WalletScrutiny

@em @Bitkey Yes, we found that. Check @dannybuntu 's full review here: walletscrutiny.com/hardware/bitke…

@WalletScrutiny @Bitkey really? i'm pretty sure github.com/proto-at-block… here it is or not?

We went eagerly to work to analyze this fancy new version of the @Bitkey. Sadly our verdict is "no source" as the firmware *cannot be build from the source provided* as one *closed source dependency* is not included in their source code.

That said, the issue could potentially be remedied with a software update. 🤞

@standard_sats @dannybuntu Valet? Is it on Google Play? I only see FDroid and GitHub. One of our relevance metrics is to have 1000 downloads and the repository we track is Google Play.

@WalletScrutiny @dannybuntu Please, review ours. x.com/i/status/20486…

Now this looks more promising than their version 1 which required the user to blindly sign transactions. walletscrutiny.com/hardware/block… @dannybuntu see if we can review this already, please.

It's not live yet. It still needs @btc_remnant 's blessing but the we've been asked for this a lot ;)

We check bitcoin wallets for transparency but you might care about features so soon you will be able to filter by features.

If your wallet does this, neither Monero nor Zcash can save you. - Locks you to a spying node. Hence the ability to select your own node is a must for a private wallet. - Peeks at your balances and activity behind your back. - Knows your real name or physical address (e.g. via KYC) - Stores your public view keys on its servers. The only reliable way to know it doesn’t do this is to use a verifiably open-source wallet >> refer to @WalletScrutiny

@BitcoinWalletz You testing this is relatively new. Maybe we should mark tested wallets accordingly? Do you keep a list?

@WalletScrutiny Importing the 24-word seed phrase into Electrum generated addresses that matched.

Google Play app id: io.leather.mobilewallet Review for @WalletScrutiny

x.com/i/status/20018… In case you wondered, we are working on telling our visitors which are the wallets he's talking about. A wallet dev doesn't hear "dependencies". He hears "attack surface" or "liability".

WalletScrutiny turned 6! We've come a long way over the years. In the beginning, we only looked into Android wallets - 40 of them - and now we've grown to more than 6000 products across many platforms. Your favorite hardware wallet? We got you covered. Desktop? Probably, too.

@2ToneShawn @KeystoneWallet @KeystoneForBTC Always worth looking on here @WalletScrutiny walletscrutiny.com 😃

@SparrowWallet hi, i'm checking for reproducibility right now for @WalletScrutiny and noticed a very minor issue, these legal documents are not appearing in the build. Strange.

If you prefer Knots better than Core, @WalletScrutiny also have their binaries tested to be reproducible from sources: walletscrutiny.com/desktop/bitcoi…

@nunchuk_io v1.71.2 was released a few days ago. In just a few hours, the first reviewer tested that the build was reproducible. Before installing a new wallet or updating yours, don't forget to check @WalletScrutiny walletscrutiny.com/android/io.nun…

🚀 A @walletscrutiny invitation to @bluewalletio 💙 We’re working with fellow Bitcoin Android devs (Nunchuk, BitBanana, Bitkey) on “Acceptable Diffs”. Some diffs explained ✅ but it’s an ongoing collab. BlueWallet team — would love your input! 🙌 #issuecomment-3238852240" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/BlueWallet/Blu…

@dannybuntu @unstoppablebyhs @WalletScrutiny Thanks. @WalletScrutiny is underrated.

🚀 Successfully reproduced and verified Electrum desktop v4.6.1 (windows) from source! ✅ The binary tested matches the one built from source. 🔍 See the full verification here: @WalletScrutiny #verificationId=a4bfef0a390b24d57948955dcae117d11b9e2bca11cdae8b3f819464faff53c8" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">walletscrutiny.com/desktop/electr…

🔍 Reproducibility Verified ✅ @BitBananaApp v0.9.7 (Android) has been successfully verified as functionally reproducible! 🛠️ Built from source using the official GitHub repository 📱 All differences found were acceptable metadata variations from Google Play 🔒 Core application logic remains identical #verificationId=0b1f71826d9f4c2cb2860d021f824b3efb32f2de840d045c3254fec1a96323fb" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">walletscrutiny.com/android/app.mi… #ReproducibleBuilds @WalletScrutiny #BitBanana

You're not a toxic bitcoin maximalist if you haven't built Bitcoin Core from source! Upon the request of one of the followers of @WalletScrutiny, I included 'easier' build instructions to verify the reproducibility of bitcoin core v29.0 Anyone can do this! Try it! #verificationId=7713fefda390b3b3856618672a76b349f7b9c3643c6c393f4f32539183f4efaf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">walletscrutiny.com/verifier/?pubk…