Steve Milloy

13 million views. Even @ElonMusk commented. Twitter tried to censor it but just wound up exposing (again) the lying nature of climate alarmism. Added bonus: My explanation and warming prediction. junkscience.com/2023/01/milloy…

Taxpayer-subsidized golf, skiing, pets and, now, showering? Medicare pays for greens fees, ski passes and pet supplies for seniors under guise of maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Sen. Angus King now wants Medicare to pay for bath mats. 🙄 washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/…

Dumb-as-a-box-of-rocks MAHA threatens Republicans over PFAS: "As Kelly Ryerson, who goes by “The Glyphosate Girl” on social media, told my colleague Lisa Friedman, “I would strongly advise the E.P.A. not to move forward on deregulating PFAS if they want to win the November midterms.”" Reality: 1. Sorry "Glyphosate Girl"🙄, PFAS (aka 'forever chemicals') have nothing to do with glyphosate. 2. PFAS are inert and safe, and do not merit heightened regulatory attention. PFAS in drinking water are already regulated thousands of times more stringently than the most toxic substance known to man (botulinum toxin). 3. MAHA activists are vacuous. NYTimes @LFFriedman knows this but can't pass up useful idiots. nytimes.com/2026/05/23/opi…

Global warming update: Today's high of 56°F in WashDC will be 41°F cooler than the 97°F high reached 101 years ago on May 23, 1925.

Some situational awareness re infrastructure: The federal and state governments – as well as media – are guilty of perpetrating the multi-trillion-dollar climate hoax and Green New Scam on us. It has distracted everyone and diverted tax dollars to garbage green energy vs. vital infratsructure improvement and repairs. It would be helpful if the renovated Washington Post editorial board could take the bold move of apologizing for the role the Post still plays in promoting the climate hoax. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/…

Following up on yesterday's meat scare the Washington Post cooked up for Memorial Day Weekend, I asked @grok to draw a graph of US meat consumption vs. colon cancer incidence since the 1970s. The two are inversely associated. While this is not a thorough debunking of the (bogus) claim that eating meat increases colon cancer risk, looking at this data, normal researchers (vs. anti-meat junk scientists) would not be interested in pursuing the claim. 2/

This is just a false claim about charred beef and cancer: 1. Substances formed by cooking meat at high temps (e.g., heterocyclic amines) have not been credibly linked with cancer in humans. 2. Also, beware of vegetarians scaring you about meat. The top NIH anti-meat crusader was a vegetarian from India. So beware.👇

But there's more: All Americans doing business in China are consciously or unconsciously betraying our country. Doing business with China has made us entirely vulnerable to the communists. Our plan to liberalize China with trade has been a fail. And, now, we have checkmated ourselves with such vulnerability. If China wanted Taiwan, they could take it and it would be suicidal for us to stop them. We are only lucky that China doesn't quite have the courage yet to put the gun to our head. It's not yet too late to remedy the problem, but the clock is ticking.

Dear Senator Outhouse: Roger Pielke Jr. is not a "climate denier." I know what a "climate denier" is and Pielke Jr. is not one of us. He is what we call a "lukewarmer" – someone who believes in the basic climate hoax but has some other bone to pick with it on occasion. As always, you are full of it.

They Want to Dim the Sun to Save the Earth – The Climate Realism Show #203 x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

We need the oil vs. the Communist China-funded radical green groups and their running dog 'military leaders.'👇

How crazy is the EPA drinking water standard for PFAS ("forever chemicals")? 1. The EPA standard is 4 parts per trillion (4 ppt). 2. Botulinum toxin (perhaps the most toxic substance known) is safe, per @grok, up until levels reach the "low thousands of ppt." 3. Keep in mind that botulinum toxin has demonstrable adverse health effects, e.g., death. There is no such evidence that anyone has ever been harmed by PFAS. Every dollar spent on PFAS hysteria is a wasted dollar.

Butterflies are free to fly but the NYTimes is not free to lie: Climate propagandist @CatrinEinhorn blames demise of the Sacramento Mountains' checkerspot butterfly on global warming. But raw temperature data since 1915 only show temperature variations that do not correlate with rising emissions. nytimes.com/2026/05/21/cli…

If you need more evidence that natural conditions (vs. emissions) drive hurricane seasons, NYTimes meteorologist Judson Jones admits it. nytimes.com/2026/05/22/opi…

We ought NOT tax the rich more. We should shrink the federal government more. And if we even just ended the waste, fraud and abuse, that would be far more than could be squeezed out of the rich. nytimes.com/2026/05/22/opi…

ExxonMobil may return to Venezuela. If so, kudos to President Trump and his Special Forces diplomacy. nytimes.com/2026/05/21/wor…

Here the ultimate test in @GavinNewsom v. Chevron: Let Gavin Newsom not govern California for the weekend and let Chevron shutdown. Let's see who Californians miss more. apnews.com/article/califo…

Three points on why you shouldn't put too much stock in what "AI leaders" say about job losses: 1. These are people who misjudged the popularity of their own product and its energy requirements. While "AI leaders" are great coders, they have severe limitations otherwise. 2. AI will open up all sorts of new jobs, many unforeseen, that will be more productive than current jobs. 3. America needs to re-industrialize. That will create many jobs that have been sent to China and India over the past few decades. washingtonpost.com/technology/202…

No complacency allowed: We are years, if not a decade away from "loosening" China's domination of rare earth minerals processing. Expansion in Australia is worthwhile in peacetime but it is geographically much closer to China than to the US. We need domestic mining and processing to meet our needs yesterday. We need to cut regulations, especially permitting red tape, standing in the way of private domestic production. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/…

Five quick points on why we need the oil from offshore drilling much more than we need military training for a war against China: 1. War against China is unlikely as it would be suicidal. 2. For the foreseeable future, a break in relations between the US and China would be catastrophic to our economy. 3. Over the last 25 years, the US has become reliant on China for vital material like processed rare earth minerals. 4. No one is really doing anything to decouple us from China. 5. This effort to prevent offshore oil drilling is being pushed by leftists, if not China itself. wapo.st/4wGaKak