Lorena

"Mom, what were you like in the 90s?"

@hashvl Lo sigo recordando como el mejor festival al que asistí 😍

Irreal fue este lineup, nunca más fue tan bueno y tan barato, sin campo vip. El verdadero tenías que estar ahí.

@Fabri_0021 @P2Pdotme Me tienta ese pool 😝

🚀 ¡Nueva campaña activa! P2P Protocol: Repensando el P2P • Pool de 7600 USDC • 5 días @P2Pdotme — rampa on/off descentralizada para comprar y vender USDC con métodos de pago locales ⚠️ El acceso se prioriza según tu actividad reciente en 3look 👇 Unite acá

@suka_df @SEEDLatam Tan feliz de haber coincidido contigo en SEED. Emanás brillo, alegría y entusiasmo donde sea que estés! Deseo que sigan los éxitos y ojalá que podamos coincidir pronto otra vez✨

Llegó el momento. Hoy les comparto que termina mi etapa en @SEEDLatam Pensando en cómo comunicar esto, me sorprendió todo lo que hicimos junto al equipo: → Organizamos la Gira SEED. Una serie de eventos acercando Blockchain a todo el país con 9 paradas, +1400 asistentes, +35 partners nacionales y +20 coberturas en medios. → Coordinamos ETHCON. La primera conferencia oficial de @Ethereum en Argentina con +3000 asistentes, +30 instituciones académicas y los referentes más importantes de la industria. → Lideramos el Latam Community Hub. Un espacio de encuentro durante @EFDevcon Argentina que reunió a las organizaciones de todo el continente, donde +50 comunidades pudieron alinear iniciativas de cara al futuro. → Armamos 4 Scholarship Programs. Programas pensados para que perfiles con talento y potencial se acerquen a las grandes conferencias de la industria. Apoyamos a 15 jóvenes que hoy construyen su camino. → Producimos +50 eventos y conferencias. Workshops, coworking days, y entre ellos el festejo por los 10 años de Ethereum. Facilitamos espacios de capacitación y mentoría para los builders del ecosistema. → Acercamos Blockchain y educación a universidades y colegios. A partir de las distintas iniciativas, parte del trabajo implicó conectar con +30 universidades y desarrollamos jornadas académicas con contenidos para que los estudiantes pudieran involucrarse. ¿Qué me llevo? → Hermosos vínculos y amistades. Realmente en SEED lo que destaca es la calidez y la calidad de las personas que forman parte del equipo. Agradecer sobre todo a @candufaz y @Caboning por el gran trabajo que hicimos juntos y todo lo que logramos. Son personas que quiero y admiro muchísimo. → Experiencia liderando equipos multidisciplinarios donde tuve que aprender cómo implementar sistemas de coordinación y gestión. Muchas veces empezábamos proyectos desde 0 o con poco tiempo de preparación, y era necesario pensar cómo los equipos iban a organizarse. → Experiencia produciendo conferencias y eventos. Lideré las operaciones en las iniciativas que producimos, y eso me dio un track record en facilitar conexiones y desarrollar programas que generen impacto. → 1 gran aprendizaje: Tu comunidad es tu verdadero rango de impacto en la sociedad. Son quienes perciben directamente el valor de lo que producís, y pueden convertirse en tus más fieles colegas (si actuás con amor). Ahi es donde encontré yo al menos mi propósito sirviéndole a mis pares. ¿Qué sigue? Qué buena pregunta. Trabajando en SEED validé aún más mi pasión en educar y conectar personas, generando oportunidades para que se potencien. Quisiera que mi próxima etapa siga conectada con educar, construir comunidad y abrir puertas. Estoy abierto a oportunidades en Growth, Operaciones y Ecosystem Building. Gracias a toda la comunidad de Latam y al universo por la oportunidad de vivir todo esto y lo que logramos. Conocí gente muy grosa en el camino y me llevo una hermosa experiencia. Los TKM, Suka.

De una vida a otra vida.

I am homesick for a world that no longer exists

Were you there ??

@Thedonkey @cryptochica_arg kinga total! 👑

A pessoa mais bem relacionada da web3 na LATAM é @cryptochica_arg . Tudo que ela toca, vira. Impressionante.

The real danger of AI isn’t job loss. It’s losing the habit of thinking.

gracias

No es sano para ti basar toda tu personalidad en tu profesión, no te pierdas a ti mismo

Stablecoins are boring 🥱 Just as they should be. They stay still so you can keep moving forward ➡️

La IA no te hace developer como la calculadora no te hace matemático La IA no te hace developer como la calculadora no te hace matemático La IA no te hace developer como la calculadora no te hace matemático

era feliz y lo sabía

BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE

I put this same comment under the original post but I share it here as well, so you know 😉: The fact that a protocol @P2Pdotme follows the lead of successful cases of other protocols like the ones you cited, in the sense of betting for actual descentralization and governance (with futarchy this time) to keep the protocol running even in the tighest of regulatory scenarios. 2026 is a tough year for the true believers of decentralization. Regulations are being worked on all over the place, even in my country (Paraguay) there are regulations and resolutions about crypto that are in WIP state. We should stick to what protocols P2P deliver: a product that can be used right away, a product that you can use everyday, a product that you can use it at any time, that is simple and intuitive and drives the path of actual mass adoption. It feels challenging, but I see it with cute eyes. The future is P2P!

Why ICO instead of raising more VC ? Read this 👌

The fact that a protocol @P2Pdotme follows the lead of successful cases of other protocols like the ones you cited, in the sense of betting for actual descentralization and governance (with futarchy this time) to keep the protocol running even in the tighest of regulatory scenarios. 2026 is a tough year for the true believers of decentralization. Regulations are being worked on all over the place, even in my country (Paraguay) there are regulations and resolutions about crypto that are in WIP state. We should stick to what protocols P2P deliver: a product that can be used right away, a product that you can use everyday, a product that you can use it at any time, that is simple and intuitive and drives the path of actual mass adoption. It feels challenging, but I see it with cute eyes. The future is P2P!

I've been thinking about a dynamic that doesn't get discussed enough: the relationship between token distribution and regulatory survival. The basic observation is simple. Regulation needs a target. A CEO to subpoena, a company to sue, a bank account to freeze. This is how enforcement works. But what happens when there's no target? When ownership is distributed across 50,000 people in 120 countries? When there's no headquarters, no corporate entity, no single point of failure? We have clear examples of this playing out. Bitcoin achieved this state organically over a decade. Satoshi disappeared. Mining distributed coins to thousands of participants worldwide. Today there's no Bitcoin Inc to shut down. Regulators understand this. They go after exchanges like Binance and Coinbase, but Bitcoin itself keeps producing blocks every 10 minutes regardless of what any government decides. Ethereum did it more intentionally. The 2014 crowdsale distributed ETH to thousands of early participants across jurisdictions. The Ethereum Foundation @ethereum exists but doesn't control the protocol. When the SEC started asking questions about whether ETH was a security, the answer increasingly became "it doesn't matter because there's no issuer to regulate anymore." Multiple independent teams maintain clients. No single entity can be compelled to change the protocol. Uniswap is the DeFi-era example. @UniswapLabsVC built the protocol, but then distributed UNI tokens broadly and deployed immutable contracts. Today even if Uniswap Labs got shut down tomorrow, the protocol would keep running. The frontend can be geo-blocked, and it has been, but the smart contracts don't care. Anyone can build an interface. The liquidity stays. Tornado Cash showed the limits and the stakes. The protocol was decentralized but the developers weren't distributed enough. They got arrested. The contracts still run, but the case demonstrated that decentralization has to be real and complete, not just aesthetic. Now we're seeing a new wave attempting this transition in real time. @p2pdotme protocol is where we're putting this thesis into practice. We're building decentralized on/off ramps, which is maybe the most regulatory-sensitive category in crypto. Converting between fiat and stablecoins without custodial escrow. We're launching the $P2P token with 50% floating at TGE, no insider unlocks at launch, ownership transferring to token holders through futarchy-based governance. The explicit goal is that the protocol becomes community-owned infrastructure rather than a company product. We chose this structure deliberately because fiat ramps are exactly the kind of thing regulators pay attention to. If we're going to build something that lets anyone in the world convert between local currency and crypto without intermediaries, it needs to be owned by everyone, not controlled by us. The pattern across all these examples is consistent. Start with a team, build something valuable, distribute ownership as widely as possible, step back from control. The team that builds the protocol is not the same as the community that runs it. The transition is the key. Here's where it gets interesting. We're now in a period where innovation is moving maybe 10x to 100x faster than regulatory frameworks can adapt. AI agents executing financial transactions. New forms of coordination that don't map to existing legal categories. Protocols doing things regulators haven't even contemplated yet. The traditional advice is "wait for regulatory clarity." But clarity might take 5 years. Your runway is 18 months. What do you do? One answer, increasingly, is to decentralize fast enough that by the time regulators decide what category you belong to, there's no longer a "you" to regulate. Just a protocol. Just a coordination pattern maintained by thousands of independent actors. This reframes what ICOs actually are. The common view is that an ICO is a fundraising mechanism that happens to use tokens. I'd argue the more important framing is that an ICO is a decentralization mechanism that happens to raise money. The fundraising is almost a side effect. What matters is the ownership distribution. Think about it. A project that raises $10M from 100,000 people has done something fundamentally different from one that raises $100M from 10 VCs. The first has potentially achieved sufficient decentralization. The second has just done a traditional fundraise with token aesthetics. The implications for protocol design are significant. If decentralization is a survival strategy rather than just a philosophical preference, then you should optimize your token launch for distribution breadth rather than capital raised. Airdrops to actual users. Liquidity mining. Grants to contributors. Geographic diversity. Minimal VC concentration. Fast vesting for insiders. Anything that spreads ownership as widely as possible, as quickly as possible. Some will object that this is just regulatory arbitrage. Maybe. But I'd distinguish between two cases. Using decentralization to continue doing something clearly illegal is bad and the decentralization doesn't make it legitimate. But using decentralization to preserve useful innovation while regulatory frameworks catch up is different. It's buying time for society to evaluate whether the technology is beneficial. The printing press faced regulatory hostility. So did radio. So did encryption. In each case, the technology survived long enough to prove its value, and regulation eventually adapted. Decentralization can serve the same function for crypto and AI protocols. It's not evasion. It's preservation. The protocols that understand this will structure themselves accordingly. Fast path to community ownership. Minimal insider concentration. Multiple independent teams capable of maintaining the code. Global distribution of token holders. No single entity that can be compelled to shut things down. Bitcoin proved this model works. Ethereum refined it. Uniswap demonstrated it scales to DeFi. The next generation of protocols, in payments and AI agents and whatever comes next, will either learn from these examples or risk becoming regulatory casualties. And when the regulatory dust settles in 5 or 10 years, the decentralized protocols will still be running. The ones that stayed centralized while waiting for clarity may not be. Not financial or legal advice. Just observations about the strategic landscape.

you had to be there for this to make sense