Sabitlenmiş Tweet
yearn
4.8K posts
yearn
@yearnfi
vision https://t.co/A8fnPpojOe - docs https://t.co/HaUkJiVkL9 - discord https://t.co/A8mg4EfSIH
Katılım Şubat 2020
4 Takip Edilen207.2K Takipçiler
Deposit to yvUSD and take advantage of all the advanced strategies here:
yearn.fi/vaults/1/0x696…
English
yearn retweetledi
Anyone can chase yield, but very few understand it.
@omgcorn, Growth at @yearnfi and @yAuditDAO, joins us April 10th at 3 PM UTC
🔹How Yearn is navigating today’s yield landscape
🔸What it takes to generate consistent returns
Will you be there?: x.com/i/spaces/1AxRn…
English
yearn retweetledi
yearn retweetledi
Fun fact yearn has done a version of this for a very long time when integrating new protocols.
It is part of our reports we are making public at curation.yearn.fi
There’s some good nuggets in there CT hasn’t figured out yet for those willing to look
Keone Hon@keoneHD
Admin Audit: a new kind of audit that only audits protocols from the perspective of multisig configuration, presence of timelocks on dangerous functions, use of cold devices for signing, multisig signing procedure, etc. Smart contract audits tend to focus on contract logic while treating admin roles as trusted. They might flag suboptimal configurations, but ultimately the pass/fail is based on presence of logic bugs. An Admin Audit would be the exact opposite - only focused on asking the question "what happens if multisig members get compromised" and "does the team follow best practices that substantially reduce the odds of compromise". Protocols would need to get both a smart contract audit and an admin audit - users would demand both. The admin audit would be substantially cheaper than the smart contract audit since the best practice is well-defined and issues are obvious, whereas smart contract audits are looking for needles in haystacks. Ecosystem foundations could subsidize these - for example, if a reputable firm offered these, we at the Monad Foundation would be happy to subsidize. Admin audits would capture a lot of the low-hanging fruit. Realistically, many of the huge hacks in the history of DeFi have been admin compromise rather than logical bugs. If you are building this, please reach out.
English
Epic chess at today's Yearnament! Prizes were awarded to the top 3, but there were croissants for all. Thanks to everyone that came out and made this a great event.
If you couldn't make this one, We will be hosting another chess tournament at @ethprague. Don't miss it!
English
yearn retweetledi
Appreciate your choice my friend! Yes, we will add them; btw regarding $YFI do they have meaningful claimable cashflows?
With all due respect to Defillama, their data on $AERO $CRV $YB token holders cashflows is incorrect and need to be updated.
The issue of such platform is that they cover a lot of stuff, while such metrics require a deep dive and some labor to properly build and verify
English
yearn retweetledi
Yearn chose simplicity over 4 year token locks too.
@yearnfinance replaced veYFI with stYFI, a staking model that routes 90% of protocol revenue directly to token holders. Rewards paid in yvUSDC, currently earning 30.34% APR. You are paid in a yield-bearing token, which is also growing at a 3.74% APY rate.
The old system was elegant on paper. Lock YFI, earn governance weight, direct incentives through gauges. The problem was that almost nobody did it.
Other teams have also recently moved away from this model, including @PancakeSwap and @pendle_fi, transitioning to simpler and more participation-friendly designs.
The new model is direct:
> Stake YFI (now sitting around $100 million market cap) → receive stYFI
> With stYFI you retain voting rights. If you want to delegate them, you need to convert your YFI into stYFIx
> Earn 90% of protocol fees in yvUSDC
> Exit with a 14-day cooldown instead of years
I personally would not lock an asset for 4 years. And I think a lot of the communities built around those mechanics end up resembling religions more than investment strategies (even though I love those protocols).
What makes this more credible than most reward models is that @yearnfi 's revenue does not depend on market conditions.
Automated vaults simplify dispersed yield opportunities across an expanding number of networks. That demand does not disappear in a bear market and retail (or even corporate treasuries) will always need that abstraction layer.
Do you think revenue-backed simplicity beats engineered complexity every time?
corn🛸@omgcorn
English
yearn retweetledi
Deposit GRO, Borrow USDC. @BirchHill_io @yearnfi @Morpho and @GromaCorp are bringing collateralized real world asset lending to a blockchain near you!
x.com/sethpriebatsch…
Seth Priebatsch@sethpriebatsch
English
For those of you at ETHCC:
Chess Yearnment starts 10 AM on April 2. Signup link below:
luma.com/jpcdtq5u
English
yearn retweetledi
One vault on mainnet, yield from every chain.
@yearnfi just introduced yvUSD, a cross-chain vault that takes USDC deposits on mainnet and deploys capital across multiple chains.
Strategies bridge capital via Circle's CCTP (burn on one chain, mint on the other) so there aren't wrapped assets sitting in third-party bridge contracts.
What users get:
> Single entry-point and a standard ERC-4626 share
> Diversified yield across chains
> Optional Locked yvUSD: 14-day cooldown + 5-day withdrawal window for boosted yield
As I said, yvUSD is an ERC-4626 token so it is composable. That means shares can be used as collateral on lending platforms while still accruing yield.
The lock mechanism exists because cross-chain capital cannot always be recalled instantly. Since this capital stays locked, it can also be used in different strategies, which is why it will earn higher returns.
I've always preferred picking my own strategies via @ConvexFinance or @StakeDAOHQ but I also know Yearn has been doing real DeFi for years, obsessively and their due diligence process is probably more rigorous than mine.
yvUSD reflects what we actually need: simple, profitable, and secure DeFi. Another step toward broader mainstream adoption.
yearn@yearnfi
English