s our 2nd birthday at @xx_xyathletics. I woke up Friday to find we were suspended from advertising on Meta. All for standing up for fair competition for women. Be our media. Share this video. Use code 2Years for 20% off today only.

🇺🇸🇬🇧 Trump posts a vieo about Starmer using a sketch that mocks the PM.

🚨🚨 We previously exposed the PubPeer “PubSmear” Network Mob's signature tactic: 'Working in coordination with fellow network members, they employ the mob’s signature tactic of the ‘PARTIAL TRUTH’ —selectively highlighting fragments of information to construct PUBPEER (aka ‘PUBSMEAR’) dossiers against the scientists they target. Along the way, many additional researchers become collateral damage, serving to conceal the network’s primary targets.' ⚠️ And their central distortion: 'Their central tactic is to falsely equate the number of PubPeer entries with the number of fraudulent papers upon which their harassment, smearing, and defamation campaigns stand — a deliberate distortion designed to mislead the academic community, media, and institutions.' 📌Now Nobel Laureate Thomas C. Südhof confirms the real damage in his Lindau 2025 lecture: 'The cost to especially junior scientists has been enormous... Does it matter if a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it?' Every scientist, researcher, and postgraduate student needs to know about this scandal. What we’ve exposed is only the tip of the iceberg. Watch our 9-min bombshell + @NobelPrize Laureate @Stanford Professor Thomas C. Südhof's Lindau 2025 lecture segment below 👇 Watch it. Spread it. Far more is coming. Stay tuned. @SciGuardians 🔱

I'm telling you. There are some real nuts out there with advanced degrees. No joke.

Would love to know who inside the US government is playing these games.

Oh, boy. Can't wait to wake up tomorrow and see Trump's response on Truth Social.

@hkakeya $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Of note, while many virologists admit the strong possibility of a lab origin of COVID-19 in candid conversations, those in the gain-of-function research camp continue to deny it in Japan as well. Money talks.

FYI: Two of the idiots who lashed out at actual experts are David Gorski & Gavin "Yammer" Yamey. Never forget these two frauds cosplayed at evidence-based experts.

What did Kristian Andersen say that we're not supposed to hear?

Kristian Andersen promoting Bluesky post by Peter Daszak. Matt Ridley really riled up the frauds hanging out on Bluesky.

@chimoose @basilahmed2023 British elite, center-left consensus thinking.

@basilahmed2023 @thackerpd What kind of bias do you attribute to the economist? Asking sincerely.

The issue isn’t that The Economist is biased; that’s a given. The issue is that it has convinced so many it is serious, authoritative journalism (through glossy design and the performance of British intellectualism that has no existence) when it is just another unremarkable paper

@Tyler_A_Harper Once you deny being racist, you are def 100% racist. Them's the rules for online discourse.

Aham in particular is a riot. When he gets criticism after the book comes out he and West suddenly starts using they/them to refer to him in a transparently cynical bid to shame readers out of criticizing a non-binary, and when that didn’t work he pivots to “I support Palestine!”

My Lindy West take was that West was a victim of political manipulation (do poly or you’re basically a slaveholder) and it’s super funny seeing Aham now try that tactic on the public: how dare you reactive negatively to me demeaning a female journalist via email, I support Gaza!

Old enough to remember when public health "experts" were rushing to call everyone a murderer for pointing to science that found lockdowns would be harmful. And legacy media reporters religiously regurgitated these "experts'" falsehoods.