Sabitlenmiş Tweet
S0Ldev
728 posts

S0Ldev
@S0Ldev
Shipping web3 tools & ideas | Dev since 08 | AI nerd | Building @pmpr_bot
Toronto, Ontario Katılım Eylül 2025
121 Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler

After funding over 5,000 coin launches through Pmpr, we’re making a small change.
First-time launches will continue to be funded.
After that, users will fund their own launches.
It currently costs as low as 0.0072 SOL (up to 0.0085 SOL on congested hours) to launch a coin on Pmpr.
This helps keep things sustainable and invite serious devs as usage grows, while still lowering the barrier for new users to try it.
Launching fees may evolve over time as the platform scales.
English

The problem is that the solution isn’t as simple as stopping devs from deploying the same coin names or tickers because there could truly be an issue with the launched tokens, such as wrong pictures, wrong links, not sharing creator rewards with the right wallet/github..and a plethora of other issues.
One thing that genuinely could fix this is like you mentioned, charging a higher amount for token launches to avoid random/spam launches just trying to get in on the action with no real substance and/or launch a coin with misleading info..etc
English

How can @Pumpfun address this? On our end, as a tool connected to their platform, we could simply not allow duplicate tickers.
I understand they probably do not want to do this as it would limit the number of tokens launched on their platform. But what if having a unique ticker came at a higher cost to launch? Similar to buying a domain. If that exclusivity only exists within the PumpFun ecosystem, that alone would be enough. Everyone from other layers would come because they would immediately see the difference.
English

The memecoin market is maturing and getting sharper.
Retail now understands that this is an attention market and that capital flows to viral narratives that they believe will eventually catch.
The real problem is dilution AKA vamps.
Traders want to bid on strong narratives, but it becomes almost impossible when there are 10 or more copies of the same token at the same time, attention is immediately split and nothing ends up sticking.
This is driving retail away in the process, and slowly damaging the ecosystem because of the reputation memecoins are starting to build.
People naturally enter and exit markets over time. We’ve seen this happen in every hype cycle across many industries, not just crypto, Solana, or memecoins.
What’s different now is the speed.
Vamps and constant pvp are accelerating the cycle to an unnatural pace. A retail trader comes in, understands that this is an attention market, finds a narrative, enters, gets chewed immediately, and leaves.
That entire cycle is happening a lot faster than it should.
Instead of time for narratives to develop, communities to form, and momentum to build, people are split up and attention is instantly fragmented.
When that happens repeatedly, people stop coming back.
And when people stop coming back, the entire system starts to weaken.
The solution isn’t to simply stop people from launching the same name coins. PVPs and vamps don’t happen for no reason, some devs miss adding an important piece of information, use the wrong name, aren’t sharing creator rewards with the right wallet, creator’s GitHub isn’t linked, and so many more conditions that are valid reasons to launch another token.
In your opinion how do we put an end to this?
English

Gm ☀️
I’m still building, still shipping, and continuing to improve Pmpr.
A lot of progress has been made in the last week, and there’s more features actively being built
PMPR remains an open experiment focused on real tooling and real usage
Just focused on continuing to build and making Pmpr the best CT tool there is 🫡
English

Does this really solve the issue 🤔
alon@a1lon9
Vamping & griefing are some of the biggest pain points of recent times Although it's impossible to solve 100% of this behavior at the blockchain layer, we can still try to mitigate where we can Today’s update is a small step in that direction. Here’s how it works 👇
English

Pmpr has evolved piece by piece. I’m tightening what’s there, adding what’s missing, and learning from how people actually used it
The work is visible some days, most days it’s not.
Either way, Pmpr is a truly wild experiment so far, progress is being made. Just focused on making something that holds up 🫡
English

@kaspa_vs @BedouinAlpha I had this happen with a test account when I was building it. This is an X reach reach issue with your account not with Pmpr
English

gm ☀️
Market’s taking a breath and Pmpr’s starting to feel different
More activity, more launches, more people genuinely interacting with the tech and more people are genuinely wanting to launch their tokens with Pmpr
A lot has been built in a short amount of time, and we’re just getting started with what’s possible
It’s a good to build. Let’s see what gets built today 🤝🏻
English

Yo @pmpr_bot launch token
Name: Thomas Jefferson’s sixth great grandson
Ticker: $THOMAS
Use this image

Redd@ReddCinema
Thomas Jefferson’s sixth great grandson recreates his photo
English

@Jhon_Badman @pmpr_bot I’ll look into this one as soon as possible. Looks like some cases are still slipping through
English


$PMPR @pmpr_bot @S0Ldev @mrpunkdoteth
AX9D7Nqtu3enaeL4ELxoagsNV7AyEQEhK2ziwiyJpump
t.me/Mrpunkchatbox/…

ʙᴀ 🦅🏜️@BedouinAlpha
Partnership with @mrpunkdoteth ⏳ $PMPR
Eesti

Scaling Pmpr brings a different kind of pressure
More users means more edge cases, more stress on the system, and more responsibility on our side to make sure that we’re as close as possible to a 100% uptime
We’re positioning Pmpr to be the go-to for launching, and this means continuing to build out better tooling, features, and give better incentives for builders
Taking it step by step and making sure everything holds up while we scale
English






