Denise Rowe

acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc… The Straw Man in the New Round of Reading Wars, by Racheal Gabriel

MUST READ: "The sloppy, mudslinging nature of these debates has led to confusion, distrust and a tribe-like affiliation with single approaches among practitioners, researchers and policymakers." Dr. Rachael Gabriel acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc…

Retweeting for those who missed it. Important read on the truth about 3-cueing (spoiler alert: it doesn’t exist). Please read🤓

Getting History Right: The Tale of Three-Cueing Jeffery L. Williams readingrecovery.org/wp-content/upl…

In today’s blog, a long-time teacher educator, Susan Vincent, discusses how what is being said in the current “reset” of SOR thinking dovetails perfectly with things Marie Clay said decades ago. Her interview gives me hope that we may yet find common ground by using common sense and listening to one another. Please have a look. doctorsam7.blog/2024/09/21/sus…

Thanks to Dr. Sam and Susan Vincent for this stellar look at the science behind Reading Recovery. doctorsam7.blog/2024/09/21/sus… #readingrecoveryworks

I wrote a blog about some recent chatter in the SOR world. Hope you’ll take a minute and read it!

Anyone else listening to Seidenberg speak at the Accelerate Literacy summit?? Everyone should be. He is calling for dialing back Science of Reading as it’s currently being implemented. He’s making the same points so MANY of us have made. Point after point.

"The ugliest of ironies is that reading reform driven by the 'science of reading' (SOR) story fails the evidence test, notably that SOR legislation is not based on science." radicalscholarship.com/2024/05/25/ign…

Not investigative journalism @Tom_Newkirk

"Much of the misunderstanding surrounding the 'science' of reading is related to a lack of understanding of science and the scientific process." - Dr. Andy Johnson @axe_andrew youtube.com/watch?v=4TsDc0…

"Most of us teachers... the people in the trenches... know the Science of Reading is the same BLEEP, different day." @bustedpencils BustED Pencils LIVE takes on the Science of Reading scam. twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1…

Recommended: The Broken Logic of "Sold a Story": A Personal Response to "The Science of Reading," Tom Newkirk radicalscholarship.com/2024/05/14/rec… via @plthomasEdD

The Broken Logic of "Sold a Story" "In a masterpiece of branding, Hanford and others call their approach "The Science of Reading," not so subtly implying that it is an unquestioned consensus among researchers, beyond dispute. That is not the case." ow.ly/5kC850RG0lR

I will add my call to the many others who have posted this article: If you are a literacy educator, you need to read this, as you navigate the Science of Reading and state legislation. Not a hard read. Please read it: Resources | Literacy Research Commons literacyresearchcommons.org/resources/

This is a very important book that pushes back on what was said in @ehanford 's Sold a Story. Please review ALL the evidence before making up your mind. literacyresearchcommons.org/resources/

This has been a wonderful partnership. I’m extremely grateful for the generosity of our donor to make this collaboration possible. @OSULitCollab inspire.ehe.osu.edu/2024/04/03/don…

“We don’t expect politicians to tell doctors exactly what to prescribe for every patient, and politicians reaching into every classroom and telling every teacher how to teach every child undermines the professionalism of teachers.”

@PamelaSnow2 Yes, this is why in Reading Recovery writing is a daily activity & Ts learn that letter learning is more than just linking letters to sound. Always fascinating to see those who bash RR promote the very practices that RR used to help children on their path to becoming literate.

@FaithBorkowsky @BoksnerJudy As Ehri shared in her work that there are different ways to solve/decode. You know it from memory, use knowledge of the writing system, use analogy, and “use initial letter plus context clues.. to anticipate what the word might be.” She goes on about orthographic mapping. (Cont)