Julie Obradovic

1K posts

Julie Obradovic banner
Julie Obradovic

Julie Obradovic

@obradvocate

Advocate | Author "An Unfortunate Coincidence: a mother's life inside the autism controversy" (Skyhorse 2016) | Contributing Editor, Age of Autism | OG MAHA Mom

Illinois Katılım Mart 2023
466 Takip Edilen318 Takipçiler
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Ihtesham Ali
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005·
A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.
Ihtesham Ali tweet media
English
2.3K
42.5K
114.5K
8.4M
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Robby Starbuck
Robby Starbuck@robbystarbuck·
Alright everyone can pack it up for this year’s graduation commencement speeches because Eric Church gave the best one I’ve ever heard. 🔥
English
228
1.4K
8.3K
289.8K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
Bloodletting for fever. Confident. Standard practice. Mercury tablets for syphilis. Confident. Widely prescribed. Radium water for low energy. Confident. Sold in pharmacies. Lobotomies for anxiety. Confident. Won a Nobel Prize. Thalidomide for morning sickness. Confident. Distributed to millions. Cigarettes for throat irritation. Confident. Doctor-endorsed advertising. Heroin for coughs. Confident. Marketed by Bayer. DDT sprayed in children's schools. Confident. Government-approved. Margarine instead of butter. Confident. Heart-healthy alternative. Dietary fat causes heart disease. Confident. Fifty years of guidelines. Statins for everyone over fifty. Confident. Best-selling drug in history. Seed oils are safe. Confident. Endorsed by every major health body. Meat is carcinogenic. Confident. WHO classification still stands. Every generation of doctors was confident. Every generation was wrong about something they were certain of. The question isn't whether to trust doctors. The question is which part of the current list turns out to be the thalidomide.
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
359
4.3K
12.9K
170.3K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Brivael Le Pogam
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael·
Je crois qu'on ne mesure pas ce qu'Elon Musk est en train de construire avec X. Tous les médias de l'histoire ont été couplés à une culture, une langue, une bulle géographique. Le Monde parle aux Français. Le NYT parle aux Américains. NHK parle aux Japonais. Chaque média filtre le réel à travers le prisme de sa culture locale. X est en train de devenir le premier média de l'humanité. Pas d'un pays. De l'espèce. Je le vis en temps réel. Mes posts en français se font RT par des Japonais, répondre par des Brésiliens, citer par des Américains. Des conversations qui n'auraient jamais existé il y a 5 ans. Un libertarien français qui débat avec un ingénieur de Tokyo et un entrepreneur de Sao Paulo sous le même tweet. Pas traduit par un éditeur. Traduit instantanément par l'IA, en un clic. Les bulles de filtre culturelles sont en train d'exploser. Et je pense qu'on sous-estime massivement les effets composés de ça. Quand une idée peut traverser un océan en 3 secondes, quand un argument sourcé posté à Paris peut être vérifié par un économiste à Singapour et amplifié par un développeur à Austin dans la même heure, le coût de propagation d'une bonne idée tend vers zéro. Et c'est catastrophique pour un type d'acteur très précis : les médias qui ont construit leur business model sur le monopole de l'information locale. Ceux qui pouvaient raconter n'importe quoi sur "ce qui se passe ailleurs" parce que personne ne pouvait vérifier. Quand un journaliste français écrit que "le modèle américain ne marche pas", maintenant il y a 50 Américains dans les réponses avec des sources. Quand un éditorialiste dit que "le Danemark prouve que le socialisme fonctionne", il y a un Danois qui explique que le Danemark est 10e en liberté économique mondiale. Le fact-checking n'est plus un département. C'est un effet réseau. Les médias honnêtes n'ont rien à craindre de ça. Les médias qui vendaient une narration protégée par l'ignorance géographique de leur audience vont avoir un problème existentiel. Parce qu'on ne peut plus mentir à l'échelle locale quand le monde entier regarde.
Français
2.2K
11.1K
49.8K
47.9M
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Illinois Men's Basketball
Illinois Men's Basketball@IlliniMBB·
For everyone in the Orange and Blue.
English
16
555
4.4K
91.1K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Bleacher Report
Bleacher Report@BleacherReport·
ILLINOIS HAS PUNCHED ITS TICKET TO THE FINAL FOUR 🚨 FIRST TIME SINCE 2005 Watch March Madness on TNT Sports
English
52
560
7.2K
319.7K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Illinois Men's Basketball
Illinois Men's Basketball@IlliniMBB·
ARE YOU WITH US? For the first time since 2005, we're heading to the FINAL FOUR.
Illinois Men's Basketball tweet media
English
260
3.6K
13.3K
662.4K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
TNT Sports U.S.
TNT Sports U.S.@TNTSportsUS·
"I don't want anybody to think this is it...we're coming to win two more games." Andrej Stojakovic says the Illini are coming for more than just the Final Four. 🔥
English
53
434
7.4K
363.7K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Glenn Kinley
Glenn Kinley@glenn_kinley·
#Illini Zvonimir Ivisic celebrates the Elite 8 win with a Croatian flag. The Balkan Illini are going to the Final Four. (Photo from AP)
Glenn Kinley tweet media
English
0
25
513
6K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Jennifer Sey
Jennifer Sey@JenniferSey·
To all those who follow me because of @xx_xyathletics and who are now telling me to stop talking about covid... Let me just explain a few things -- and why that isn't going to happen. The only reason I'm even active on @X is because of covid. The only reason I have any following at all is because of covid. Why? Because I objected to school closures and lockdowns from day 1. I lost my career, my city, pretty much all of my friends. Because I said closed schools, closed playgrounds, and masking were harming our kids. We all suffered the most egregious violations of our civil liberties imaginable during lockdowns. I will never understand why people don't care and want to just pretend it never happened. We couldn't leave our homes. Literally. We were told we couldn't see family, celebrate the holidays. We couldn't move about freely. We were censored. We couldn't gather or protest (unless it was for BLM, then it was ok). People couldn't go to church or AA meetings. For years! Two year olds were forced to wear masks for hours a day. They suffered speech and developmental delays. That continue to this day. Public school students in blue states were kept out of full time school for a year and a half. While their private school peers attended school and played sports. The most vulnerable children were harmed the most. People couldn't work. 27M people lost their jobs in 2020. 27M!! People couldn't visit loved ones in the hospital. People died alone. Women gave birth alone. People were arrested for surfing. In the ocean - alone. The world shut down. Supply chains stopped. That initiated the inflation we still are struggling to beat back. I've been a covid dissident since March 2020. Children were harmed. They are still suffering from learning loss and the emotional impact of isolation and halted development. For some, the course of their lives was altered forever. They dropped out of school. Or fell behind and never caught up. Disengaged and never re-engaged. Drugs. Eating disorders. Suicidal ideation. Attempted suicide. Oh and the by way, the trans madness accelerated during lockdowns. Why? Isolation, terminal on-line-ness, depression, anxiety, all of it. Caused by lockdowns. This is not something I will forgive. Or forget. You can't treat kids like prisoners and expect them to be ok (that is quote from a parent in Generation Covid - a parent who lost his child to suicide in 2021.) I started making this documentary in 2022, and followed children and families who were harmed for 2 full years. It's called Generation-Covid. Don't look away.
English
1.2K
4.8K
19.8K
429.4K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Steve Stewart-Williams
Steve Stewart-Williams@SteveStuWill·
"78% of students told us they self-censor on their beliefs surrounding gender identity; 72% on politics; 68% on family values. More than 80% said they had submitted classwork that misrepresented their views in order to align with professors." stevestewartwilliams.com/p/faking-woken…
English
175
902
3.5K
114.8K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Joe Rogan Podcast News
Joe Rogan Podcast News@joeroganhq·
Ex-cult member says the quiet part out loud: Wokeness is a cult. "You have to be willing to say things that you know aren’t true."
English
85
636
3.7K
206K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations
“What the Fourth Industrial Revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, our digital, and our biological identities.” - Klaus Schwab, Founder of World Economic Forum From the very first day I launched Sovereign Nations in 2017, I’ve been trying to get people to stop arguing only about the *what* and start asking the *why*. Why the relentless push for Critical Race Theory AKA Identity Marxism? Why the sudden mainstreaming of every flavor of Neo-Marxist ideology in our schools, our corporations, our media and even in our churches? It’s not random. It’s not organic. It’s strategic. Division has always been the point. You fracture a nation along lines of race, class, gender, history—turn neighbor against neighbor—and while everyone is locked in an endless cultural knife fight, something much bigger moves forward without serious resistance. That “something” is the Fourth Industrial Revolution: a sweeping technological and economic restructuring that fuses man with A.I. , introduces digital communism, and creates centralization, surveillance, along with unprecedented control. You can’t fundamentally remake society if people are united and clear-headed. But what if they’re exhausted, angry, and tribal? If they’re fighting over symbols while algorithms, automation, and centralized digital systems are quietly locking into place? Then transformation becomes much easier to “manage.” I’ve been saying from the beginning: CRT and its ideological cousins on the Woke Right are not the end goal. They are the strategic tools for societal deconstruction. The battleground is cultural—but the objective is structural. And if we don’t understand the why, we’ll keep fighting each other while the future is decided without us. Identity Marxism on the Left was never going to fully succeed if it stayed neatly contained on one side of the political fence. Dialectical conflict requires two poles. It requires tension. It requires a reaction. And when you understand this, you start to see something else happening in real time: the mirroring effect. If you weaponize identity politics on the Left,you then weaponize identity politics on the Right - dressed differently, branded differently, but operating on the same underlying framework. Suddenly everything is about identity again. Not individual liberty. Not constitutionalism. Not equal justice under law. Identity. Tribal blocs. Civilizational grievance. Blood-and-soil rhetoric repackaged for a new audience. Voices emerge who frame politics less around timeless principles and more around group power, religious supremacy, or cultural domination. And once both sides are playing the same game — once both sides are speaking the language of identity as destiny — you don’t have a healthy republic anymore. You have dialectical political warfare. You have two camps locked in escalating conflict, each convinced the other is existential, each justifying more extreme measures. Meanwhile, the fabric of the nation frays. This is what is called the “Big Sort.” It’s not just demographic; it’s psychological and ideological. Americans are being pushed, prodded, and algorithmically herded into hardened camps. Every day there’s another outrage, another demoralizing headline, another cultural flashpoint. It weakens civic trust. It erodes shared identity. It exhausts the public. And when a nation is divided, demoralized, and suspicious of itself, it becomes far easier to reshape economically, politically, technologically. And here’s the part nobody wants to say out loud. The louder each side virtue signals to its own tribe, the more extreme the language becomes. It’s a feedback loop. Applause rewards escalation. Algorithms reward outrage. Moderation gets you ignored; fury gets you followers. So the rhetoric hardens. The lines sharpen. The caricatures get darker. And once words stop being about persuasion and start being about dehumanization, you are on a very dangerous road. History teaches this over and over again: when rhetoric radicalizes long enough, kinetic conflict stops sounding unthinkable. It starts sounding inevitable. People begin to see their fellow citizens not as neighbors with different ideas, but as existential threats. That is the psychological precondition for real violence. And whether by design or by cynical exploitation, there have been forces for decades studying exactly how to fracture societies along these fault lines. The tragedy is that many well-meaning Americans - on both sides - don’t realize they’re participating in a script. They think they’re defending their team. They don’t see how constant division, constant rage, constant tribal sorting weakens the republic itself. A divided America is easier to destabilize, easier to manage, easier to transform. And while we’re busy tearing at each other, there are powerful voices openly dreaming about a future defined by total technological transformation - about merging man and machine, about governance by algorithms, about an era where decision-making is increasingly handed over to artificial intelligence systems. If a nation is fractured and exhausted, it becomes far more willing to trade liberty for order, humanity for efficiency. That’s the real danger. Not disagreement. Not debate. But the slow erosion of our shared moral foundation - until we’re so divided that we accept a future we never consciously chose.
English
17
93
199
13.6K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 BREAKING: In a stunning blow to Democrats, 76% PERCENT of BLACK Americans want nationwide voter ID — in other words, the SAVE America Act White voters: 85% want it Latino voters: 82% want it Another leftist narrative just got decimated. Pass voter ID. GET THIS PASSED. 🇺🇸
English
2.5K
24K
87.8K
2.6M
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
Let's talk about the opening part of this statement: "nobody is illegal on stolen land." We can break it down, but we should also know what it is. What we are looking at is Chinese-style political sloganeering called "tifa" (提法). Communist communications ever since Mao took over China (and the CCP before that) almost always follow this kind of formulation, called 提法 (tífǎ), which literally translates as "watchwords" or "slogans." Literally, it means to lift up or present or highlight the core message or political principle in play through a charged slogan. The purpose of the sloganeering is actually to do a kind of political engineering through carefully selected and weaponized words that are easily memorable and that hijack the critical thinking faculties of the people who both hear and repeat them so they'll advance the Party line. You can think of tifa quite literally as a form of "discourse engineering" with the intent of doing political engineering or political warfare more or less by hijacking people's brains through mystifying slogans. (Mystification is like a more powerful form of confusion, akin to having been put under a spell.) In his amazing analysis of the CCP in the early 1950s, just after Mao took power (in October 1949), psychologist Robert Jay Lifton referred to what amounts to tifa as "thought-terminating clichés." That is, they're slogans (or clichés) that have the power to turn off your ability to think clearly about what's being said and implied and to just go along with the political messaging rather than to question it. The mechanisms of these political warfare tools are mystification and rhetorical entrapment. Mystification is overriding critical thinking with carefully constructed falsehoods and framing. Rhetorical entrapment occurs when there's no easy way to disagree with the framing (think, "black lives matter" or "Christ is king" (as the Groypers use it), both of which are examples of tifa). The mystification part is a process of using carefully constructed falsehoods presented as truisms that undermine the critical thinking process. That is, the statements can be seen as "obviously" true in a particular way that disguises how they are false in another way. For example, black lives obviously matter, but supporting the organization is something people should not do. The statement "nobody is illegal on stolen land" is very sophisticated as tifa because it contains three mystifications in just six words: 1) "Nobody is illegal" confuses the distinction between being a human being of basic human dignity and being a citizen of a country or legal visitor there; 2) "Stolen land" confuses the legitimacy of the country in question; 3) The idea of being able to be legal or illegal if the country itself is not legal because it is "stolen land." This is distinct from the idea of the land itself being stolen because it conceptually bridges the concept of legality and legitimacy of the country. As you can tell, breaking down and explaining the failures of all three parts of this mystification (demystification) is both challenging and exhausting, and it takes so much space that most people will not engage with it due to its length (which will be three orders of magnitude greater (5000-6000 words) than the tifa itself (6 words) to explicate fully and two orders of magnitude greater (600-800 words) just to barely articulate). Raise these by another order of magnitude of effort or two for the argument that will follow the attempt to demystify. The point is that to fully engage a six-word tifa through explanation, discussion, and argument to try to break someone free of it might take 50-100 thousand words worth of effort by the time all is said and done. (Another example: "trans women are women"; look how much effort that one has taken!) This example of tifa also contains two rhetorical traps that derive from the first two mystifications: A) It dares critics to say that people themselves are illegal (illegitimate) because of a political circumstance, thus replacing a legalistic fact with a moral assertion, one that is difficult to litigate without considerable expertise and that might still lose on emotional appeal ("empathy"); B) It lures critics into litigating the legality of the establishment of the nation in question, which undermines the justified presumption of authority in the national concept. These rhetorical traps not only put critics in a bad, weak, and likely losing position from the start, but they also invite adopting a reactionary or chauvinistic stance as the only possible reply (e.g., "we aren't colonizers; we're conquerors" or "illegals are illegitimate"). This feeds the strategic principle of "your target's reaction is your real action" upon which these manipulative movements gain the most ground. In short, tifa like this hijacks the capacity to understand the situation correctly in a succinct, repeatable phrase even Billie Eilish can repeat in about a second and a half (confuses and mystifies) while arranging a sophisticated psychological and public opinion trap that is mostly lose-lose-lose for those who would object. Notice that through the application of tifa as a form of political warfare (public opinion warfare, specifically), any idiot (including the average Billie Eilish fan) can ensnare any good-faith actor in this very sophisticated political warfare device even without understanding in the slightest how it works, dragging them into either confusion or arguments meant to be fought on losing ground for the good-faith critic. You don't need a sophisticated political warfare operator to make this happen. Furthermore, notice that any idiot who falls for the tifa here will actually repeat it, making the slogan campaign viral so that it is mostly being fought out not by experts but by masses of laypeople who know there's a fight but who aren't properly equipped to deal with it. This is why it is an example of "public opinion warfare" as one of the CCP's "three warfares" doctrine styles. As summarized by the RAND Corporation: "Tifa have four identifying characteristics: (1) They are politically laden and stated verbatim, (2) they extend along a clear line of authority, (3) they are distributed to official party organs, and (4) they characterize or resolve a dialectical contradiction between competing ideas in the CCP." Engaging with this kind of slogan, as we must, brings critics into a "dialectical space" that's roughly on the level of the average idiot who can argue emotively or even just repeat the slogan as a kind of verbal cudgel (for those watching) rather than genuinely engaging. We might call this the "Reeeeee! Effect," and we all know it works very well. Tifa creates the "Reeeeee! Effect." Since the late 1960s, almost all "New Leftist" activism in the West runs on a Maoist-Marxist engine, including the heavy use of tifa sloganeering as a form of rhetorical and political warfare. Most of what we engage in today with their B.S. rhetoric is tifa. So these "thought-terminating clichés" (tifa) are very powerful and sophisticated political warfare tools that we all encounter every day. The only way to beat them is to identify them for the manipulations they are and explain them as best we can so that people are more likely to identify them and less likely to fall for them, and also to help people out of the ones they're already caught in and under the spell of.
Breaking911@Breaking911

Billie Eilish at the Grammys: "Nobody is illegal on stolen land. We need to keep fighting and speaking up. Our voices do matter...f*ck ICE."

English
471
1.5K
5.5K
589K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 BREAKING: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele is being praised for absolutely NAILING IT on toxic LGBTQ ideology "We are against their anti-natural, anti-God, anti-family ideologies. That DOES NOT FIT in our schools!" 🔥 "It is also important not only that the curriculum does not carry this gender ideology and all these things, but it is also important that parents are informed and have a voice and vote in what their children are going to learn." "We want biology, mathematics, important things for their learning. And then they come and want to put ideologies, they want to put things contrary to nature!" BUKELE IS GREAT! 🇺🇸🇸🇻
English
80
1.1K
6.3K
305.2K
Julie Obradovic retweetledi
Chief Nerd
Chief Nerd@TheChiefNerd·
🔥 MUST WATCH: David Sacks Dismantles the Media’s Narrative on ICE “The deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti are regrettable and tragic. So are the deaths of Laken Riley … and too many others to mention who were murdered by criminal illegal aliens. And the media won't ever tell you their names.”
English
177
2K
7.3K
293.6K