Ivan on Tech 🍳📈💰

GOOD EVENING CRYPTO!!! 🌕🌙🍵🫖 As I said in the stream yesterday 8th of October and Today - I AM NOT A FAN OF THE BITCOIN FAKE OUT!! Money Line on daily turned bearish after the fakeout BEAR RISK IS INCREASED 🚨🚨🚨 MOST PEOPLE ARE COMPLACENT RT IF YOU UNDERSTAND

@ukhomeoffice Get all grooming gangs arrested and cage them for life - castrate ideally Focus on victims - they are the “vulnerable communities “

Police time will no longer be wasted investigating legal social media posts, freeing up officers to patrol the streets and tackle real crime. By scrapping Non‑Crime Hate Incidents, we are balancing the protection of vulnerable communities while respecting free speech.

@Logozoic Haha it’s ok - new bull new opportunities The issue is getting the sect consume you for another cycle

@IvanOnTech NOOOOOO! I WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ONE OF THE MILLION MILLIONAIRES RICARDO CORAZON WAS SUPPOSED TO MAAAAAKE!!! AAAAAAAAAAAA

BITCOIN WILL BE $1,000,000 ONE DAY But only if it’s quantum safe “YES” is the only correct response when a billionaire boomer who wants to invest asks you if his “bitcoins” will survive quantum ANY OTHER YAPPING OR SAYING ANY OTHER ANSWER WILL SCARE AWAY THE INVESTOR

@nic_carter Bro we first need to put more and bigger NFTs on Bitcoin and maybe later we have time for quantum With love /bitcoin devs

this might seem like a reasonable take, but it's actually unreasonable and wildly risky. as the Google paper explicitly says (see below), and others note, you will not get warning. the warning is what you are getting now. this is your warning. once logical cubits start to meaningfully scale, you will go from cracking 5 bits to 256 bits very quickly. if you're wagering the future of a trillion dollar asset on QC development following a slow, predictable, linear path, with public milestones, you are taking an enormous risk. Google paper: "progress in quantum computing is better understood using a threshold model rather than in terms of the number of physical qubits" "there may be little time between the breaking of 32-bit ECDLP and the breaking of 256-bit ECDLP. Furthermore, the community should not expect to see published demonstrations of the most advanced quantum error-correction architectures and quantum algorithms deployed to cryptanalytic problems" the field is already self-censoring to avoid giving tools to black hats (again, see the Google paper). progress will happen in secret. additionally, as we all know, it will take a minimum of several years to fully transition. a signature scheme must be chosen, tested, deployed, soft forked, and adopted (this has to happen for every single address, which alone will take months). thus, you have to start acting several years before Q-day. unfortunately, the premise that the development of a CRQC will happen slowly, publicly, and predictably that almost all Bitcoin devs seem to be relying on, is false. Bitcoin devs will have to do something uncomfortable: act under conditions of uncertainty and make difficult and costly tradeoffs _before_ the threat seems clearly apparent. we will not have the luxury to waiting until a N bit key is broken. at that point, we will have weeks or months, not the years required. this means that the testing and deployment of a PQ signature scheme on Bitcoin has to occur in 2026.

@Logozoic No the fiverr dev Richard hired for copy pasting eth code won’t be able to solve it

@IvanOnTech PULSECHAIN.COM SOLVES THIS

@Rob251066173167 @elliotrades bullmania.com/book

@IvanOnTech @elliotrades Ivan where can I buy your book mate

Textbook bearish retest or I delete

@RationalAvocado Banks don’t have the same quantum problem as they can shut down online systems until they figure out a solution While crypto is impossible to shutdown, so crypto has to be prepared much much more seriously

@IvanOnTech Exactly! All those “what about banks, they also have problem” is just childish.

Bitcoin CRITICAL SUPPORT 🚨🚨 Hey this is Ivan on Tech, here is your daily brief: 📊 Bitcoin is tracking the average midterm year Look at the first chart below The white line is the average YTD performance of Bitcoin in a midterm year and the green line is Bitcoin YTD performance this year 2026. Should we follow the average midterm year the next move is DOWN. Below (in the 2nd chart) you see that Bitcoin now is at critical support, should it lose it we fall fast. Should it hold we retest $74,000 last year low. Oil WTI is above $100. Not good for stocks (and crypto). Trump is trying to pump the stock market with new peace deals/victory announcements EVERY MONDAY. That creates volatility. BE CAREFUL. Iran ground invasion very likely (just like we predicted during first days of the war - go back and read my old posts). 💡 What This Means Our analysis stays the same. BUY ZONE IS COMING! Massive, ABSOLUTELY MASSIVE gains will be made in the next bull, our strategy that got us out in October will get us in right when the next bull starts. Bitcoin and altcoins will go parabolic. Most people will play it wrong. 📞 Ready to Trade with a Plan? ​Book a free strategy call to evaluate your trading setup and see if our Mechanical Rules system fits your goals (if you are not part of Bullmania yet). 👉 bullmania.com 📚 BOOK LAUNCH! As promised I am notifying everyone on this list about my book launch! Big Profits™ is the true story of how Ivan on Tech went from devastating trading losses to managing tens of millions using a mechanical, rules-based system that removes emotion from every decision. This book gives you the exact framework, the psychology behind why most traders fail, and a clear path to consistent, repeatable results in any market. Get the book: 👉 bullmania.com/book

@sweepstake2502 🤣🤣🤣 my condolences Mr HEX

@IvanOnTech Shut up u tool

Quantum FUD worries me because three of Bitcoin's most influential devs seem to reject the urgency: - Luke Dashjr: 'BIP 360 doesn't quantum proof Bitcoin. Quantum isn't a real threat. Bitcoin has much bigger problems.' - Peter Todd: 'Cryptography relevant quantum computers do not exist. The demos running toy problems do not count.' - Adam Back: 'Probably not for 20-40 years, if then.' Google’s new 2029 deadline for post quantum migration is just three years away. Bitcoin does have a proposal: BIP 360. It reduces public key exposure but existing coins stay vulnerable until users manually migrate. Satoshi won't do that. On the other side, Ethereum Foundation taking the risk seriously and $ETH is outperforming BTC on the quantum timeline changes. So can Bitcoin Core devs show they are taking the issue seriously? Or is it easier to sell BTC (or rotate to ETH) first and then ask questions?

The average Bitcoiner's response to Quantum Computing

@htetmyataung_ Lfffggg

@IvanOnTech Ohh yesss.. waiting smell and feel the book

People love the size of the BIG PROFITS™️ book It’s nice and heavy Clients demand the physical version Ooh yes guys we are shopping as fast as we can!!

@FreedomDojo Lfg!!

@IvanOnTech Just snagged a copy! Super excited for this!

"IVAN WHERE IS BITCOIN GOING IN 2026?" We got the top exactly in October Made a fortune in this bear (while your other KOL told you constantly to keep buying) And we will make a fortune in the next bull today I am launching a very affordable book about how I trade, what works for me (millions and millions of $ in profits) - see below for book

"IVAN WHY DO YOU FLY PRIVATE JET INSTEAD OF BUYING DIPS??!!" wrong mindset guys 1. if you play the bull correctly you dont have to worry about expenses in the bear 2. for example exiting back in October 2025 is what made the difference for me, not expenses in bear 3. I am in crypto since 2013 and FUMBLING the bull exit has cost me 1000x more than enjoying the money in the bear - I explain all in the book (click below)

Good morning Now is not the time to panic The time to panic is if Bitcoin devs read these two papers and double down on their chosen solution of “hoping it goes away” Then panic.

@kostascrypto why debate? lets just be quantum proof instead of yapping and yelling fud etc

I WILL debate w/ Google, that quantum threat poisoning, the way it's described at least, is overstated... really

@EndTheEU richard is not allowed on any plane, he has to hide

@IvanOnTech Richard Heart marketing.

@michaeljburry time for bull?

Shorts are not forever.