GoFakeYourselfMeghan

I stand corrected. I thought the clock in the Christening photo was photoshopped, but it looks exactly the same in the original photo. That said, it does look like Camilla's beer was removed -- to my eye, anyway. Getty should have disclosed that.🤷‍♀️

Awww. 🥹📸

@memesbyky If she gets him, I hope she hides him under her collar in front of Harry's racist family. We still don't know which royal questioned Archie's blackness. 😭

Ah, yes, I recall that. Personally, I understood that comment as something a new parent that's had a child longer than 4 weeks might say. IOW, it's something they would know after seeing such changes more than once? But maybe that's just me. 🤷‍♀️

@GoFakeYourselfM When asked about the baby’s features, he said something about how much they change in two…, we thought it was maybe 2 weeks, now it’s 2 months? But the previous book said the couple introduced a shawl. I still think ti’s one of those Preborn Dolls.

Hold up. This says that Chris Allerton photographed newborn 'Archie' & QEII, at Windsor Castle, on May 8, 2019. But, Chris Allerton also photographed 2-month old 'Archie', at Windsor Castle, on May 8, 2019, according to the exif-data embedded in the photo. Anyone know how long people have to wait to obtain a parental order, in the UK, when using a surrogate? 💅

@JanetMargaretA3 You have to be very careful to hold up their heads or else they get creepy AF. 😂

@GoFakeYourselfM 🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂oh no, i have been so well behaved this year after spending most of last year in the naughty corner . You girls will be getting me cemented there 😂🤣😂🤣i find those reborn dolls extremely creepy . I would not want the owners on my client list 🥴🤐

Harry & Meghan have YET to build the basketball court they promised while in Abuja Nothing says “humanitarian” like making empty promises and using less fortunate people for photo opportunities to exploit

@MeghansMole MeMe would never!

@EyesWideShut996 Ha! I think those are screenshots taken from my blog post about this, back in the day. gofakeyourselfmeghan.wordpress.com/2019/07/22/arc…

@GingerNinjas5 @Christi62204082 Yes, I know. I said in another reply that I asked the photographer, Chris Allerton, if he could explain the date anamoly. His assistant assured me he would get back to me, but he did not. Take that for what you will.

@GoFakeYourselfM @Christi62204082 Unfortunately it depends if it was set correctly on the camera . Is it actually the same camera body? Is it a RAW image or a JPEG resaved in Photoshop?

🤣🤣🤣🤣

@kind_zizie I think most of the attendees may have witnessed a 4 month old being Christened. He probably looked a bit small to them when the photo was released and they deliberately put it out of their minds. Speculation, ofc.

@GoFakeYourselfM Christening pics taken months before the ceremony?

@Monarch71897881 *direct line...'male' doesn't apply anymore.

I think they obtained a superinjunction and that takes care of the UK press...and possibly news outlets that reach a UK audience, IDK...hmm. IIRC, in the UK, doctors/hospitals/etc can neither confirm nor deny patient info. I could be mistaken though, it's been a long time since I looked at a lot of this stuff. Personally, I suspect it doesn't rise to the level of 'criminal' unless/until taxpayers are expected to fund security for the invisikids and/or they somehow tragically got into the direct male line. There could be a few NDAs and some may have just turned their heads the other way. *ahem* RF members, I am looking at you. That said, you may be thinking of a specific crime that's not occurred to me. If so, feel free to share. I'm American and can't claim to have exhaustively considered all scenarios. I do see a possible civil challenge to the invisikids' purported places in the LOS. That would drag everything into the sunlight. Ironically, I think Andrew, of all people, may have the most standing to challenge the invisikids purported royal descent. He is next in the LOS *LIST* posted on the Royal Family website. BTW, the list is informal & has no legal weight. Parliament decides the Line of Succession AND I hope taxpayers would demand they confirm royal descent if it were ever an issue that one of the invisikids became heir apparent. People shouldn't stress about it, imo. Also, the reigning monarch, at the time of their births, confirmed she and the Royal Family only received 'the news' that MeMe was delivered of a son. That's hearsay and she was aware of it when she approved the wording. No royal medical staff attended the birth -- no medical staff, at all, attested to Archie's birth facts. Official "Royal Communications" didn't even confirm royal descent although they were willing to state Archie is Dorito's grandchild. 😂 I feel like ppl have been careful to avoid criminal acts, all around. It's, like, it's all a bunch of BS that is meant to confirm royal descent....without confirming royal descent. kwim?

@kind_zizie @MeghansMole

@GoFakeYourselfM @MeghansMole Justice Warby sounds familiar. Oh! He was the judge for the M Harkle letter to dear daddy case! They are all connected. 🤦🏻‍♀️

@Christi62204082 It was taken in the UK by a UK photog and I believe it's GMT, IIRC. I could be misremembering the time zone and I can't go check it ATM.

@GoFakeYourselfM Genuine question is the date/time on the christening photo in US style where day/month are different to the UK? So it could be 5th August?

@noliesplease8 * Ugg. I always forget to link to the comparison photo of the mantel clock. I picked it up from the royal collection website. This is a link directly to the high resolution photo: col.rct.uk/sites/default/…

@GoFakeYourselfM and at 10.56 pm that night?

@zx81chic @GoFakeYourseIfM @MeghansMole I thought I followed. Derp...I am following now. 🥴

@GoFakeYourseIfM @GoFakeYourselfM @MeghansMole 🤗 I followed so my request is probably in your pending 😅

My personal theory is that Archie is 6-8 weeks older than they claim and Harry obtained a parental order under the 'cover' of the Nottingham Cottage photos/Splash lawsuit. The Splash lawsuit completely came out of nowhere on May 16, 2019. It was settled the same day the media learned of it! The very next day, on May 17, 2019, Archie's birth was registered. There was another party to that lawsuit who was unnamed, 'anr'. I think the court might make accommodations to protect an infant's privacy interests if the Harkles had an arrangement with Splash to provide cover in case Harry was seen at court. MeMe has icky relationships with Splash and Backgrid and other photogs. ____ But the bottom line is: We have never seen evidence of Archie's birth facts/identity, period. So, it's perfectly fair to conclude he doesn't exist, too.

Darren did have adorable feet though..😍

It could be. The Christening photo looks like a composite of at least two photos and one was taken using artificial lighting. The lighting on the Harkles, especially, is struggling to appear like natural lighting, to my eye. I am not a photographer, however, but I am a graphic designer. I also wonder if Allerton accidentally provided Getty with a draft of the photo composite rather than the final image. There are some eyebrow raising problems I would have thought he would catch. The clock is the most obvious, but there is also a mysterious floating pink pearl between Charles and Dorito. Looks like something inadvertantly left on a layer in Photoshop. FTR, I reached out to Chris Allerton for an explanation about the date anamoly. I was assured he would get back to me by his assistant. He never did. Take that however you wish, but I take it that he has no explanation or doesn't want to offer one.

That's the conclusion I came to when trying to figure out what 'anr' represented on the the docket. People have speculated about a parent or child company, but I've seen no evidence of who it represents. Leading up to the birth, the UK Megxiters said the Harkles would have to obtain a parental order in court, and they couldn't do that until 6 weeks minimum. Then, on May 16, there's a *sudden* civil lawsuit reported. The very next day, Archie's birth certificate was made public having been registered that day. Given the totality of the circumstances, *AHEM* and the photograph below...I've concluded the Splash lawsuit was a ruse to obtain a parental order to protect 'Archie's' privacy. New evidence could persuade me otherwise though. alamy.com/the-duchess-of…

Weird. "& anr" is a standard abbreviation used in UK court documents (and some other common law jurisdictions). It stands for "and another." In legal case titles, it means the claim involves the named party (here, Splash News and Picture Agency Ltd) plus at least one other defendant (or sometimes claimant, depending on context), without listing the name of or the name of others.