Jay Wiseman (He/Him) 🇺🇦

@TheAtlantic Losing is now Winning because the World Cup starts next month.

So yesterday Donald Trump posted a video of him crashing Stephen Colbert's final show, and literally throwing him in the garbage, and of course, I had to FIX it.

@InsideLucysHead 😆😆👍

A policeman was interrogating 3 guys who were training to become detectives... To test their skills in recognizing a suspect, he shows the first guys a picture for 5 seconds and then hides it. "This is your suspect, how would you recognize him?" The first guy answers, "That's easy, we'll catch him fast because he only has one eye!" The policeman says, "Well...uh...that's because the picture I showed is his side profile." Slightly flustered by this ridiculous response, he flashes the picture for 5 seconds at the second guy and asks him, "This is your suspect, how would you recognize him?" The second guy smiles, flips his hair, and says, "Ha! He'd be too easy to catch because he only has one ear!" The policeman angrily responds, "What's the matter with you two?? Of course only one eye and one ear are showing because it's a picture of his side profile! Is that the best answer you can come up with?" Extremely frustrated at this point, he shows the picture to the third guy and in a very testy voice asks, "This is your suspect, how would you recognize him? He quickly adds, "Think hard before giving me a stupid answer." The third guy looks at the picture intently for a moment and says, "the suspect wears contact lenses." The policeman is surprised and speechless because he really doesn't know himself if the suspect wears contacts or not. "Well, that's an interesting answer. Wait here for a few minutes while I check his file and I'll get back to you on that." He leaves the room and goes to his office, checks the suspect's file on his computer, and comes back with a beaming smile on his face. "Wow! I can't believe it. It's TRUE! The suspect does, in fact, wear contact lenses. Good work! How were you able to make such an astute observation?" "That's easy," the third guy replied." He can't wear regular glasses because he only has one eye and one ear."

@LePapillonBlu2 [singing] You got to know when to hold 'em Know when to fold 'em

These maga cowards are really tough when it comes to women!

@EastEndJoe 😆😆👍

Benefits of being over 60. 👇

@IamGrokDK What tattoo? 😆😆

X World Forecast for tomorrow🌞🌤️🌧️ Just added Spain to the squad today! 🇪🇸 Most of you probably don’t even read these texts… so let’s test it 👀 If you’re still here, comment what the British weather girl’s new tattoo says. Say it loud enough so Keir Wanker Starmer can hear it too 😂 #XWorldForecast #Amelia #SpainForecast

@Hoodratglass @its_The_Dr @grok 😆😆👍

@its_The_Dr @grok what is this comedians name?

Oh she shut that lady down. 🤣😂

George Carlin Explains.

@Aella_Girl #Yep. This is why pre-play negotiations are so important in the BDSM community.

Turns out this is a weird question. I was trying to design a survey to figure out if men were learning incorrect things in porn. My goal was okay - ask guys if they watch porn. Then ask them about, expectation of what women want done to them in bed. See if the guys who watch porn report different expectations. Simple, right? Okay. So how do I ask about this? "You have sex with a woman. If you tried [slapping her face], do you think she'd like it?" Well, a guy reading that would prob go "it depends on the woman." I could say "The last time you had sex with a woman, do you think she would have liked if you tried [slapping her face]?" Well, probably for most men that's gonna be a girlfriend or wife, and by the time you're regularly banging someone, you're gonna know her preferences, and you'd just be answering directly for what you know she likes. Okay, so this has to be like, about a girl you just met? First time having sex, and assume yall are bad at communication and so don't talk about your preferences in advance. So I could say "You just meet a woman, if you slap her face without asking her do you think she'd like it?" Most guys would never try this with a girl they just met without asking. So okay - this scenario needs to have *some* level of trust involved. Maybe it's like, the second or third date after you've built up friendly rapport and established you like each other? But... most guys still would ask! When I escorted, guys would sort of indicate a request to do anything particularly porny. Guys rarely just wildly try something brand new without some type of in-the-moment negotiation about 'can i?' because they don't wanna offend me or ruin the mood. So I ended up settling on this scenario: "Imagine you've been on a few dates with a girl and have good rapport. You decide to try a thing, *without* discussing it beforehand. Predict how likely it is that she would respond positively to it." Like, when I had to really drill down into it, picking a scenario clear enough to measure where porn is causing guys to do things women don't want in bed, required an extremely specific scenario. Because either you're so new that trying some crazy porn scenario is *retarded* to pull out on a woman without checking in first, or you're sufficiently established that any level of basic communication would make it clear that this isn't a welcome activity. So when people are arguing that porn teaches men to do porn things in bed, idk what concrete thing they're envisioning. I think probably if this is true, it's much more subtle. (Btw, I found that men who watched porn, were slightly more accurate at predicting the responses of women's preferences in bed, but especially women who watched porn.)

@Sexwithcatalina Speaking as a sex educator myself, this is a pretty good approach for any type of "alternative" sex.

Try this script and report back pls

@josh_uglyasf 😆😆👍

she ain't lying for the most part... that explanation is always coming from something they're trying to hide.

@its_The_Dr 😆😆👍

Always a favorite, if you wanna stop Hunger. 😂🤣

Love me some existential BDSM 😂

A Harvard psychiatrist spent 85 years tracking 724 men from their teenage years to their deathbeds to find out what actually makes a human life worth living, and the answer that came back is the one almost nobody in their twenties or thirties is willing to act on. His name is Robert Waldinger. He runs the Harvard Study of Adult Development, the longest scientific study of happiness in human history. It started in 1938. It is still running today. Most studies last a few years. This one has outlived its founders, its second director, and most of its original participants. The setup was simple. Researchers recruited 724 young men. Half were Harvard sophomores. The other half were teenagers from Boston's poorest neighborhoods. They wanted to follow them for the rest of their lives and find out what actually predicted a good life. Then they did the thing nobody else had the patience to do. They waited. For 85 years, the team measured everything they could think of. Blood tests. Brain scans. Income. Marriages. Mental health. Sleep. Loneliness. Every two years, the men answered questionnaires. Every five years, they had a full medical exam. Some of them became senators. One became President. Some ended up homeless. When the data finally came in, the result was so simple that the researchers spent years looking for what they had missed. It was not money. It was not IQ. It was not social class. It was not career success. It was not even genes. The single strongest predictor of who would be happy, healthy, and mentally sharp at 80 was the quality of their close relationships at 50. Not the number of friends. Not the size of the network. The depth of the connection. The men who had at least one person they could call in the middle of the night were measurably healthier 30 years later. The lonely ones, regardless of wealth, declined faster across almost every metric the team could measure. The detail that should disturb every ambitious person reading this is the one most people skip. The Harvard sophomores in the study had every external advantage you can name. Elite education. Family money. Strong networks. That advantage meant almost nothing if they reached middle age without people who actually loved them. The privileged loners aged worse than the working-class men with strong families. Waldinger has been asked the same question in every interview he has done in the last ten years. What is the lesson? His answer never changes. He says people in their twenties and thirties believe they need to chase fame and money and achievement to have a good life. The 80-year-old men in his study who actually had it figured out say the opposite. They wish they had spent less time at the office and more time with the people who mattered. You will not believe him. Almost nobody in their twenties or thirties does. The data has been public for decades and the world has not changed. The reason is that the cost of investing in people you love does not pay off for 30 years, but the cost of investing in career success pays off next quarter. The brain is built to chase the next quarter. It cannot see the 30-year compounding curve. The good news is that the men who repaired old relationships in their 60s and 70s still gained measurable health benefits. The brain does not stop responding to connection just because you waited. But every year you wait costs you compounding interest you cannot get back. Your career will outlive you for about three months. The people you loved well will carry you for the rest of recorded time. You are not behind on your goals. You are behind on your phone calls.

@its_The_Dr 😆😆👍

Yep! He should have never said what he was thinking! 🤔 😂

“Wait so you’re telling me…”

@Paddystinian Now if only the Iranian government hadn't machine-gunned tens of thousands of protesters, imprisoned tens of thousands more, summarily executed hundreds of people, and imposed a near-total press and internet blackout about their doing so, I'd enjoy these videos a lot more. ☹️

Another Lego-Style Banger By Militar Krafte: T.O.L.L. — Welcome to the Persian Toll 🇮🇷.  #StraitOfHormuz #Iran #Paddystinian

@FemSub18 They're called "ruined orgasms" and I suggest you negotiate ahead of time that one might occur.