Jonathan Ford

9.6K posts

Jonathan Ford banner
Jonathan Ford

Jonathan Ford

@Grepsul

Media maven. Likes trouble, cycling and regional crime drama. Doing @altifpodcast & also Business Adventures Substack https://t.co/AGud9IfmPf

London Katılım Temmuz 2010
573 Takip Edilen3.7K Takipçiler
Jonathan Ford
Jonathan Ford@Grepsul·
@tunkuv I agree. If any of those players play for English clubs they should have their contracts cancelled and be removed as undesirable elements whose presence is not conducive to the general good
English
0
0
0
272
Tunku  Varadarajan
Much as I dislike the BCCI, the English FA needs to study the former's exclusion of Pakistani cricketers from all Indian domestic professional leagues to see whether it might exclude (forever) at least those Argentinian players who held up a 'Malvinas' banner at Atlanta. There is absolutely no obligation to permit such people to play in your own league. They can play elsewhere. Excluding all Argentine players would be wrong (that is the BCCI way). But the banner-wielders? They should be barred.
English
41
6
74
25.2K
Jonathan Ford
Jonathan Ford@Grepsul·
@JohnRentoul Amazing how many gongs Sir Sadiq now has. OM next I expect. Achievements a little more sparse however
English
0
0
0
120
Jonathan Ford
Jonathan Ford@Grepsul·
@blagden_david Why don't we do this? It mystifies me. I once asked a US non proliferation expert which if any of the NPA nuclear weapons states he thought would ever voluntarily disarm. His answer: only the UK because they don't really believe in hard power. Hmmm.
English
0
0
6
392
David Blagden
David Blagden@blagden_david·
This is true, but also says more about the British govt than the outside world. It’s mainly because they *choose* to worry about multilateral-institutional censure - part of maintaining the fiction that “rules-based liberal order” is a real thing - that such pressure works. 1/2
John Simpson@JohnSimpsonNews

It’s a pity to have to keep spelling it out, but the risk to the Falklands isn’t military action by Argentina, which is impossible. But Britain is increasingly vulnerable to diplomatic pressure, especially now that we’re out of the EU and Trump is in the White House.

English
3
7
90
18.7K
Jonathan Ford
Jonathan Ford@Grepsul·
@cashandcarrots The courts have repeatedly said that net zero obligations don't mean no new roads although it doesn't stop cynical campaigners seeking repeated JRs to raise the cost of projects. And guess what? Maybe the local community might welcome a new road which would improve prosperity
English
1
0
0
7
Michelle
Michelle@cashandcarrots·
@Grepsul They'll have to get permission They'll have to justify it and get buy in from local people. And demonstrate they are going to be compliant with our net zero commitments
English
1
0
0
15
Jonathan Ford
Jonathan Ford@Grepsul·
@cashandcarrots We're not going to agree on this. I think people should be free to build a toll road if they want to. You obviously don't.
English
1
0
0
4
Michelle
Michelle@cashandcarrots·
@Grepsul Ah, so roads based on one's ability to pay... We don't need it, toll or no toll, if we are to meet decarbonisation targets. If they wanted to reopen closed railways and put in freight terminal capacity at either end for "last mile" intermodal, I'm all for it
English
1
0
0
16
Michelle
Michelle@cashandcarrots·
@Grepsul Congestion costs the economy billions. New roads only end up increasing traffic over time. An electric vehicle still poses the same risk to pedestrians from impact as an ICE vehicle. Ah - so you want a toll road?
English
1
0
0
17
Jonathan Ford
Jonathan Ford@Grepsul·
@cashandcarrots Why do we need to reduce traffic demand if we are introducing EVs? Do both I'd say, especially if those won't involve the public purse. If entrepreneurs want to take the risk why shouldn't they?
English
1
0
0
10
Michelle
Michelle@cashandcarrots·
@Grepsul Build the railway then. Again, we need to reduce traffic demand. Traffic from East Midlands can use the A50 across to the M6. Sheffield there's several options. Woodhead was primarily a freight railway. One train can take up to 20 to 30 lorries off the road.
English
1
0
0
85
Jonathan Ford
Jonathan Ford@Grepsul·
@cashandcarrots If you read their plan they are intending to repurpose the old rail tunnels. But we are going to need roads as well, especially if they reduce distances and travel times
English
3
0
0
12
Michelle
Michelle@cashandcarrots·
@Grepsul If they want something useful to tunnel, they can re-bore the original tunnels at Woodhead and get this rail line and the Buxton to Mansfield one re-opened. We need to reduce demand for road use, not increase it.
English
1
0
0
46
Jonathan Ford
Jonathan Ford@Grepsul·
This article in the Times betrays zero understanding of nuclear power or economics. It seems to imply that extending the life of Sizewell B by 20y - a good thing - involves a cost comparable to building Hinkley Point from scratch. Duh?
Jonathan Ford tweet media
English
1
2
8
615
Jonathan Ford
Jonathan Ford@Grepsul·
If Burnham proposes to take Britain on "a new path" as PM (assuming he gets it) he should set out his stall and have an election so the public can have its say.
Jonathan Ford tweet media
English
0
0
1
91
Jonathan Ford
Jonathan Ford@Grepsul·
@EdwardEGibbon @IGMansfield Well I am not going to airbrush the record. I seem to remember that while acknowledging some risks, I thought it was worth a bash. Although scepticism later crept in when I saw vice chancellors pulling down salaries of 500-750k
English
1
0
0
24
Iain Mansfield
Iain Mansfield@IGMansfield·
Universities have presided over a collapse in standards, at every stage of study from admission to awarding. They cannot be trusted to reject those unqualified to succeed. Minimum requirements to access student loans are essential to restore trust in the system.
Iain Mansfield tweet media
English
12
10
69
4.5K