Sabitlenmiş Tweet
P2P.org
7.2K posts
P2P.org
@P2Pvalidator
Institutional staking, done right. 50+ networks. $10B+ secured. 0 slashing.
Katılım Eylül 2018
496 Takip Edilen23.7K Takipçiler
In case you missed it: @bronwallet users can stake ETH, SOL, TON, and HYPE directly from their wallet in one tap, powered by @P2Pvalidator. Non-custodial from end to end, assets stay where they belong. Worth a look if self-custody and yield are both on your list.
Bron Wallet@bronwallet
One tap staking for ETH, SOL, TON, and HYPE inside Bron. Powered by @P2Pvalidator. The sweet part? HYPE staking works natively through Bron, thanks to HyperEVM and HyperCore integration. Earn while assets stay under your control. Never leave your wallet to stake.
English
Important update for $ESP delegators!
Starting May 29, 2026, we will no longer support @EspressoSys as a validator.
Please undelegate or redelegate your assets before this deadline.
If you have any questions, contact our team via the official Telegram group: t.me/P2Pstaking
English
@bronwallet Staking from inside your wallet, no redirects, no third-party custody handoff. That is the right architecture. Proud to power staking for @bronwallet users across ETH, SOL, TON, and HYPE. Assets stay where they belong.
English
One tap staking for ETH, SOL, TON, and HYPE inside Bron.
Powered by @P2Pvalidator. The sweet part? HYPE staking works natively through Bron, thanks to HyperEVM and HyperCore integration.
Earn while assets stay under your control. Never leave your wallet to stake.
English
MiCA is live.
What compliance teams are actually approving and what they're not is a different conversation.
We're having it on May 20. Register now: luma.com/Institutional_…
English
Heads up to @SuiNetwork delegators.
From 20 May 2026, the P2P.org SUI validator commission moves from 8% to 10%.
Delegations remain non-custodial.
Protocol rewards continue to accrue per network rules.
No action required.
English
Proud to run a relayer in the @symbiosis_fi network.
Distributed validation, separate infrastructure, no shared keys.
Cross-chain settlement should never depend on a single node, and this is a model built that way.
Symbiosis@symbiosis_fi
After recent incidents across cross-chain infrastructure, a lot of teams started asking harder questions about how cross-chain infrastructure actually works. We think that's the right question to ask, so here's our answer about how Symbiosis works under the hood. 1. The core part of the protocol is the relayer network. Not a single DVN, a set of 15+ independent validators running Symbiosis verification stack on separate infrastructure with no shared keys: @P2Pvalidator, @luganodes, @PierTwo_com, @BlockscapeLab and others. Most of validators are part of the integration with @symbioticfi infrastructure of shared security layer. Every cross-chain message has to pass through this network before anything settles on the destination chain. One node going down or getting compromised doesn't move assets and the network keeps running, the message doesn't clear until the 2/3 of nodes agree. That's what kept Symbiosis operational while others were pausing. You can check all relayers here: staking.symbiosis.finance 2. On top of that: liquidity lives in Octopools — canonical pools for stablecoins, ETH, and BTC deployed natively on each chain, no wrapped assets sitting in custodial multisigs. LPs earn real stablecoin yield from swap fees, nothing inflated by token emissions: app.symbiosis.finance/liquidity-v2/p… 3. Every on-chain leg of a swap routes through DEXs and aggregators to provide users any-to-any token swaps — best price found automatically before bridging. 4. For developers: API at symbiosis.finance/devportal MCP server for AI agents at symbiosis.finance/mcp-server Symbiosis is: - More than 4 years of stable operations. - $8B+ routed. - 800k+ addresses. Trust over years. Security earned, not claimed.
English
We built the full framework for custodians, funds, ETF issuers, and treasury teams.
Covers liquidity architecture, risk layering, reporting requirements, governance policy, and a due diligence checklist.
Full article ⬇️
p2p.org/economy/how-to…
English
Multi-network programs also create governance obligations that single-network programs often ignore.
Every PoS network in your program has governance processes. When you delegate, you delegate governance representation.
For custodians and ETF issuers with fiduciary obligations, that is not a passive decision.
English
The March 2026 SEC and CFTC ruling changed more than the legal landscape.
It exposed a program design gap that most institutions have not addressed.
Ethereum-only staking programs were built for a single-network world. That world is gone.
This is a thread about how to build an institutional staking program across multiple networks. 👇
English
🚨 @P2Pvalidator has decided to shut down its validator on @Coredao_Org as part of the ongoing optimization of our validator portfolio and infrastructure resources.
The shutdown will take place on May 22. After this date, our node will no longer participate in validation or block production.
We appreciate the @Coredao_Org community's collaboration and trust.
Delegators are encouraged to withdraw or redelegate their stake to another validator before May 22 to ensure continued rewards.
English
Asset managers, custodians, hedge funds, ETF issuers, exchanges, and staking teams: do not miss the Key Takeaways section in the full post.
🔗 p2p.org/economy/confli… . .
English
For vault operators: the conflict of interest question is not a future compliance gap. MiFID II, AIFMD II, and MiCA already apply to the institutional clients interacting with your vault.
For institutional allocators: the due diligence question has shifted. Not "does this operator have a conflict of interest policy?" but "can they demonstrate the conflict is structurally managed at the execution level?"
English
