ibn baramy

[السكوت للأحمق جواب] قال الإمام سليمان بن مهران الأعمش رحمه الله: السكوت للأحمق جواب. قال ابن حبان في روضة العقلاء ٢٩٦: (إذا امتحن المرء بعشرة الأحمق كان الواجب عَلَيْهِ اللزوم لأخلاق نفسه والمباينة لأخلاقه مع الإكثار من الحمدلله على مَا وهب له من الانتباه لما حرم غيره التوفيق له).

{إِن تَنصُرُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ یَنصُرۡكُمۡ وَیُثَبِّتۡ أَقۡدَامَكُمۡ} قال أبو أمامة الباهلي رضي الله عنه: قد فتح الفتوح قومٌ، ما كانت حلية سيوفهم الذهب ولا الفضة، إنما كانت حليتهم العَلابيَّ والآنُك والحديد. البخاري ٢٩٠٩ العلابي: الجلود غير المدبوغة. (الآنُك): الرصاص.

[وما يتخلف عنها إلا منافق معلوم النفاق] قال الإمام ابن القيم رحمه الله: (ومن استقرأ علامات النِّفاق في السُّنَّة وجدها إمَّا ترك فريضةٍ، أو فعل محرَّمٍ). كتاب الصلاة ٢٢٩

Abū ‘Iyād Amjad Rafīq of Salafī Publications: A Recent History of Calculated “Retractions”. A rebuttal of the claim that it is haddādiyyah to continue to clarify the errors of Abū ‘Iyād since he has already “clarified/retracted” from them. Read full article here: t.me/SalafiDawaLanc…

[ما يَنبغي لأهلِ العِلمِ عند وقوعِ الفِتن] قال العلّامة النّوويُّ في(شرح صحيحِ مسلمٍ)(٢/ ١٠٧):"وأمّا ما فَعلَهُ جُندبُ بنُ عبدِ اللَّهِ رضي اللَّهُ عنهُ مِنْ جَمعِ النّفَرِ ووعظِهِمْ،ففيهِ: أنّهُ يَنبغِي للعالِمِ والرَّجُلِ العَظِيمِ المُطَاعِ وذِي الشُّهْرةِ أنْ يُسَكِّنَ النّاسَ عِندَ الفِتَنِ،ويَعِظَهُمْ ويُوَضِّحَ لَهُمُ الدّلائِلَ".

Did Sheikh Arafat lie about Abu Iyaad? @Arafatbinhassan @AbuIyaadSP Our brother Abu Abdillah Umar Ahmed responds to this here.

🎥 A Critique of Abū ʿIyāḍ's Methods & His Accusations Against S͟hayk͟h @Arafatbinhassan Al-Muḥammadī 🗣️ Abū ʿAbdillah ʿUmar Aḥmad (waffaqahullāh) Graduate of Islamic University in Madinah and a student of S͟hayk͟h ʿArafāt Al-Muḥammadī (ḥafiẓahullāh) 🔗youtu.be/iauBl15Ap_0?si…

Sh. ʿArafāt ibn Ḥasan was asked about a man who had his tooth removed & was told by the doctor not to rinse his mouth—how should he do wuḍū’? He answered: “He leaves off rinsing the mouth, does wuḍū’ for the sound limbs, and then does tayammum in place of rinsing the mouth.”

The noble Shaykh, the faqīh, ʿArafāt ibn Ḥasan, was asked whether the sutrah (barrier in prayer) is obligatory or recommended. He answered: “It is a highly stressed Sunnah, so be keen upon it. This is the madhhab of the four jurist Imams.”

رحم الله شيخنا وغفر له وجزاك الله خيراً فعلاً هؤلاء لايقيمون دروساً ولا يكتبون كتباً يشرحون فيها متون العلم فالفراغ سمةٌ لهم وعدم نشر العلم شرحاً أو تأليفاً سمةٌ لهم كذلك ونفخ الأغمار والجهال سمةٌ لهم ثم تجدهم يحاكمون السلفيين ببعض القضايا المنهجية التي فهموها فهماً أعوج فأفسدوا أيما فساد ولكن من نعم الله أن أمرهم أصبح مكشوفاً للكثيرين بعد أن تتابعت الردود عليهم

سُئل الشيخ العلامة عبيد الجابري -حفظه الله-: أحسن الله إليكم، يقول: هل تنصحنا باستخدام مصطلح (سلفي غير واضح) فيمن نشكُّ في منهجه؟ الجواب: هذا ليس من عبارات أهل السنة، كيف (سلفي غير واضح)! أبداً، هذا تناقض. السلفي واضح؛ وذلك أن عقيدته ومنهجه كلاهما على قال الله وقال رسوله وقال الصحابة وقال الأئمة. ما هناك سلفي واضح وسلفي غير واضح أبداً. لكن يُمكن أن يقال قوي وضعيف، سلفي قوي وسلفي ضعيف، يضعف أحياناً وكثيراً عن الصدع بالحق (هذا ضعيف)، وسلفي قوي. قال ﷺ: "المؤمن القوي خيرٌ من المؤمن الضعيف وفي كلٍّ خير". [شرح أصول السنة للإمام أحمد، الدرس الثالث] bit.ly/3hzml6m قلت: لا يمكن لبعض الفارغين أن يكونوا واضحين وهم متلطخون بالسفه والطيش، وشلة منهم متخصصه في الطعن في الشيخ العلامة عبد الله البخاري -حفظه الله- فهم على خطى أهل البدع والضلال شعروا أم لم يشعروا. لم نر إلى الآن ذرة رد علمي، للأسف شغلوا الشباب بالمهاترات. ليتهم يتفرغون للدروس ونشر العلم وخطب الجمعة، وليتهم يقيمون دورات علمية نافعة. أين الكتابات العلمية والبحوث السلفية؟!

كن على علم وبصيرة إذا أردت أن تتكلم في أمور الجرح والتعديل، والأمر بالمعروف والنهي عن المنكر. وستعلم بعلمك وبصيرتك متى تسكت ومتى تتكلم، وستراعي المصالح والمفاسد وستكون على طريقة ومنهج العلماء الربانيين الراسخين المهديين. أما الجهال والمتعالمون والفارغون لا يحق لهم أن يتصدروا للجرح والتعديل والتقعيد والتأصيل والتضليل، لأن فاقد الشيء لا يعطيه.

A beautiful and sincere final remark, this is all that has ever been requested of Abū Iyād Amjad Rafīq. “Return back to the scholars and do not let Shaytān get ahold of you”

⚠️ Refutation of Abū ‘Iyād Amjad Rafīq of Salafī Publications regarding his Attacks on Shaykh ‘Arafāt al-Muhammadī حفظه الله By Ustādh Mūsā Khalaf (Graduate Madīnah University) along with other brothers from Switzerland & elsewhere Read document here: t.me/SalafiDawaLanc…

Indeed, be cautious — especially of those who use “decades of service” to justify wrongdoings and deflect sincere, warranted criticism of scholars. Calling to “return to the scholars” isn’t a slogan — it’s a principle. If that reminder unsettles some, perhaps the issue isn’t with the call itself, but with what it exposes. True Salafī students welcome correction and remain connected to the scholars — in both word and deed.

The Ruling of Taking Knowledge from The One Who Used to be Upon Uprightness but Then Deviated — Part 1 Al-ʿAllāmah S͟hayk͟h Muqbil ibn Hādī Al-Wādiʿī, may Allāh have mercy on him, was asked the following question: Question: Those who were regarded as being upon the correct methodology, then deviated from it, is it permissible for us to listen to their recordings, read their earlier writings, and attend their lectures? Answer: I do not advise reading their books nor listening to their recordings. I am impressed by a profound statement of S͟hayk͟hul-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, who said: “if Allāh had not brought forth Al-Buk͟hārī and Muslim, He would not have allowed His religion to be lost.”   Allāh, Glorified and Exalted, has preserved the religion. Allāh says: ﴿إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا الذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُ لَحَافِظُونَ﴾  “Indeed, it is We who have sent down the Reminder, and indeed, We will preserve it.” So I advise keeping away from their books, recordings, and attending their lectures. They themselves are in need of being called back, to return to the Book of Allāh and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allāh, may Allāh raise his rank and grant him peace, and to repent to Allāh for what occurred from them in the Gulf issue and other matters. Source: Tuḥfatul-Mujīb (p. 209) Translation: Zubayr ʿAbbāsī

The Ruling of Taking Knowledge from The One Who Used to be Upon Uprightness but Then Deviated — Part 2 Al-ʿAllāmah Rabīʿ Al-Madk͟halī, may Allāh have mercy on him, was asked the following question: Question: Some of those who have been criticised had authored books. So some people ask: can benefit be taken from their works written before criticism arose against them and before their deviation from the Salafi methodology became apparent, or not? Answer: In the name of Allāh, the Most Merciful, the Bestower of Mercy. All praise is for Allāh, and may peace and blessings be upon the Messenger of Allāh, his family, his companions, and those who follow his guidance. To proceed: In answering this question, I say: if the person you mentioned has writings that were upon the methodology of the righteous salaf in creed, daʿwah, and manhaj, free from blemish, and then later deviated, then his deviation must be examined. If it is a slip from the slips of scholars, those for whom repentance and return to the truth is hoped, then such a slip is overlooked, good is hoped for him, and patience is exercised with him. But if his evil spreads, intensifies, and he persists arrogantly, refusing to return to what is correct, then among his punishments is that the truth is no longer accepted from him. As some of the Salaf said: “from the punishment of the people of innovation is that their truthfulness is not accepted.” We are in no need of such individuals, for we have the Book of Allāh, the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allāh, may Allāh raise his rank and grant him peace, and the vast, rich legacy left by our predecessors in all fields; creed, methodology, manners, lawful and unlawful, and the like. People are quick to rush towards what is new, though that very novelty may conceal trials and ruin. So hold firmly, first and foremost, to the Book of Allāh and the Sunnah of His Messenger, may Allāh raise his rank and grant him peace; in them is guidance, in them is light, and in them is sufficiency and richness. Then to the narrations of the Salaf, which revolve around these two foundations, the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger, may Allāh raise his rank and grant him peace, affirming people upon their meanings in creed and methodology. And they are abundant, exceedingly so. So draw your knowledge from them, all praise is for Allāh. For there is fear that a student may be snatched away by those who outwardly displayed the Salafī manhaj, then Allāh exposed their reality and uncovered their intentions. This has occurred often in our time: people who appeared to be upon the Salafī methodology, then as days passed and events unfolded, they were exposed. We do not know, and Allāh knows best, whether they were truly convinced of the Salafī path or merely concealing their reality. Allāh knows their true state. Such people, in my view, are to be dispensed with. No regret is to be felt over them or what they offered. We have what suffices and enriches us, all praise is for Allāh. And I ask Allāh, the Most High, to keep us and you firm upon the truth, and to protect us and you from trials, both apparent and hidden. Indeed, our Lord is All-Hearing of supplication. And may Allāh send peace and blessings upon our Prophet Muḥammad, his family, and his companions. Source: Al-Lubāb min Majmūʿ Naṣā’iḥ As͟h-S͟hayk͟h Rabīʿ li’l-S͟habāb (p. 381) Translation: Zubayr ʿAbbāsī

سمعتُ شيخَنا العلّامةَ عبدَ الله البخاريَّ يقولُ الليلةَ: "العلمُ يُرادُ للعملِ، كما أنّ العملَ يُرادُ للنجاةِ" @dr_albukhary

Ustādh Gamāl ibn Rabeeʿ: “I heard our Shaykh, the ʿAllāmah, ʿAbdullāh al-Bukhārī, say tonight: «Knowledge is sought for the sake of action, just as action is sought for the sake of salvation.»”

تزكية الأئمة الأعلام: الشيخ محمد أمان الجامي، والشيخ ربيع بن هادي المدخلي رحمهما الله لتلميذهما الشيخ عبد الله البخاري حفظه الله.