George Gammon

16.4K posts

George Gammon banner
George Gammon

George Gammon

@GeorgeGammon

Macro Addict | Investor| Libertarian...I try to help people increase their wealth/freedom. 700k+ subs on Youtube. Media requests: [email protected]

Curently Traveling Katılım Şubat 2011
84 Takip Edilen329.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
George Gammon
George Gammon@GeorgeGammon·
HUGE ANNOUNCEMENT: Starting a new Youtube channel next week exclusively for macro/money/freedom interviews. Rebel Capitalist Interviews To see next weeks shows subscribe to the channel here👇 @RebelCapitalistInterviews" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@RebelCapitali
English
96
86
576
357.8K
George Gammon
George Gammon@GeorgeGammon·
Got this email from Google last night about Gemini Basically, like many warned, spending $100 per month per user who pays you $20 a month isn’t a viable model When I pointed this out in the past the response was always “compute costs will come down so fast it won’t matter”
George Gammon tweet media
English
24
14
128
17.2K
George Gammon
George Gammon@GeorgeGammon·
@SantiagoAuFund Because what this person is describing doesn’t impact the supply of broad money so it’s not “money debasement”
English
3
0
5
3.4K
Santiago Capital
Santiago Capital@SantiagoAuFund·
This is not what Weimar did...
Lee Roach@leevalueroach

The mechanism by which the United States government finances itself in 2026 is, when you actually trace the flow of money, an accounting magic trick so brazen that it should, in any honest country, be a national scandal, and the only reason it is not is that 99% of the population has never been taught how it works, and the 1% who have been taught have been carefully trained to use language that obscures rather than reveals what is actually happening. The trick goes like this. Congress authorizes spending it does not have. The Treasury issues bonds to fund the spending. The primary dealer banks, who are required by their charter to buy these bonds at auction, take them onto their balance sheets. The Federal Reserve, which is a private banking cartel wearing a government uniform, then buys those same bonds from the primary dealers in the secondary market, paying for them with dollars that did not exist before the Fed pressed a button to create them. The Fed now holds the bonds. The Treasury pays interest on the bonds to the Fed. The Fed, at the end of the year, remits its "profits," which is to say, the interest it just collected from the Treasury, back to the Treasury. The loop closes. The government has, in a precise structural sense, just spent money by printing it, while every official statement, every press release, every PhD economist on cable television insists that this is not what is happening, that the Fed is independent, that the dollar is sound, and that anyone questioning the arrangement is a crank, a conspiracy theorist, or a goldbug. Every single currency that has ever run this trick at scale, across the entire 4,000 year recorded history of monetary debasement, has eventually been destroyed by it. Weimar Germany ran the trick and produced a wheelbarrow currency in 1923. Argentina has run the trick four separate times and produced four separate currency collapses. Zimbabwe ran the trick and produced trillion-dollar notes that became wallpaper. Venezuela ran the trick and produced the largest peacetime collapse of a middle-class society in modern history. Turkey is running the trick right now, in real time, in front of the entire world, and the lira has lost 85% of its value against the dollar in five years while the official rhetoric continues to insist that everything is fine. The United States is not exempt from monetary physics. The United States has run the trick longer and more successfully than any country before it, only because the dollar has a unique structural advantage as the global reserve currency, an advantage that is, in 2026, eroding faster than at any point since 1971. The gold price is telling you what the economists will not. Gold has gone from $1,200 in 2015 to north of $4,000 in 2026, and the people who tell you this is irrelevant are the same people who told you, in every previous monetary regime change in history, that the price action in gold was an artifact, a speculation, a temporary distortion, and they have been wrong every single time, in every single country, in every single decade since the discipline of monetary economics was invented. Gold is not an asset class. Gold is a referendum on the currency, and the currency is, by every honest measure, in the late stages of a multi-decade debasement that the official statistics have been carefully designed to obscure. You do not need to predict the timing of the breakdown. You need to recognize that the loop, as currently constructed, cannot continue indefinitely, and that the people who position themselves on the right side of the eventual repricing, in real assets, in productive businesses, in commodities, in fixed-rate long-duration debt against hard collateral, and in the one monetary metal that has functioned as money continuously for 5,000 years, will be the ones who exit the regime change with their wealth intact, while the people who continued to hold the currency, the bonds denominated in the currency, and the cash savings calibrated to a 2% inflation target that exists only in government press releases, will be, in due time, the ones explaining to their grandchildren what it was like to live through the slow-motion default of the world's reserve currency. The math is the math. The history is the history. The trick has never worked forever. It will not work forever this time. The only question that matters is which side of the trade you are on when the loop finally breaks, and the answer to that question is being decided, right now, by the asset allocation choices you are making, or refusing to make, in the years that remain before the rest of the world figures out what a tiny minority of people, holding gold and real assets in 2026, already understand.

English
12
2
80
32.7K
George Gammon retweetledi
JP Sears
JP Sears@AwakenWithJP·
Is there anyone worse than Thomas Massie? Faults: 1. Obstructionist: He obstructs protection for the Epstein Class. 2. Backstabber: He stands for the same principles he has for years when Trump does a 180. 3. Traitor: He accepts $0 funding from Israel. Very disloyal to America.
English
798
4.4K
29.1K
1M
George Gammon
George Gammon@GeorgeGammon·
You’ve got to admit, you can actually tell who they are haha
English
12
3
90
8.8K
George Gammon
George Gammon@GeorgeGammon·
New Whiteboard Vid!! 🔥 The panic is spreading like wildfire…for good reason MORE Private Credit Funds Are Collapsing...Are The Banks Next? youtu.be/Jo7r7vIqJLo?si… via @YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
English
10
12
89
22.5K
George Gammon
George Gammon@GeorgeGammon·
IOW, I think one of the main reasons Trump went into Venezuela and Iran was more leverage in other “deals” Cuba as an example Trump was likely over confident in Iran bc of his success with Maduro And thought why not invade, claim victory and use that as leverage in other deals So he assumed same success in Iran and then he goes to the table with almost any country and says do what I ask or your the next Maduro or the next Iran Even if he doesn’t explicitly say that it’s implied Again, the prob with that approach is you’re risking WW3 vs losing some money Its a similar game but the stakes are different, therefore in my view, require a different approach.
English
34
4
104
15.2K
George Gammon
George Gammon@GeorgeGammon·
The benefit to being a bull in a china shop is it gives you substantial leverage in other negotiations bc of your unpredictability And in biz the downside is you lose money or worst case file bankruptcy The problem with this approach as president is the downside is WW3
George Gammon tweet media
English
21
7
186
19.5K
George Gammon
George Gammon@GeorgeGammon·
@LukeGromen How would you explain yields having such a high correlations to nominal GDP, and most often an inverse correlation to debt/deficits?
George Gammon tweet media
English
3
2
13
4K
Luke Gromen
Luke Gromen@LukeGromen·
@GeorgeGammon Disagree strongly. Treasury & Agency holdings by all US commercial banks below showed that banks turned sellers when rates rose in 2022, rather than buyers 👇 And when credit defaults occur with higher rates + higher oil + AI, banks may have to sell USTs to raise loss reserves
Luke Gromen tweet media
English
18
14
201
15.4K
Luke Gromen
Luke Gromen@LukeGromen·
If their GDP drops 14%, do you think Qatar and Kuwait will: a) Slash government outlays (thereby risking domestic unrest), or; b) Sell USTs & US equities “until their hands bleed” to raise USDs to buy needed goods to try to maintain domestic order? Bet on “b”.
Annmarie Hordern@annmarie

Goldman Sachs on the Gulf: Qatar and Kuwait could each see their GDP contract by 14% this year should the conflict continue through April, resulting in a two-month halt of the Strait of Hormuz. Saudi Arabia and the UAE would fare better given their ability to re-route oil flows away from critical Hormuz waterway, but would still likely see GDP drop by about 3% and 5%. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

English
118
399
3.2K
549.2K