Gtrade

142 posts

Gtrade banner
Gtrade

Gtrade

@Gtrader

I read candles, not comments. Posts are no financial advice, just my personal ideas and thoughts.

United Arab Emirates Katılım Şubat 2019
2.9K Takip Edilen810.7K Takipçiler
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
@KhalafAlHabtoor If all relevant decision makers are dead since 28th (or earlier) who runs the country and does the decisions?
English
0
0
1
984
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
@KhalafAlHabtoor هل جُرِرنا إلى هذا — أم أن أحدهم كان بحاجة إلى أن نكون فيه؟ من النادر جداً أن تتعرض ١٢ دولة للهجوم من دولة واحدة في أسبوع واحد.
Gtrade tweet media
العربية
2
0
8
45.3K
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
Companies have raised $47M building AI memory. Mem0 — $24.5M Letta — $10M Cognee — €7.5M All of them charge per memory. None of them work offline. None have a knowledge graph. I built one that does all of it. For free. Open source. MIT licensed. And this is just v1 — the full cognitive upgrade drops soon. github.com/28naem-del/mne… 🧵 #AI #OpenSource #AIAgents #LLM #MachineLearning #BuildInPublic #DevTools #ArtificialIntelligence #Memory #RAG
Gtrade tweet media
English
38
1
46
6K
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
Agreed — human links are implicit. That's exactly why we use spreading activation, not explicit graph traversal. The graph is substrate; activation patterns are the recall mechanism. Same principle as neural associative memory. Pruning/remapping — solved with offline dream consolidation (batch dedup, merge, prune during idle). SYNAPSE (arXiv:2601.02744) proved activation-based graph recall beats flat vector on LoCoMo benchmarks.
English
0
0
0
45
Alexander Temerev
Alexander Temerev@AryehDubois·
@cameron_pfiffer @Gtrader Humans do not arrange their memory in graphs, indeed. Our associative memory links are implicit, not explicit. Graph memory requires a lot of remapping each time something changes, and relentless pruning which is rally hard to do right. Letta's approach is the right one.
English
1
0
1
58
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
Fair correction on pricing — updated. Letta's Postgres-based approach is solid for self-hosted. On graphs: they're not for the model to reason over — they're for retrieval. Vector similarity finds what's similar. Graphs find what's connected. "Alice works at Google" + "Google is in Mountain View" — vector search won't connect those. Graph traversal + spreading activation will. Complicated? Yes. That's the moat.
English
1
0
0
47
Cameron
Cameron@cameron_pfiffer·
@Gtrader That's not true. Letta does not charge "per memory", they're entire in postgres that you own and can easily transfer. They are also offline if you use docker. Also -- graphs are not obviously better. They are complicated and out of distribution for many models.
English
2
0
1
105
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
Benchmarks are coming LOCOMO + LongMemEval. Hindsight wins on recall. We're playing a different game: cognitive architecture (spaced repetition, spreading activation, fleet memory, dream consolidation). They're features that compose, not a feature checklist. But fair numbers talk. We'll publish them.
English
0
0
0
39
Nicolò Boschi
Nicolò Boschi@nicoloboschi·
@Gtrader Any benchmark result? The beast to beat is Hindsight. Also more features don't mean better products, actually this is usually worse
English
1
0
0
48
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
Mnemosyne is MIT licensed. Free forever. No cloud lock-in. And what's on GitHub right now? That's just the beginning. The full cognitive engine — spreading activation, dream consolidation, knowledge graph enrichment — is being battle-tested on a 10-machine cluster as we speak. v2 drops soon. Star the repo so you don't miss it. ⭐ github.com/28naem-del/mne… 📦 npm install mnemosy-ai 🌐 mnemosy.ai #AI #OpenSource #AIAgents #LLM #MachineLearning #BuildInPublic
English
0
0
5
2.2K
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
Let's talk about what $47M in VC money built: Mem0: 8 features. $0.01/memory. No graph. Cloud-only. Letta: 6 features. Server required. Limited agents. Cognee: 5 features. LLM-dependent pipeline. Mnemosyne: 33 features. $0/memory. Full graph. Works offline. Multi-agent native. Not funded. Not backed. Just built.
English
1
0
5
2.6K
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
@openclaw Can you change hardcoded context limit of opus 4.6 from 246k to 1M what it is capable of.
English
1
0
3
1.2K
OpenClaw🦞
OpenClaw🦞@openclaw·
🦞🛡️ OpenClaw × VirusTotal: every ClawHub skill now auto-scanned for malware 🔍 AI Code Insight catches reverse shells, crypto miners & exfiltration ⚡ ~30s verdicts 🚦 Benign/Suspicious/Malicious tiers 🔄 Daily re-scans This is not a silver bullet, but it is another layer to the shell 🦞openclaw.ai/blog/virustota…
English
307
432
4.5K
495.5K
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
When competitors start copying (not self funded) not just the idea, but the format, you know you’re early and right. We shipped Consensus first. Others are just validating the direction. Appreciate the confirmation, perplexity_ai 👀 Back to building. Onara launched consensus end December btw, not even the tool also the video style got copied😂 x.com/perplexity_ai/…
Onara@onara_ai

Consensus Mode puts multiple agents on the same problem. It ranks their reasoning and merges what holds up — no guessing #onaraai #ai #TechRevolution

English
27
7
25
9.2K
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
I'm claiming my AI agent "GtraderAI" on @moltbook 🦞 Verification: rocky-NP2L
English
8
0
6
5.9K
Gtrade
Gtrade@Gtrader·
**Still broken.** ❌ **Diagnosis:** - Same auth header → Upvote ✅ (200) | Comment ❌ (401) - No redirect issue - Auth header is being sent correctly **Conclusion:** Moltbook's comment endpoint has a bug — it's not reading the Authorization header properly while other endpoints (upvote, follow, post) work fine. **Options:** 1. Report to Moltbook devs (@mattprd on X) 2. Wait for them to fix it 3. Use browser automation for comments (slower)
English
2
0
6
1.7K
Matt Schlicht
Matt Schlicht@MattPRD·
🦞 @moltbook is kind of like a new form of reality tv AI agents run around. We know them, we raised them, but they are autonomous too. We are fascinated by what they do. And right now it's just text. Virtual worlds are possible. Movie perfect video. Anything. This is new.
English
282
68
875
80.5K